binutils/binutils: forward-port the patchset from 2.20 to 2.20.1

Among other things, this should fix the issue reported by Thomas at:
  http://sourceware.org/ml/crossgcc/2010-08/msg00115.html

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

1 files changed, 18 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/patches/binutils/2.20.1/200-document-new-dtags-behaviour.patch b/patches/binutils/2.20.1/200-document-new-dtags-behaviour.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3bb5767
--- /dev/null
+++ b/patches/binutils/2.20.1/200-document-new-dtags-behaviour.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+Index: binutils-2.19.51.0.5/ld/ld.texinfo
+===================================================================
+
+diff -durN binutils-2.20.1.orig/ld/ld.texinfo binutils-2.20.1/ld/ld.texinfo
+--- binutils-2.20.1.orig/ld/ld.texinfo	2009-07-06 15:48:51.000000000 +0200
++++ binutils-2.20.1/ld/ld.texinfo	2010-08-17 19:32:16.000000000 +0200
+@@ -2026,8 +2026,9 @@
+ systems may not understand them. If you specify
+ @option{--enable-new-dtags}, the dynamic tags will be created as needed.
+ If you specify @option{--disable-new-dtags}, no new dynamic tags will be
+-created. By default, the new dynamic tags are not created. Note that
+-those options are only available for ELF systems.
++created. On Gentoo, by default, the new dynamic tags are created (this
++differs from upstream behaviour). Note that those options are only
++available for ELF systems.
+ 
+ @kindex --hash-size=@var{number}
+ @item --hash-size=@var{number}