| # 07:42:38 | imMute | quits : Ping timeout: 246 seconds |
| # 08:00:59 | imMute | joins #crosstool-ng |
| # 08:00:59 | imMute | quits : Changing host |
| # 08:00:59 | imMute | joins #crosstool-ng |
| # 09:33:05 | joko | quits : Changing host |
| # 09:33:05 | joko | joins #crosstool-ng |
| # 10:14:41 | alkino | joins #crosstool-ng |
| # 10:14:45 | alkino | hi o/ |
| # 10:15:22 | alkino | Some years ago https://github.com/diorcety/crosstool-ng propose to include clang in crosstool-ng. It has been refused because "clang doesn't support enough target". |
| # 10:15:28 | alkino | what do you think about it, today. |
| # 10:16:13 | alkino | https://sourceware.org/ml/crossgcc/2012-11/msg00078.html <= thread in 2012 |
| # 10:49:41 | diorcety | joins #crosstool-ng |
| # 11:19:08 | bhundven | I never said: "clang doesn't support enough target" |
| # 11:20:01 | bhundven | alkino: afaiu, diorcety and mingwandroid are still working on supporting llvm/clang, but there are some prerequisites that I have before llvm/clang support is added. |
| # 11:21:00 | bhundven | I have been working to clean up crosstool-ng and make the gcc build simpler, that way adding llvm will be easier to maintain in the future. |
| # 11:21:07 | joko | parts #crosstool-ng |
| # 11:21:54 | bhundven | s/adding llvm will be easier to/adding llvm will be easier and easier to/ |
| # 11:44:02 | alkino | bhundven: I see it CC => GCC for example |
| # 12:17:59 | enunes | joins #crosstool-ng |
| # 13:56:51 | enunes | quits : Read error: Connection reset by peer |
| # 14:05:20 | enunes | joins #crosstool-ng |
| # 17:03:44 | alkino | quits : Quit: WeeChat 1.3 |
| # 17:16:23 | diorcety | quits : Ping timeout: 264 seconds |
| # 17:28:04 | bhundven | I guess people are back from holiday... |
| # 17:28:15 | enunes | quits : Read error: Connection reset by peer |
| # 17:29:02 | enunes | joins #crosstool-ng |
| # 17:30:17 | bhundven | hey enunes |
| # 17:31:02 | enunes | hi bhundven |
| # 17:37:07 | bhundven | I had gotten lost for a few years doing systems admin stuff... I found myself the last few weeks remembering how to hack on u-boot and playing with buildroot and the linux kernel. feeling like a normal bryan again. :D |
| # 17:40:41 | bhundven | got all my old boards out again. p1020rdb, ixp435. some of my others raspberry pi b+, galileo, and my two efm32 boards efm32gg and the efm32tg starter... still need to dig out the cavium octeonII |
| # 17:41:15 | enunes | quits : Read error: Connection reset by peer |
| # 17:41:45 | enunes | joins #crosstool-ng |
| # 17:41:49 | bhundven | hrm, I don't remember if it's the cn6 or cn5 octeon... I think the cn5 is octeon plus. |
| # 17:41:59 | enunes | bhundven: well that's a lot of boards |
| # 17:42:22 | bhundven | I used to have 8 sparc-stations |
| # 17:42:33 | bhundven | and an sgi challenge s |
| # 17:42:44 | bhundven | (bleh, irix...) |
| # 17:44:44 | enunes | bhundven: some of these seem to be quite professional such as the p1020rdb |
| # 17:45:27 | bhundven | sadly, I have the older p1020rdb-pb |
| # 17:46:27 | bhundven | but I'm trying to re-add the board for p1020rdb-bp... little wip branch: https://github.com/bhundven/u-boot/tree/p1_p2_rdb-wip |
| # 17:47:50 | bhundven | I'm hoping to minimize it's add to the p1_p2_rdb_pc board. |
| # 17:48:17 | bhundven | then move p1_p2_rdb_pc back to p1_p2_rdb (since it would then have pb, pc, and pd) |
| # 17:48:49 | bhundven | pa doesn't make sense to add |
| # 17:48:56 | bhundven | since it was so early |
| # 17:49:25 | enunes | bhundven: that's cool, btw one of the products I work with still uses a p1020 |
| # 17:49:57 | bhundven | but hey, I built a new ct-ng toolchain and ran the test suite on the board with latest components. It did pretty well. |
| # 17:50:06 | bhundven | e500v2 |
| # 17:50:07 | bhundven | :D |
| # 17:50:15 | enunes | bhundven: it's built with a crosstool-ng e500v2 toolchain ;) |
| # 17:50:25 | bhundven | nice |
| # 17:50:27 | bhundven | :) |
| # 17:51:08 | bhundven | yea, I did a lot of custom integration 2010-2012 for a company I worked for... |
| # 17:51:32 | bhundven | p1011, p1020, p2020, and p4080 |
| # 17:52:08 | bhundven | p4080 was a beast |
| # 17:52:33 | bhundven | but they ended up replacing it in the product line with x86_64... |
| # 17:57:49 | enunes | was it better to work with x86_64? |
| # 17:58:22 | bhundven | not as much fun |
| # 17:58:24 | enunes | I have seen about the same happen, but here they ended up keeping the higher end powerpc lines |
| # 18:00:11 | bhundven | I'll tag the decision as more political/business related, then which architecture to use... |
| # 18:38:27 | enunes | quits : Quit: Lost terminal |
| # 18:42:55 | enunes | joins #crosstool-ng |
| # 18:44:36 | enunes | bhundven: this is the most I've been hacking lately: http://i.imgur.com/YHJJ7YP.jpg |
| # 18:48:12 | diorcety | joins #crosstool-ng |
| # 18:49:42 | enunes | other than that just some stuff on FPGA with linux on MicroBlaze, but then it's more HDL than kernel |
| # 19:25:27 | enunes | quits : Quit: leaving |
| # 21:55:00 | enunes | joins #crosstool-ng |