ibotlog2html for #crosstool-ng

<< Previous 2012-05-08 Next >>

# 00:03:48 bhundven joins #crosstool-ng
# 01:18:54 tzanth joins #crosstool-ng
# 01:19:49 tzarc quits : Ping timeout: 260 seconds
# 03:33:12 bhundven quits : Ping timeout: 252 seconds
# 03:42:42 bhundven joins #crosstool-ng
# 03:42:42 bhundven quits : Changing host
# 03:42:42 bhundven joins #crosstool-ng
# 03:54:20 mnt_real_ quits : Quit: Ex-Chat
# 04:48:18 alan_o quits : Remote host closed the connection
# 05:21:25 esbenh quits : *.net *.split
# 05:21:25 sh4rm4 quits : *.net *.split
# 05:21:27 tzanth quits : *.net *.split
# 05:21:28 ccole quits : *.net *.split
# 05:21:30 ChanServ quits : *.net *.split
# 05:22:05 tzanth joins #crosstool-ng
# 05:22:05 sh4rm4 joins #crosstool-ng
# 05:22:05 ccole joins #crosstool-ng
# 05:22:05 esbenh joins #crosstool-ng
# 05:22:05 ChanServ joins #crosstool-ng
# 06:18:03 bhundven quits : Quit: Leaving.
# 09:09:51 esbenh quits : *.net *.split
# 09:26:28 smartin joins #crosstool-ng
# 09:32:56 smartin quits : Ping timeout: 245 seconds
# 09:58:20 esbenh joins #crosstool-ng
# 10:01:01 y_morin joins #crosstool-ng
# 10:19:21 tzanth quits : Read error: Connection reset by peer
# 10:21:46 tzarc joins #crosstool-ng
# 11:27:50 beneth` quits : Ping timeout: 272 seconds
# 11:28:20 beneth` joins #crosstool-ng
# 11:49:31 kos_tom quits : Quit: leaving
# 11:56:57 kos_tom joins #crosstool-ng
# 12:02:08 kos_tom quits : Ping timeout: 240 seconds
# 12:08:53 kos_tom joins #crosstool-ng
# 12:12:22 kos_tom_ joins #crosstool-ng
# 13:15:28 kos_tom_ quits : Quit: leaving
# 16:12:54 kos_tom y_morin: hello.
# 16:13:02 kos_tom y_morin: is it normal that on failures, the build doesn't stop?
# 16:13:41 kos_tom y_morin: see for example http://code.bulix.org/4vorlq-81470?raw
# 16:25:57 y_morin kos_tom: nope, it's not.
# 16:26:09 y_morin I'm investigating that, too...
# 16:27:09 y_morin kos_tom: http://crosstool-ng.org/download/ibot-logs/2012-05-05.html#quick-21:42:52
# 16:28:32 y_morin But it seems it depends on the type of failure, and where it happens, because I already provoked four failures here, and they all got caught properly... :-(
# 16:29:14 y_morin kos_tom: BTW, I also have a fix for the gcc-4.7's GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
# 16:29:30 y_morin Still investigating, but seems it is working, now...
# 16:38:24 y_morin kos_tom: still running on your lenny system?
# 16:38:47 y_morin Because there is a change in how bash-4 sets its internal variables
# 16:39:08 y_morin And as I'm on squeeze, I don't see the issue.
# 16:39:25 y_morin That's probably why a failure is not properly caught...
# 16:49:40 kos_tom y_morin: yes, I'm still running on my lenny system.
# 17:45:45 kos_tom y_morin: it doesn't make things easy to find which toolchain was built successfully, which toolchain wasn't
# 18:07:23 joko quits : Read error: Connection reset by peer
# 18:20:31 kos_tom and now:
# 18:20:33 kos_tom [ERROR] /home/test/crosstool-ng-1.15.0/.build/src/gcc-4.6.3/libgcc/config/libbid/bid_decimal_globals.c:47:18: fatal error: fenv.h: No such file or directory
# 18:52:13 y_morin kos_tom: Yep, I understand. Fact is, nothing changed in this respect between 1.14 and 1.15...
# 18:53:51 y_morin kos_tom: were you still using pre-1.14.0 before switching to 1.15.0?
# 18:59:01 kos_tom I think on this machine, I switched from 1.13.x to 1.15 directly
# 19:00:41 y_morin kos_tom: OK, I see why you get the issue only now.
# 19:01:32 y_morin kos_tom: but as you saif earlier, does it make sense maintaining backward compatibility with lenny, which is no longer maintained?
# 19:01:36 y_morin *said
# 19:11:07 kos_tom y_morin: probably not.
# 19:11:24 kos_tom do you have an idea for the fenv.h problem?
# 19:12:15 y_morin kos_tom: not on the top of my hat, but it rings a bell...
# 19:13:15 y_morin kos_tom: I am trying to get 1.15 in shape for inclusion in BR, so I think your breakage issue not being caught is important to fix, in fact.
# 19:13:42 y_morin kos_tom: probably, a lot of people, especially in companies, are still using 'legacy' distros...
# 19:14:03 y_morin So if the fix is simple enough, I'll add it.
# 19:16:10 y_morin kos_tom: the problem is identified and fixed, now. It is a limitation in POSIX, and that bash decided to interpret, and gets right (for once!).
# 19:17:00 y_morin BTW, any idea if "IEEE Std 1003.1" has a more recent issue than 2008 ?
# 19:18:37 y_morin Well, issue 7 was in 2008, issue 6 was in 2004. Maybe we'll get issue 8 this year! :-]
# 19:21:52 y_morin kos_tom: could you try this patch: http://code.bulix.org/zdqf5f-81472
# 19:25:16 y_morin Well POSIX does not say whether "set -e" should catch a sub-shell that exits with !0. bash-3 did not catch it, while bash-4 does.
# 19:25:58 y_morin Well, the patch catches errors in my lenny-32 chroot.
# 19:26:19 y_morin kos_tom: does it work for you?
# 20:19:41 kos_tom sorry, I was having dinner;
# 20:20:02 y_morin kos_tom: No problem! ;-)
# 20:20:17 kos_tom I'll watch a movie now, I'll test this later (tomorrow probably)
# 20:20:50 y_morin It's difficult to tell whether you're on-line or not, your status almost never goes to "away". ;-)
# 20:21:01 y_morin OK, happy evening!
# 21:15:41 y_morin GAhhh! I pushed a bad changeset... :-(
# 21:15:47 y_morin And released it!
# 21:15:50 y_morin AHHH!!!!
# 21:15:57 sh4rm4 :/
# 21:16:19 sh4rm4 time for a bugfix release...
# 21:20:28 y_morin Yep, a bug-fix over a bug-fix...
# 23:01:41 y_morin quits : Quit: Night!

Generated by ibotlog2html by Yann E. MORIN