# 00:51:14 |
sh4rm4 |
quits : *.net *.split |
# 00:51:16 |
kos_tom |
quits : *.net *.split |
# 00:51:17 |
mnt_real |
quits : *.net *.split |
# 00:55:18 |
sh4rm4 |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 00:55:18 |
mnt_real |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 00:55:18 |
kos_tom |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 04:52:42 |
mnt_real |
quits : Quit: Leaving |
# 07:08:43 |
y_morin |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 07:18:43 |
smartin |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 14:58:38 |
y_morin |
quits |
# 15:59:47 |
y_morin |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 16:46:08 |
y_morin |
is now known as: y_morin|away |
# 17:12:41 |
smartin |
quits : Ping timeout: 265 seconds |
# 17:33:22 |
y_morin|away |
is now known as: y_morin |
# 17:44:46 |
y_morin |
is now known as: y_morin|away |
# 18:31:42 |
y_morin|away |
is now known as: y_morin |
# 18:42:11 |
y_morin |
is now known as: y_morin|away |
# 18:56:50 |
mnt_real |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 18:57:45 |
mnt_real |
y_morin|away: looking at linaro's patch on making pkgversion optional |
# 18:58:21 |
mnt_real |
y_morin|away: isn't the inclusion of pkgversion part of the license ? |
# 19:22:39 |
smartin |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 20:37:53 |
y_morin|away |
is now known as: y_morin |
# 20:39:09 |
y_morin |
mnt_real: hello! Not sure what you mean by "inclusion of pkgversion part of the license". |
# 20:39:43 |
y_morin |
There is nothing in the license that sttes the "crostool-NG" should be part of the pkgversion. That's a restriction, and thus is not allowed by the GPL. |
# 20:39:57 |
y_morin |
s/sttes/states/ |
# 20:41:33 |
y_morin |
mnt_real: That's just that I would prefer that stock crosstool-NG does set pkgversion to "crosstool-NG foobar", but nothing prevents someone from removing that part of the code and simply setting it to "foobar" |
# 20:41:51 |
mnt_real |
y_morin: thanks for the explanation, I misunderstood then, for some reason we had to have that string as part of the generated toolchains |
# 20:42:31 |
mnt_real |
y_morin: I meant, for some reason I thought we had to have that sting part of the generated toolchains |
# 20:43:02 |
mnt_real |
y_morin: god I can't type /sting/string/ |
# 20:43:34 |
mnt_real |
y_morin: toolchains I was shipping I always left that string to show that it was generated by crostoolng |
# 20:43:38 |
y_morin |
mnt_real: no, no, not at all. But what the GPL states is that you have to supply the "scripts used to control compilation and installation" (in GPLv2) |
# 20:44:12 |
mnt_real |
y_morin: OK so we need to supply crosstoolng which is the script ... |
# 20:44:22 |
y_morin |
So having that string in toolchains help identification. |
# 20:44:50 |
y_morin |
mnt_real: yes, that's explained in the LICENSES" file in the top-level dir of crosstool-NG, last section. |
# 20:44:57 |
mnt_real |
y_morin: besides I thought it is nice to have the string there to give the right credit to crosstoolsng |
# 20:45:12 |
y_morin |
Yes, that also! :-) |
# 20:45:37 |
mnt_real |
y_morin: so I will continue including the string and refer to the repository as the sources |
# 20:48:03 |
y_morin |
mnt_real: we're sliding to a sensible subject here. IANAL, but pointing to the upstream is usually considered enough. But the _letter_ of the GPL states, roughly, "on the same place as the executable", which means: the CD or CD set, the same FTP, and so on... GPLv3 is more laxist on this subject, though, but I don't know it enough to comment. |
# 20:48:35 |
y_morin |
And that's all I'll state on this subject for now... |
# 20:52:35 |
mnt_real |
y_morin: thank y_morin, no worries, I will read up more as well and make sure I'll continue providing whatever necessary if not more, thanks for your attention so far |
# 20:52:52 |
y_morin |
mnt_real: my pleasure! :-) |
# 20:54:53 |
mnt_real |
y_morin: thanks for maintaining such a nice tool, you are doing a very good job, it helps me quite a bit. |
# 20:59:39 |
y_morin |
mnt_real: Cheers! Thanks, it helps reading such comments! :-) |
# 21:03:53 |
bhundven |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 21:11:02 |
smartin |
quits |
# 21:16:27 |
mnt_real |
y_morin: just saw your post on the subject, I feel bad I created the confusion, hopefully it will be helpful for some others at some point as well, you stated it all very clearly, thanks again |
# 21:17:43 |
y_morin |
mnt_real: don't worry. I prefer that questions be asked, and get answered, rather than FUD being disseminated! :-) |
# 21:17:59 |
mnt_real |
y_morin: :) |
# 21:18:38 |
y_morin |
mnt_real: thank you for raising the issue. Hopefully, it's all set now!:-) |
# 21:19:12 |
y_morin |
is just considering doing the 1.13.0 release right now.... |
# 21:19:42 |
y_morin |
Everything look nice, and it's anyway too late to add anything new. |
# 21:21:13 |
y_morin |
OTOH, releases usually appear on the last day of the month, so I may just prepare the release now, and push it when I'm back from ELC-E/LinuxCon, just in case there's a last-minute issue popping up... |
# 21:31:21 |
mnt_real |
y_morin: I can test 1.13.0 for my set of toolchains (arm, powerpc) when the release becomes available |
# 21:32:28 |
y_morin |
mnt_real: you can test right now by using the repository. I'll push a last changeset that updates all the samples, in the coming minutes... |
# 21:33:51 |
mnt_real |
y_morin: OK, I will just do that, have your last changeset and will test it out ... |
# 21:36:28 |
y_morin |
mnt_real: OK, it's in. Thank you! :-) |
# 21:38:03 |
mnt_real |
y_morin: great, thanks, I'll let you know if I see something strange, will test probably little after supper time, are you in European time ? |
# 21:38:17 |
y_morin |
mnt_real: UTC+0200, yes. |
# 21:40:42 |
mnt_real |
y_morin: OK we are at -5, we'll send you and e-mail then if there is anything and if you are gone, goodnight then ... |
# 21:41:40 |
y_morin |
mnt_real: OK, thanks! I'll probably be gone at 00:00 here, in about 30min... |
# 21:42:10 |
mnt_real |
y_morin: sounds good, have a good night and a nice start tomorrow :) |
# 21:42:31 |
y_morin |
Cheers! Have a good evening! See ya! |
# 21:42:37 |
mnt_real |
y_morin: :) |
# 22:04:47 |
y_morin |
quits : Quit: Quitting... |