| # 02:04:21 | cpackham | quits : Ping timeout: 252 seconds |
| # 02:05:02 | cpackham | joins #crosstool-ng |
| # 04:39:26 | cpackham | quits : Ping timeout: 264 seconds |
| # 06:17:04 | cpackham | joins #crosstool-ng |
| # 06:47:42 | cpackham | quits : Ping timeout: 255 seconds |
| # 19:33:07 | cpackham | joins #crosstool-ng |
| # 20:06:19 | bhundven | bleh, renaming the branch deletes the old PR |
| # 20:06:41 | bhundven | kinda wish github would do the right thing with renaming branches |
| # 20:13:33 | cpackham | github gonna github |
| # 20:13:53 | cpackham | that's why I ended up with a bunutils branch |
| # 20:13:54 | bhundven | anyways, new PR for strace 6.8 |
| # 20:13:59 | bhundven | hehe |
| # 20:14:01 | bhundven | yea |
| # 20:15:06 | cpackham | Do you want to throw in a commit to drop 6.6? |
| # 20:15:20 | bhundven | and 6.4 |
| # 20:15:22 | bhundven | ? |
| # 20:15:32 | cpackham | need to keep 6.4 as oboslete |
| # 20:15:42 | cpackham | but we'd drop it after the next release |
| # 20:16:00 | cpackham | and need is a strong word |
| # 20:16:32 | cpackham | but we've said that our policy is not to remove versions that were in the previous ct-ng release |
| # 20:16:41 | bhundven | added a commit to drop strace-6.6 |
| # 20:22:12 | cpackham | MrFreeman: milkylanien: (having just looked at the IRC logs) I don't know anything about 80960/i960 but if it's supported by gcc/glibc/binutils is should be doable to add. |
| # 20:24:31 | cpackham | I think the last one added was loongson so take a look at the changes related to that |
| # 20:46:58 | milkylainen | I took a closer look. It doesn't seem like it's supported anymore. Looks like the last gcc to be able to do anything useful for it was 2.9x something. And that's like 20+ years ago? |
| # 20:47:13 | milkylainen | Hi btw. :) |
| # 20:49:24 | milkylainen | Anecdotal seems like 3.x gcc was broken for i960 and it was removed soon afterwards? |
| # 20:57:49 | milkylainen | https://www.righto.com/2023/07/the-complex-history-of-intel-i960-risc.html |
| # 23:03:29 | cpackham | OK something for the digital archivists. Not really something we want to have in ct-ng then |
| # 23:38:10 | MrFreeman | Ha, that's what I thought. Oh well, was worth checking then. |
| # 23:40:00 | MrFreeman | quits : Quit: Leaving |