| # 00:10:31 | alan_o__ | quits : Quit: Leaving |
| # 00:10:46 | alan_o | joins #crosstool-ng |
| # 02:04:01 | tech1212 | joins #crosstool-ng |
| # 03:42:47 | alan_o | quits : Quit: Leaving |
| # 05:40:27 | sspiff | quits : Remote host closed the connection |
| # 06:36:33 | sspiff | joins #crosstool-ng |
| # 06:36:33 | sspiff | quits : Changing host |
| # 06:36:33 | sspiff | joins #crosstool-ng |
| # 07:17:47 | smartin | joins #crosstool-ng |
| # 08:41:28 | kos_tom_ | is now known as: kos_tom |
| # 09:26:24 | EsbenH_ | joins #crosstool-ng |
| # 10:01:17 | rikki | quits : Quit: Ima huntin wabbit. |
| # 10:16:26 | Net147 | joins #crosstool-ng |
| # 10:55:02 | EsbenH_ | hmm... |
| # 10:55:31 | EsbenH_ | It might be my fault, but hey.... |
| # 10:55:39 | EsbenH_ | ct-ng build.cc_core_pass_1 |
| # 10:55:55 | EsbenH_ | which is of-course plain wrong |
| # 10:56:33 | EsbenH_ | but spawning make in an infinite loop, or recursively, is a rather blunt way of telling me :-D |
| # 11:47:27 | tech1212 | quits : Ping timeout: 276 seconds |
| # 12:24:54 | smartin | quits : Quit: leaving |
| # 12:47:42 | imMute | xD |
| # 12:47:58 | imMute | "you're an idiot, and to make you feel bad I'm going to fork bomb your system, HAHA!" |
| # 12:59:40 | smartin | joins #crosstool-ng |
| # 13:42:37 | alan_o | joins #crosstool-ng |
| # 14:06:19 | Net147 | quits : Quit: HydraIRC -> http://www.hydrairc.com <- Organize your IRC |
| # 15:12:27 | sspiff | quits : Remote host closed the connection |
| # 15:24:25 | codyps | joins #crosstool-ng |
| # 16:22:44 | y_morin | joins #crosstool-ng |
| # 16:29:34 | mnt_real | quits : Ping timeout: 240 seconds |
| # 16:34:35 | mnt_real | joins #crosstool-ng |
| # 18:57:38 | smartin | quits : Quit: leaving |
| # 19:26:22 | EsbenH_ | what about *-*-uclinux-uclibcelf or *-*-uclinux-uclibcfdpic or *-*-uclinux-uclibcpic |
| # 19:29:51 | y_morin | EsbenH_: Hello! I am personally not against a saner semantic for the tuples, but we have to live with the existing stuff. |
| # 19:30:08 | y_morin | EsbenH_: And that's dictated by the config.{guess,sub} scripts. |
| # 19:30:41 | EsbenH_ | what are the requirement for bfin there? |
| # 19:31:39 | y_morin | EsbenH_: IMHO, your patch could well be something like: case "${arch}" in bfin) tuple_part=linux;; mips) tuple_part=uclinux;; *) ERROR;; esac |
| # 19:31:49 | EsbenH_ | looking at gcc's config.gcc, it seems like bfin is special, in that uclinux is strictly static linking, and linux-uclibc is therefore used for uclinux with fdpic-elf |
| # 19:32:43 | y_morin | EsbenH_: config.sub says: http://code.bulix.org/ouhfgm-82211 |
| # 19:32:57 | EsbenH_ | my gut feeling say that setting it to linux for bfin, and uclinux for everything is rather safe |
| # 19:33:21 | EsbenH_ | anything else that crops up can get an additional special handling. |
| # 19:33:55 | y_morin | EsbenH_: probably. But I'd rather play it safely, and only handle the exact cases we know of, and error-out on any other. |
| # 19:34:43 | EsbenH_ | ok, "m68k) tuple_part=uclinux" then, I don't do mips currently |
| # 19:34:58 | EsbenH_ | m68k is rather interesting in this respect |
| # 19:35:24 | EsbenH_ | there actually is m68k cpu's where gcc specifically supports both linux and uclinux, and both with uclibc of-course. |
| # 19:35:40 | y_morin | EsbenH_: yep, my bad (doing multiple things in // is not really one of my best skills!) |
| # 19:35:59 | EsbenH_ | so using linux-uclibc for uclinux-uclibc is bad. |
| # 19:36:03 | y_morin | EsbenH_: Gah! :-/ |
| # 19:36:39 | y_morin | EsbenH_: I still think the "case $arch in..esac" is what we need/want. |
| # 19:37:17 | ddvlad | parts #crosstool-ng |
| # 19:37:57 | EsbenH_ | yes, sounds good, |
| # 19:39:09 | EsbenH_ | I might even consider adding something after uclinux-uclibc, which I believe most config.{guess,sub,gcc} cases will handle just fine |
| # 19:39:28 | y_morin | EsbenH_: in a separate patch, then. |
| # 19:39:36 | EsbenH_ | similar to the *-*-linux-gnueabi and powerpc-*-linux-gnualtivec |
| # 19:39:53 | EsbenH_ | well, I don't need to do that in ct-ng |
| # 19:41:15 | y_morin | EsbenH_: sorry, I'm not sure I understand your "not in ct-ng" part. |
| # 19:41:16 | EsbenH_ | something else, did you ever give it more thought on how much it would require to add back support for building canadian cross with a pre-built cross? |
| # 19:41:56 | EsbenH_ | I can add to the end of the tuple in OE-lite, without ct-ng caring. |
| # 19:42:54 | y_morin | EsbenH_: (canadian) no, not really so far. I'm currently running multiple hares at the same time, which has every one knows, will guarantee I won't catch any! ;-) |
| # 19:43:02 | EsbenH_ | this is what plan to do to get powerpc-*-linux-gnualtivec |
| # 19:43:07 | y_morin | *as everyone knows... |
| # 19:43:47 | y_morin | EsbenH_: I am all for adding that stuff to ct-ng (currently playing with arm's gnueabihf here). |
| # 19:43:49 | EsbenH_ | I might have to do that myself then. I need (want) to go with a newer ct-ng for this coldfire stuff |
| # 19:44:21 | y_morin | EsbenH_: that would be nice! :-) |
| # 19:44:28 | EsbenH_ | he, we also have been looking at gnueabihf here. |
| # 19:45:10 | EsbenH_ | I wonder if anyone would be interesting to work with coldfire in buildroot again. It has been disabled for quite some time... |
| # 19:45:18 | y_morin | EsbenH_: (canadian) What I think would be awsome if we could get it, is rather than build either cross or canadian, we could build both at the same time. |
| # 19:46:01 | EsbenH_ | I prefer to build cross first, and canadian(s) later. |
| # 19:46:16 | EsbenH_ | I build from 1-3 canadians for each bsp/customer |
| # 19:46:31 | EsbenH_ | I don't want to build the same cross more than once. |
| # 19:47:20 | y_morin | EsbenH_: yes, of course. But if the options are multiple booleans rather than a choice, then one could build either cross or canadian, or both. |
| # 19:48:00 | y_morin | EsbenH_: Of course, re-instated using a pre-existing cross would be laready nice! ;-) |
| # 19:54:42 | EsbenH_ | first I need to get coldfire toolchain fully working, and then bringup a demo on the coldfire ev board I have here. |
| # 19:55:18 | EsbenH_ | that should hopefully convince the customer to buy a bsp from us, after which I should get time to look at canadian stuff :-) |
| # 19:55:35 | EsbenH_ | are you coming to ELC-E 2012? |
| # 19:55:47 | y_morin | EsbenH_: Yes I am! |
| # 19:56:39 | y_morin | EsbenH_: But as my GF comes along with me, and she's not into geeking at all, I won't have much time off the conference to stalk along with you guys. |
| # 19:57:07 | y_morin | EsbenH_: but there will be plenty of time to talk during the conference! :-) |
| # 19:57:28 | EsbenH_ | yes, 3 days :-) |
| # 19:57:43 | EsbenH_ | did you get a room on the conference hotel? |
| # 19:58:20 | y_morin | EsbenH_: nope, too much expensive, as I'm on my own (company's not paying this year) |
| # 19:58:51 | EsbenH_ | I haven't booked hotel yet, as the conf hotel was fully booked |
| # 19:58:57 | EsbenH_ | do you have a good suggestion? |
| # 19:59:39 | y_morin | EsbenH_: we're staying there: http://insidebarcelona.com/ |
| # 20:00:26 | y_morin | EsbenH_: looks like a 15-minute walk from the conference. First time there. (first time in Barcelona either). |
| # 20:00:34 | y_morin | either -> as well. |
| # 20:01:39 | y_morin | EsbenH_: that's some apartments, and it looks pretty OK. But I can give no guarantee at all! ;-) |
| # 20:02:34 | smartin | joins #crosstool-ng |
| # 20:02:49 | y_morin | And it's relatively cheap. |
| # 20:02:53 | EsbenH_ | judging from the photos, it looks really nice :-) |
| # 20:03:11 | EsbenH_ | the top-level appartments with private terrace :-D |
| # 20:03:37 | y_morin | EsbenH_: forget about hose! Not really cheap, I guess! ;-) |
| # 20:04:22 | EsbenH_ | well, if company pays, I can invite you for drinks there at night ;-) |
| # 20:05:06 | y_morin | EsbenH_: YEAH! :-) |
| # 20:05:41 | y_morin | EsbenH_: IIRC it's like ~90E per night for a 2-person apartment. |
| # 20:06:10 | EsbenH_ | yep |
| # 20:06:22 | y_morin | 39.94⬠per person per night, plus 10% VAT |
| # 21:50:04 | smartin | quits : Quit: leaving |
| # 21:54:54 | devcoder | joins #crosstool-ng |
| # 22:15:34 | y_morin | quits : Quit: Nighty Night! |
| # 22:17:58 | devcoder | quits : Quit: devcoder |
| # 22:39:04 | ChanServ | quits : *.net *.split |
| # 22:46:36 | ChanServ | joins #crosstool-ng |
| # 22:54:17 | tech | joins #crosstool-ng |
| # 23:42:31 | devcoder | joins #crosstool-ng |