diff options
author | Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@gmail.com> | 2015-10-29 23:16:51 (GMT) |
---|---|---|
committer | Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@gmail.com> | 2015-10-31 19:17:35 (GMT) |
commit | 1a25115a1851d3defdf4d37825d8a291be078e53 (patch) | |
tree | 5d162f6cc7b9274f640584a63d337ec455bd0613 /patches/gcc/4.3.1/160-flatten-switch-stmt-00.patch | |
parent | 55d8497fea996b070d8e7f6f6898e99e9981337a (diff) |
gcc: Support only the latest branch releases of gcc
This change, as per #222, reduces the number of supported releases of
gcc to the latest branch releases.
I noticed while doing this work that gcc-4.5.4 was never added, so I
moved patches for gcc-4.5.3 to 4.5.4 and updated the
bfin-unknown-linux-uclibc example. Also, 120-siginfo.patch was fixed
upstream in the 4.5.4 release, so this patch is omitted.
I also bumped the avr sample to 4.9.3 from 4.9.2.
With the addition of gcc-5.x, the gcc release team now releases the
major.minor.0 versions, while updates to the branch are available in
svn/git. We'll address that when we get to issue #219. This change just
removes CC_GCC_5_1 and moves CC_GCC_5_2 to CC_GCC_5, and removes
CC_GCC_5_1_or_later and moves CC_GCC_5_2_or_later to CC_GCC_5_or_later.
This is the first of two part changes, as mentioned in #222.
This change is slated for release in 1.22.0. The next change will be
slated for 1.23.0, and will limit gcc versions to what is on
https://gcc.gnu.org under "Release Series and Status", which is
currently 4.9.3 and 5.2.0, although I will also support the previous
supported version. In this example that would be 4.8.5.
Last, but not least, this change also retires AVR32 support.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'patches/gcc/4.3.1/160-flatten-switch-stmt-00.patch')
-rw-r--r-- | patches/gcc/4.3.1/160-flatten-switch-stmt-00.patch | 76 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 76 deletions
diff --git a/patches/gcc/4.3.1/160-flatten-switch-stmt-00.patch b/patches/gcc/4.3.1/160-flatten-switch-stmt-00.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 55cafcb..0000000 --- a/patches/gcc/4.3.1/160-flatten-switch-stmt-00.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,76 +0,0 @@ -Original patch from gentoo: gentoo/src/patchsets/gcc/4.3.1/gentoo/18_all_904-flatten-switch-stmt-00.patch -http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-04/msg00927.html - -Hi, - -The attached patch makes sure that we create smaller object code for -simple switch statements. We just make sure to flatten the switch -statement into an if-else chain, basically. - -This fixes a size-regression as compared to gcc-3.4, as can be seen -below. - -2007-04-15 Bernhard Fischer <..> - - * stmt.c (expand_case): Do not create a complex binary tree when - optimizing for size but rather use the simple ordered list. - (emit_case_nodes): do not emit jumps to the default_label when - optimizing for size. - -Not regtested so far. -Comments? - -Attached is the test switch.c mentioned below. - -$ for i in 2.95 3.3 3.4 4.0 4.1 4.2.orig-HEAD 4.3.orig-HEAD 4.3-HEAD;do -gcc-$i -DCHAIN -Os -o switch-CHAIN-$i.o -c switch.c ;done -$ for i in 2.95 3.3 3.4 4.0 4.1 4.2.orig-HEAD 4.3.orig-HEAD 4.3-HEAD;do -gcc-$i -UCHAIN -Os -o switch-$i.o -c switch.c ;done - -$ size switch-*.o - text data bss dec hex filename - 169 0 0 169 a9 switch-2.95.o - 115 0 0 115 73 switch-3.3.o - 103 0 0 103 67 switch-3.4.o - 124 0 0 124 7c switch-4.0.o - 124 0 0 124 7c switch-4.1.o - 124 0 0 124 7c switch-4.2.orig-HEAD.o - 95 0 0 95 5f switch-4.3-HEAD.o - 124 0 0 124 7c switch-4.3.orig-HEAD.o - 166 0 0 166 a6 switch-CHAIN-2.95.o - 111 0 0 111 6f switch-CHAIN-3.3.o - 95 0 0 95 5f switch-CHAIN-3.4.o - 95 0 0 95 5f switch-CHAIN-4.0.o - 95 0 0 95 5f switch-CHAIN-4.1.o - 95 0 0 95 5f switch-CHAIN-4.2.orig-HEAD.o - 95 0 0 95 5f switch-CHAIN-4.3-HEAD.o - 95 0 0 95 5f switch-CHAIN-4.3.orig-HEAD.o - - -Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=us-ascii -Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="gcc-4.3.gcc-flatten-switch-stmt.00.diff" - -diff -durN gcc-4.3.1.orig/gcc/stmt.c gcc-4.3.1/gcc/stmt.c ---- gcc-4.3.1.orig/gcc/stmt.c 2008-05-09 20:12:13.000000000 +0200 -+++ gcc-4.3.1/gcc/stmt.c 2008-06-10 14:57:58.000000000 +0200 -@@ -2509,7 +2509,11 @@ - use_cost_table - = (TREE_CODE (orig_type) != ENUMERAL_TYPE - && estimate_case_costs (case_list)); -- balance_case_nodes (&case_list, NULL); -+ /* When optimizing for size, we want a straight list to avoid -+ jumps as much as possible. This basically creates an if-else -+ chain. */ -+ if (!optimize_size) -+ balance_case_nodes (&case_list, NULL); - emit_case_nodes (index, case_list, default_label, index_type); - emit_jump (default_label); - } -@@ -3067,6 +3071,7 @@ - { - if (!node_has_low_bound (node, index_type)) - { -+ if (!optimize_size) /* don't jl to the .default_label. */ - emit_cmp_and_jump_insns (index, - convert_modes - (mode, imode, |