# 01:20:38 |
blueness |
quits : Ping timeout: 264 seconds |
# 01:34:25 |
djerome |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 01:55:07 |
diorcety |
quits : Read error: Connection reset by peer |
# 01:55:36 |
diorcety |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 01:56:10 |
Dacto |
I'll be back in a little bit. |
# 01:56:13 |
Dacto |
quits : Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.90.1 [Firefox 27.0.1/20140212131424] |
# 02:33:17 |
Dacto |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 03:12:54 |
mnt_real |
quits : Ping timeout: 260 seconds |
# 04:27:49 |
mnt_real |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 04:30:45 |
djerome |
quits : Quit: Leaving |
# 05:22:14 |
perr |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 06:35:41 |
perr |
quits : Read error: Connection reset by peer |
# 06:37:41 |
perr |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 06:40:13 |
perr |
quits : Client Quit |
# 06:40:26 |
perr |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 07:16:30 |
perr |
quits : Ping timeout: 260 seconds |
# 07:17:28 |
perr |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 07:31:09 |
perr |
quits : Ping timeout: 252 seconds |
# 07:43:24 |
diorcety |
quits : Quit: Leaving. |
# 08:11:26 |
aalv |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 08:23:45 |
bhundven |
Dacto: back on a clean install. took for ever to restore over usb. |
# 08:25:16 |
perr |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 08:30:29 |
perr |
quits : Ping timeout: 252 seconds |
# 08:38:38 |
perr |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 08:52:05 |
bhundven |
man, what is up with the osuosl servers getting ddos'd |
# 09:31:22 |
perr |
quits : Ping timeout: 260 seconds |
# 09:45:09 |
perr |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 09:55:51 |
memleak |
heh |
# 09:57:13 |
perr |
quits : Read error: Connection reset by peer |
# 09:59:32 |
Net147 |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 10:10:01 |
perr |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 10:43:14 |
perr |
quits : Ping timeout: 260 seconds |
# 10:43:56 |
perr |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 12:11:53 |
hurdman |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 12:11:57 |
hurdman |
hello all |
# 12:26:12 |
blueness |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 12:26:12 |
blueness |
quits : Changing host |
# 12:26:12 |
blueness |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 12:43:29 |
perr |
quits : Ping timeout: 246 seconds |
# 12:46:39 |
Net147 |
quits : Quit: HydraIRC -> http://www.hydrairc.com <- Organize your IRC |
# 12:59:03 |
perr |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 13:26:29 |
perr |
quits : Ping timeout: 240 seconds |
# 13:40:40 |
perr |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 14:26:40 |
Dacto |
quits : Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.90.1 [Firefox 27.0.1/20140212131424] |
# 15:06:05 |
Dacto |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 15:10:30 |
Dacto |
bhundven: I nuked the os and started over. I got farther this time, now it died with a syntax error on python config. |
# 15:10:58 |
Dacto |
s/It got farther/I got farther/ |
# 15:19:01 |
perr |
quits : Ping timeout: 245 seconds |
# 15:32:40 |
perr |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 16:05:49 |
perr |
quits : Quit: Leaving |
# 16:32:55 |
Dacto |
quits : Ping timeout: 272 seconds |
# 16:39:53 |
aalv |
quits : Remote host closed the connection |
# 16:45:23 |
Dacto |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 16:46:05 |
Dacto |
bhundven: it finished successfully! The python issue was due to having python3 instead of python2. |
# 16:46:22 |
Dacto |
thanks for your help. |
# 16:46:37 |
Dacto |
quits : Client Quit |
# 16:47:45 |
y_morin |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 16:52:51 |
ctngbot |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 16:54:22 |
y_morin |
bhundven: Hello! Nothing's wrong with crosstool-ng.org. But in the morning, all OSUOSL-hosted sites were slow as helll. Probably a DoS... |
# 17:46:08 |
sh4rm4 |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 17:53:49 |
sh4rm4 |
quits : Remote host closed the connection |
# 17:53:56 |
sh[4]rm4 |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 17:56:37 |
sh[4]rm4 |
quits : Remote host closed the connection |
# 17:58:40 |
sh[4]rm4 |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 18:01:33 |
sh[4]rm4 |
quits : Remote host closed the connection |
# 18:03:45 |
sh4rm4 |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 18:04:57 |
sh4rm4 |
quits : Remote host closed the connection |
# 18:16:17 |
doc2 |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 18:19:39 |
bhundven |
y_morin: Hah. Idk what happened. I couldn't access ctng or buildroot sites, but I could go to any other site just fine. I went to #osuosl and before they responded everything just started working again. |
# 18:20:31 |
bhundven |
feels like the boy that cried Wolf. |
# 18:44:05 |
y_morin |
bhundven: I had issues too this morning, so maybe a temporary DDoS. |
# 18:50:07 |
bhundven |
Glad Dacto got fixed. He reinstalled his os and got it working. |
# 18:51:03 |
y_morin |
bhundven: So what was the issue, in the end? |
# 18:51:19 |
bhundven |
y_morin: unknown. |
# 18:51:29 |
bhundven |
bad install? |
# 18:52:13 |
y_morin |
bhundven: Ah, OK. |
# 18:52:30 |
bhundven |
y_morin: kind of a cool bash trick I learned last night: http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/use-bash-trap-statement-cleanup-temporary-files |
# 18:52:55 |
y_morin |
bhundven: I use that extensively! :-) |
# 18:53:08 |
bhundven |
I've used trap before, but not like that. |
# 18:55:47 |
y_morin |
bhundven: I even use in ct-ng, see: scripts/functions:116 |
# 18:56:59 |
bhundven |
y_morin: ah, I never looked at that code :) |
# 18:59:22 |
bhundven |
y_morin: I remember the old toolchain script I replaced with ct-ng at watchguard. It was a very long shell script with all of the steps broken out into functions, and at the end of the script was the main loop in a subshell that called all the functions. A separate script for each tuple. |
# 19:01:51 |
bhundven |
The script was based on Dan Kegel's original script, so I thought moving to ct-ng was kind of ironic. |
# 19:02:21 |
y_morin |
s/ironic/a sane decision/ ;-) |
# 19:02:43 |
bhundven |
Ironic, because they are all based on Dan Kegel's scripts |
# 19:03:10 |
y_morin |
bhundven: I was just kidding. Yes, I got the irony! ;-) |
# 19:03:18 |
bhundven |
lol, I know :D |
# 19:07:06 |
mingwandroid |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 19:08:37 |
mingwandroid |
bhundven: ping |
# 19:09:01 |
bhundven |
hey |
# 19:09:08 |
mingwandroid |
how goes it? |
# 19:09:48 |
bhundven |
I'm actually having an hg moment. I need to make a branch in my wip tree |
# 19:10:25 |
bhundven |
so I can push a few of the update patches to y_morin, but keep the multilib stuff in a separate branch till it's done. |
# 19:10:29 |
mingwandroid |
is that not best done as a new mq series? |
# 19:10:44 |
diorcety |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 19:10:52 |
mingwandroid |
bhundven: did you try to compile binutils 2.24.51 btw? |
# 19:12:24 |
bhundven |
yes, it changes every day |
# 19:13:34 |
mingwandroid |
bhundven: oh right, it's not a fixed snapshot then? I got a failure anyway: binutils-2.24.51/binutils/bucomm.c:130:7: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'VPARAMS' |
# 19:14:26 |
bhundven |
yea, last updated: 23.0 MB2/19/14 5:40:00 AM |
# 19:14:42 |
bhundven |
so I have to nuke it from my sources everytime I build with it. |
# 19:15:01 |
bhundven |
there are some patches that HJL is sitting on that he hasn't added to the patch set yet. |
# 19:15:17 |
bhundven |
er, hasn't added to the binutils branch |
# 19:16:10 |
mingwandroid |
right. well, I can switch back to 2.24 anyway. |
# 19:17:27 |
bhundven |
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=b51f1626f645f272f19105c42cdb436381ee6357 |
# 19:17:41 |
bhundven |
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=1651e569b457b0cbd6d0a57c09950166c7503f6b |
# 19:17:53 |
bhundven |
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=1f635d209e61d900a6326aa281e697e31fcdae1e |
# 19:17:56 |
bhundven |
and a few more like it |
# 19:18:35 |
bhundven |
the second one fixes the bucomm.c error |
# 19:22:02 |
bhundven |
but at that point, it's wack-a-mole |
# 19:22:11 |
bhundven |
fix one problem, 4 more pop up |
# 19:22:46 |
bhundven |
I am not pushing my snapshot support, it's just a personal change set I use for future testing. |
# 19:23:03 |
bhundven |
there is a better way to handle that in ct-ng, I just haven't gotten there yet. |
# 19:25:03 |
plhardy |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 19:25:34 |
mingwandroid |
it seems --with-multilib-list was added for arm too, just verifying. |
# 19:25:44 |
bhundven |
in 4.9? |
# 19:26:16 |
bhundven |
y_morin: so, when we moving to git? I just found the one thing I dislike about mercurial: branching :D |
# 19:26:20 |
mingwandroid |
yeah I think you are right, it's not in 4.8.2 |
# 19:28:16 |
plhardy |
hi all, i am unsure if i really want to relaunch my crosstool-ng 1.19 to have a tool chain for igep : my last try ends up in a fork bomb, i had to REISUB my host... |
# 19:29:01 |
bhundven |
igep... fork bomb... REISUB...? |
# 19:29:17 |
bhundven |
idk what you're saying. |
# 19:30:34 |
bhundven |
plhardy: maybe try explaining what you are doing again? |
# 19:33:30 |
plhardy |
well i am trying to play training labs from freelectrons and first step is to regenerate a crosstool-ng toolchain. My board ( that i got in a fromer training with freeelectron is a Isee IGEPv2 ) , soo toolchain was generted using arm-unknown-linux-uclibcgnueabi configuration |
# 19:34:48 |
plhardy |
since i hit problems with mpfr-2.4.2 [ [ERROR] configure.in:294: error: automatic de-ANSI-fication support has been removed ] i used mfpr 3.1.2 |
# 19:34:52 |
bhundven |
plhardy: well, considering: http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2014-February/089789.html |
# 19:35:52 |
bhundven |
it sounds like uclibc is on it's way out of buildroot |
# 19:36:06 |
bhundven |
(or not used as default libc anymore) |
# 19:36:47 |
bhundven |
plhardy: y_morin or kos_tom might have a better insight into helping you with that |
# 19:37:06 |
plhardy |
i tried to compile with GMP 5.1.1 but it didn't work, foolowing another google advice i moved back to a GMP 4.3.2, then ... recompiling another project it went hung, no way to get control on my host, so had to to SysReq usual REISUB... |
# 19:37:27 |
bhundven |
oh, reisub... I get it. |
# 19:39:14 |
plhardy |
yes , in fact my trainer was thomas, the originator of the mail you quote, i am following buildroot, but yet i am one step before: just getting a recent toolchain |
# 19:40:07 |
plhardy |
i will relaunch build, but given same input result in same effects, expect to see me delogging soon ;-) |
# 19:41:32 |
bhundven |
sure, I'm going to continue to say that y_morin or kos_tom (Thomas Petazzoni) are going to be a better help. |
# 19:41:58 |
plhardy |
it went wrong in PPL compilation. |
# 19:42:09 |
smartin_ |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 19:42:21 |
plhardy |
i will play a little... |
# 19:42:25 |
bhundven |
try getting the tip of crosstool-ng: http://crosstool-ng.org/hg/crosstool-ng/archive/tip.tar.bz2 |
# 19:42:40 |
bhundven |
lots of fixes since 1.19.0 |
# 19:42:48 |
mingwandroid |
bhundven: --multilib-list is in latest gcc 4.9 snapshot. |
# 19:42:59 |
bhundven |
mingwandroid: nice |
# 19:43:30 |
bhundven |
mingwandroid: you should be able to use 2.24 (not 2.24.51) for the gcc snapshot. |
# 19:43:37 |
bhundven |
mingwandroid: if you want to work on arch/arm.sh |
# 19:44:10 |
bhundven |
mingwandroid: I'll make a kconfig 'config' that bars multilib on arm until gcc-4.9 |
# 19:44:29 |
mingwandroid |
bhundven: well, I'm wanting to do a big test with arm still of multilib stuff .. |
# 19:45:34 |
bhundven |
in my wip, basic 'x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu' m64/m32/mx32 works. binutils for the target needs to get fixed, and ldscripts is only in sysroot/lib, not in sysroot/lib64, or sysroot/libx32. |
# 19:48:13 |
mingwandroid |
bhundven: ok, do you know what's involved there? |
# 19:49:53 |
mingwandroid |
bhundven: on my multilib arch VM I only have /usr/lib/ldscripts and it contains elf32_x86_64.x and elf_i386.x |
# 19:50:04 |
mingwandroid |
it comes down to what the gcc specs do .. |
# 19:50:50 |
mingwandroid |
.. more compilcation. |
# 19:50:54 |
mingwandroid |
got to eat anyway, bbiab |
# 19:53:26 |
plhardy |
quits : Ping timeout: 260 seconds |
# 19:59:07 |
plhardy |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 19:59:45 |
plhardy |
...back, really this PPL compilation drives my computer crazy. |
# 20:03:46 |
plhardy |
what configuration files should i copy from my current rotten to new crosstool-ng directory to keep my configuration choices; ie this of ct-ng menuconfig ? |
# 20:06:07 |
plhardy |
i did a ./configure --enable-local |
# 20:06:07 |
plhardy |
; make; make install : so it is locally installed |
# 20:08:02 |
plhardy |
OoO i have to learn many things, this tip is a patch over latest version... i though it was a full thing. |
# 20:08:48 |
plhardy |
sorry to polute... |
# 20:10:40 |
bhundven |
it is the whole thing. |
# 20:10:41 |
bhundven |
it's development |
# 20:10:57 |
bhundven |
the whole repository is a collection of patches |
# 20:10:58 |
bhundven |
;) |
# 20:12:09 |
plhardy |
my pride will suffer a lot i think but i have to handle that... |
# 20:16:08 |
plhardy |
well, i had a previous tarball with .configure, reading doc, this one is like a repository one, so i guess configure should be generate with bootstrap. it is what i missed |
# 20:40:50 |
bhundven |
y_morin: here is my git repo: https://bitbucket.org/bhundven/crosstool-ng |
# 20:58:25 |
y_morin |
bhundven: Sorry, I'm catching up... |
# 20:59:01 |
y_morin |
bhundven: Before we migrate over to git, I need to first update the machine. |
# 20:59:20 |
y_morin |
bhundven: But since it has been ~3 years since it has been installed, I need to be carefull in doing so. |
# 20:59:22 |
bhundven |
sure. I'm working on some changes in my 'switch_to_git' branch |
# 21:00:25 |
y_morin |
bhundven: I need to find a moment where I can get a few hours straight without disturbance to do the upgrade, and I'd rather not do that the WE, so the OSUOSL folk are available and can help if something goes amiss... |
# 21:01:25 |
bhundven |
I mean, getting scripts/mk-release and other changes ready for when it does happen |
# 21:01:46 |
y_morin |
bhundven: Oh, that's not what I'm most worried about! ;-) |
# 21:02:09 |
bhundven |
y_morin: sorry, I must have misunderstood. |
# 21:02:58 |
bhundven |
y_morin: I'm not saying "this is where we should host git", just "updating the source to be ready for you". |
# 21:02:59 |
y_morin |
bhundven: What I most wiorry about are: 1) access to the machine after the upgrade (he, debian ssh keys, anyone? ;-] ), the content of the website (I already suffered from a dokuwiki upgrade in the past)... |
# 21:03:15 |
y_morin |
bhundven: Yes, I already have a git tree here! ;-) |
# 21:03:20 |
bhundven |
ah |
# 21:03:23 |
bhundven |
ok |
# 21:03:35 |
y_morin |
bhundven: But thanks for the help! ;-) |
# 21:04:11 |
bhundven |
ok, I'll not get distracted by that shinny light then |
# 21:04:15 |
y_morin |
bhundven: Also, I made some changes on the machine without properly documenting them. And they are coming back at me to bite me... |
# 21:04:42 |
y_morin |
bhundven: But since you're doing the changes to mk-release and stuff, I won't have to do it! :-) |
# 21:04:55 |
bhundven |
k |
# 21:05:34 |
bhundven |
there are some updates in patchworks, and I have some, but I need to break them out from the multilib stuff in my wip queue |
# 21:05:57 |
bhundven |
wanted to get some of that in for next rel, 1.20.0? |
# 21:06:17 |
y_morin |
bhundven: The updates, sure. |
# 21:06:27 |
bhundven |
figure multilib and refactor stuff is for 2.x.x |
# 21:06:29 |
y_morin |
bhundven: The multilib, not really: I want to cut a release next WE. |
# 21:06:36 |
bhundven |
;) yup |
# 21:07:08 |
bhundven |
or however you want to cut version :D |
# 21:07:11 |
y_morin |
bhundven: Yes. And probably a change in the naming scheme (eg. like Buildroot does seems nice: 2014.02) |
# 21:07:20 |
bhundven |
hmm |
# 21:08:07 |
y_morin |
bhundven: The Major.minor.sub is not really appropriate nowadays, since we're doing (at least trying to do) time-base released... |
# 21:08:14 |
bhundven |
right |
# 21:08:21 |
bhundven |
if they happen on time ;) |
# 21:08:23 |
bhundven |
linaro does the same |
# 21:08:26 |
y_morin |
hides... |
# 21:08:31 |
bhundven |
hahahahaha |
# 21:08:38 |
y_morin |
mumbles something about time dilatation... |
# 21:08:48 |
bhundven |
nah, everyone here see's your work on BR |
# 21:08:55 |
bhundven |
we know you're busy |
# 21:09:09 |
bhundven |
I remember you saying you had some home projects too |
# 21:09:14 |
y_morin |
bhundven: Thanks, but this is not an excuse. |
# 21:09:27 |
y_morin |
bhundven: Yes, home is sucking quite a bit of time... |
# 21:09:54 |
bhundven |
I'm happy to help with patchworks or sysadmin tasks if you need help |
# 21:10:01 |
y_morin |
bhundven: Thanks |
# 21:18:34 |
plhardy |
i disabled GRAPHITE loop optimization, hoping it will not require this PPL anymore... |
# 21:22:11 |
plhardy |
is there some benchmark of gcc with/without GRAPHITE loop optimization for ARM ? i saw one for i7 only ( http://yuguangzhang.com/blog/phoronix-gcc-graphite-and-lto-benchmarks/ ) |
# 21:40:12 |
plhardy |
at least it completes without gcc GRAPHITE loop, so i can continue my lab ;-) [ i have to dig deeper, it seems that even if i changed PPL version to 11.0 it kept 10.2, so my re-test did change nothing ] |
# 21:41:06 |
plhardy |
but before, i will go to bed ! bye bye everybody |
# 21:41:30 |
plhardy |
parts #crosstool-ng |
# 21:52:56 |
mingwandroid |
bhundven: y_morin: so I ran into gnumake 4 incompat. issues again .. |
# 21:55:14 |
mingwandroid |
bhundven: shall I just add a to our patch queue to allow gnumake 4 for a few {e}glibcs? |
# 21:55:41 |
y_morin |
mingwandroid: make-4: as timely as Duke Nukem Forever; as usefull as the Hurd; as broken as, hmmm. let see... ;-] |
# 21:56:09 |
mingwandroid |
now now! --output-sync is nice enough. |
# 21:56:35 |
y_morin |
mingwandroid: Granted. Also, the randomisation of thargets is nice to catch missing dependencies. |
# 21:56:41 |
y_morin |
&targets |
# 21:56:47 |
mingwandroid |
didn't know about that option? |
# 21:57:00 |
y_morin |
mingwandroid: Sorry? |
# 21:57:14 |
mingwandroid |
randomisation of targets, I didn't know about that one. |
# 21:58:06 |
y_morin |
mingwandroid: Until make-3.82, targets were evaluated 'in-order'. Eg., shell globs would return 'a b c', for example. |
# 21:58:16 |
mingwandroid |
y_morin: yeah, I can figure out what it does ;-) |
# 21:58:29 |
y_morin |
mingwandroid: With make-4, it would return 'b a c', or 'c b a' or whatever... |
# 21:58:45 |
mingwandroid |
y_morin: is there a way to disable that? |
# 21:58:46 |
y_morin |
mingwandroid: There is no option for that. It's the defaulkt and only behaviour. |
# 21:58:55 |
y_morin |
(IIRC) |
# 21:58:59 |
mingwandroid |
y_morin: mental! |
# 22:00:07 |
mingwandroid |
y_morin: what's the plan wrt it then? would tiny patches for lots of {e}glibcs be acceptable? |
# 22:00:30 |
y_morin |
mingwandroid: OTOH, they were relatively free to do this change, this the previous behaviour was never documented, and the bumped to a new major version. |
# 22:00:54 |
y_morin |
mingwandroid: No. WE have the companion tools for that. It would build a trusty make-3.81. |
# 22:01:26 |
mingwandroid |
y_morin: we don't have a companion tool for gnumake do we? |
# 22:01:42 |
y_morin |
mingwandroid: We might want to add a check in ./configure however, and if we detect make-3.82+ we force building our own make-3.81 |
# 22:02:18 |
y_morin |
mingwandroid: I don't know what you're calling 'gnumake', but we do have GNU make, yes. |
# 22:05:12 |
mingwandroid |
y_morin: do you that we should detect during .config generation? |
# 22:06:46 |
mingwandroid |
*do you mean |
# 22:08:15 |
doc2 |
quits : Remote host closed the connection |
# 22:08:17 |
y_morin |
mingwandroid: No, at the time we run ./configure. |
# 22:17:24 |
mingwandroid |
y_morin: ok, I changed the existing detection logic in configure.ac: http://paste.kde.org/pvfvl253m |
# 22:17:58 |
mingwandroid |
y_morin: is there any existing reference for getting stuff from config.status into .config, which is, I guess the next step? |
# 22:18:07 |
y_morin |
mingwandroid: Except we do not want to fail. |
# 22:18:16 |
y_morin |
mingwandroid: Yes, see, just a sec... |
# 22:18:21 |
mingwandroid |
y_morin: yeah, granted ;-) |
# 22:19:05 |
y_morin |
mingwandroid: http://crosstool-ng.org/hg/crosstool-ng/file/defadbff9afd/configure.ac#l50 |
# 22:19:08 |
y_morin |
mingwandroid: http://crosstool-ng.org/hg/crosstool-ng/file/defadbff9afd/configure.ac#l277 |
# 22:19:34 |
mingwandroid |
y_morin: I AC_MSG_WARN'd it. |
# 22:20:23 |
y_morin |
mingwandroid: mingwandroid Also, make the test a bit tighter: we want 3.81, not 3.82 (since it has its own problems, too. |
# 22:20:35 |
mingwandroid |
y_morin: ok. |
# 22:21:09 |
y_morin |
mingwandroid: And no need to AC_MSG_WARN, just answer 'no' to "Checking for make-3.81" |
# 22:21:19 |
mingwandroid |
ok. |
# 22:21:37 |
y_morin |
mingwandroid: Then you'll need a bit of a trick to force the make companion tools in this case. |
# 22:22:22 |
mingwandroid |
no way to get that just via ACX_SET_KCONFIG_OPTION? |
# 22:22:38 |
y_morin |
mingwandroid: That only setx the CT_HAS_make option. |
# 22:22:54 |
y_morin |
mingwandroid: You'll want to add something like: [hold on a sec...] |
# 22:23:50 |
y_morin |
mingwandroid: ... like: http://code.bulix.org/r80xu2-85676 somewhere in the existing config files. |
# 22:32:50 |
mingwandroid |
companion_tools.in? |
# 22:36:15 |
y_morin |
mingwandroid: Yes, looks like an appropriate place, indeed. ;-) |
# 22:36:19 |
mingwandroid |
y_morin: this is the bit I have least knowledge about, the config stuff confuses me a bit! |
# 22:40:18 |
y_morin |
mingwandroid: In fact, the option would be named: CONFIGURE_has_make |
# 22:40:26 |
mingwandroid |
yup. |
# 22:40:29 |
mingwandroid |
found that from the SVN stuff. |
# 22:42:27 |
y_morin |
mingwandroid: Maybe the first thing would be to: http://code.bulix.org/qszmu2-85677 |
# 22:42:43 |
y_morin |
(ie. remove the EXPERIMENTAL setting on companion tools) |
# 22:43:01 |
mingwandroid |
y_morin: yeah. I was forcing experimental on, but I think companion tools are needed. |
# 22:43:23 |
y_morin |
mingwandroid: Yes, we do nopt want companion tools to be experimental anymore. |
# 22:43:41 |
mingwandroid |
y_morin: all part of the same patch or do you want it broken up? |
# 22:44:36 |
y_morin |
mingwandroid: First patch to remove EXPERIMENTAL, second patch to detect and force make. |
# 22:44:40 |
sh4rm4 |
joins #crosstool-ng |
# 22:48:06 |
mingwandroid |
damn, now I hit a patching failure using qpush / qpop. |
# 22:50:45 |
mingwandroid |
y_morin: so I was considering making a crosstool-ng release for MSYS2, but I'm guessing given what I've just done re: GNU make, that'd be a bad idea and it msut always be run from ./configure on the build machine? |
# 22:56:06 |
y_morin |
mingwandroid: Yes. |
# 22:56:39 |
y_morin |
mingwandroid: crosstool-Ng does not handle the case for cross-compilation of itself. |
# 22:57:11 |
y_morin |
mingwandroid: This would be very hard to achieve, since crosstool-Ng mostly rely on programs, not headers/libs. |
# 22:57:32 |
y_morin |
mingwandroid: And there is no provision in the autotools to properly handle this case. |
# 22:57:47 |
y_morin |
(eg. looking for programs needed at runtime, not build time). |
# 22:58:13 |
mingwandroid |
it's fine, I'll package it the same way you do. |
# 23:07:56 |
y_morin |
quits : Quit: Nighty Night! |
# 23:19:42 |
bhundven |
sorry, I was vacant because of work stuff. |
# 23:20:08 |
bhundven |
I have to concentrate on that for a while, but I'll come back and chat in a bit. |
# 23:25:33 |
mingwandroid |
hmm. |
# 23:25:46 |
mingwandroid |
config/companion_tools.in:5: missing end statement for this entry |
# 23:25:46 |
mingwandroid |
config/companion_tools.in:5: invalid statement |
# 23:25:46 |
mingwandroid |
config/companion_tools.in:6: unexpected option "select" |
# 23:25:46 |
mingwandroid |
config/companion_tools.in:7: unexpected option "select" |
# 23:25:46 |
mingwandroid |
config/companion_tools.in:9: invalid statement |
# 23:26:47 |
smartin_ |
quits : Quit: good night |
# 23:26:51 |
mingwandroid |
from: http://paste.kde.org/pa5xnp5sp |