# 00:03:48 |
bhundven |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 01:18:54 |
tzanth |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 01:19:49 |
tzarc |
quits : Ping timeout: 260 seconds |
# 03:33:12 |
bhundven |
quits : Ping timeout: 252 seconds |
# 03:42:42 |
bhundven |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 03:42:42 |
bhundven |
quits : Changing host |
# 03:42:42 |
bhundven |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 03:54:20 |
mnt_real_ |
quits : Quit: Ex-Chat |
# 04:48:18 |
alan_o |
quits : Remote host closed the connection |
# 05:21:25 |
esbenh |
quits : *.net *.split |
# 05:21:25 |
sh4rm4 |
quits : *.net *.split |
# 05:21:27 |
tzanth |
quits : *.net *.split |
# 05:21:28 |
ccole |
quits : *.net *.split |
# 05:21:30 |
ChanServ |
quits : *.net *.split |
# 05:22:05 |
tzanth |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 05:22:05 |
sh4rm4 |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 05:22:05 |
ccole |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 05:22:05 |
esbenh |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 05:22:05 |
ChanServ |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 06:18:03 |
bhundven |
quits : Quit: Leaving. |
# 09:09:51 |
esbenh |
quits : *.net *.split |
# 09:26:28 |
smartin |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 09:32:56 |
smartin |
quits : Ping timeout: 245 seconds |
# 09:58:20 |
esbenh |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 10:01:01 |
y_morin |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 10:19:21 |
tzanth |
quits : Read error: Connection reset by peer |
# 10:21:46 |
tzarc |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 11:27:50 |
beneth` |
quits : Ping timeout: 272 seconds |
# 11:28:20 |
beneth` |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 11:49:31 |
kos_tom |
quits : Quit: leaving |
# 11:56:57 |
kos_tom |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 12:02:08 |
kos_tom |
quits : Ping timeout: 240 seconds |
# 12:08:53 |
kos_tom |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 12:12:22 |
kos_tom_ |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 13:15:28 |
kos_tom_ |
quits : Quit: leaving |
# 16:12:54 |
kos_tom |
y_morin: hello. |
# 16:13:02 |
kos_tom |
y_morin: is it normal that on failures, the build doesn't stop? |
# 16:13:41 |
kos_tom |
y_morin: see for example http://code.bulix.org/4vorlq-81470?raw |
# 16:25:57 |
y_morin |
kos_tom: nope, it's not. |
# 16:26:09 |
y_morin |
I'm investigating that, too... |
# 16:27:09 |
y_morin |
kos_tom: http://crosstool-ng.org/download/ibot-logs/2012-05-05.html#quick-21:42:52 |
# 16:28:32 |
y_morin |
But it seems it depends on the type of failure, and where it happens, because I already provoked four failures here, and they all got caught properly... :-( |
# 16:29:14 |
y_morin |
kos_tom: BTW, I also have a fix for the gcc-4.7's GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES |
# 16:29:30 |
y_morin |
Still investigating, but seems it is working, now... |
# 16:38:24 |
y_morin |
kos_tom: still running on your lenny system? |
# 16:38:47 |
y_morin |
Because there is a change in how bash-4 sets its internal variables |
# 16:39:08 |
y_morin |
And as I'm on squeeze, I don't see the issue. |
# 16:39:25 |
y_morin |
That's probably why a failure is not properly caught... |
# 16:49:40 |
kos_tom |
y_morin: yes, I'm still running on my lenny system. |
# 17:45:45 |
kos_tom |
y_morin: it doesn't make things easy to find which toolchain was built successfully, which toolchain wasn't |
# 18:07:23 |
joko |
quits : Read error: Connection reset by peer |
# 18:20:31 |
kos_tom |
and now: |
# 18:20:33 |
kos_tom |
[ERROR] /home/test/crosstool-ng-1.15.0/.build/src/gcc-4.6.3/libgcc/config/libbid/bid_decimal_globals.c:47:18: fatal error: fenv.h: No such file or directory |
# 18:52:13 |
y_morin |
kos_tom: Yep, I understand. Fact is, nothing changed in this respect between 1.14 and 1.15... |
# 18:53:51 |
y_morin |
kos_tom: were you still using pre-1.14.0 before switching to 1.15.0? |
# 18:59:01 |
kos_tom |
I think on this machine, I switched from 1.13.x to 1.15 directly |
# 19:00:41 |
y_morin |
kos_tom: OK, I see why you get the issue only now. |
# 19:01:32 |
y_morin |
kos_tom: but as you saif earlier, does it make sense maintaining backward compatibility with lenny, which is no longer maintained? |
# 19:01:36 |
y_morin |
*said |
# 19:11:07 |
kos_tom |
y_morin: probably not. |
# 19:11:24 |
kos_tom |
do you have an idea for the fenv.h problem? |
# 19:12:15 |
y_morin |
kos_tom: not on the top of my hat, but it rings a bell... |
# 19:13:15 |
y_morin |
kos_tom: I am trying to get 1.15 in shape for inclusion in BR, so I think your breakage issue not being caught is important to fix, in fact. |
# 19:13:42 |
y_morin |
kos_tom: probably, a lot of people, especially in companies, are still using 'legacy' distros... |
# 19:14:03 |
y_morin |
So if the fix is simple enough, I'll add it. |
# 19:16:10 |
y_morin |
kos_tom: the problem is identified and fixed, now. It is a limitation in POSIX, and that bash decided to interpret, and gets right (for once!). |
# 19:17:00 |
y_morin |
BTW, any idea if "IEEE Std 1003.1" has a more recent issue than 2008 ? |
# 19:18:37 |
y_morin |
Well, issue 7 was in 2008, issue 6 was in 2004. Maybe we'll get issue 8 this year! :-] |
# 19:21:52 |
y_morin |
kos_tom: could you try this patch: http://code.bulix.org/zdqf5f-81472 |
# 19:25:16 |
y_morin |
Well POSIX does not say whether "set -e" should catch a sub-shell that exits with !0. bash-3 did not catch it, while bash-4 does. |
# 19:25:58 |
y_morin |
Well, the patch catches errors in my lenny-32 chroot. |
# 19:26:19 |
y_morin |
kos_tom: does it work for you? |
# 20:19:41 |
kos_tom |
sorry, I was having dinner; |
# 20:20:02 |
y_morin |
kos_tom: No problem! ;-) |
# 20:20:17 |
kos_tom |
I'll watch a movie now, I'll test this later (tomorrow probably) |
# 20:20:50 |
y_morin |
It's difficult to tell whether you're on-line or not, your status almost never goes to "away". ;-) |
# 20:21:01 |
y_morin |
OK, happy evening! |
# 21:15:41 |
y_morin |
GAhhh! I pushed a bad changeset... :-( |
# 21:15:47 |
y_morin |
And released it! |
# 21:15:50 |
y_morin |
AHHH!!!! |
# 21:15:57 |
sh4rm4 |
:/ |
# 21:16:19 |
sh4rm4 |
time for a bugfix release... |
# 21:20:28 |
y_morin |
Yep, a bug-fix over a bug-fix... |
# 23:01:41 |
y_morin |
quits : Quit: Night! |