diff options
| author |   Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> | 2007-02-24 11:00:05 (GMT) |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> | 2007-02-24 11:00:05 (GMT) |
| commit | 1906cf93f86d8d66f45f90380a8d3da25c087ee5 (patch) | |
| tree | 90916c99abe1f1ec26709ee420e6c349eda4670a /patches/glibc/2.1.3/glibc-manual-stdin.texi-1.127.patch | |
| parent | 2609573aede4ce198b3462976725b25eb1637d2e (diff) | |
Add the full crosstool-NG sources to the new repository of its own.
You might just say: 'Yeah! crosstool-NG's got its own repo!".
Unfortunately, that's because the previous repo got damaged beyond repair and I had no backup.
That means I'm putting backups in place in the afternoon.
That also means we've lost history... :-(
Diffstat (limited to 'patches/glibc/2.1.3/glibc-manual-stdin.texi-1.127.patch')
| -rw-r--r-- | patches/glibc/2.1.3/glibc-manual-stdin.texi-1.127.patch | 26 |
1 files changed, 26 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/patches/glibc/2.1.3/glibc-manual-stdin.texi-1.127.patch b/patches/glibc/2.1.3/glibc-manual-stdin.texi-1.127.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1ed6480 --- /dev/null +++ b/patches/glibc/2.1.3/glibc-manual-stdin.texi-1.127.patch @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ +Fixes +./stdio.texi:2491: First argument to cross-reference may not be empty. +./stdio.texi:2492: First argument to cross-reference may not be empty. +makeinfo: Removing output file `/home/dank/crosstool-0.25/build/arm-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc-2.95.3-glibc-2.1.3/glibc-2.1.3/manual/libc.info' due to errors; use --force to preserve. +make[2]: *** [libc.info] Error 2 + +Patch from glib-2.2; Line numbers adjusted. + +=================================================================== +RCS file: /cvs/glibc/libc/manual/stdio.texi,v +retrieving revision 1.126 +retrieving revision 1.127 +diff -u -r1.126 -r1.127 +--- libc/manual/stdio.texi 2001/06/06 07:11:00 ++++ libc/manual/stdio.texi 2001/07/31 18:57:00 +@@ -2487,8 +2487,8 @@ + If you are trying to read input that doesn't match a single, fixed + pattern, you may be better off using a tool such as Flex to generate a + lexical scanner, or Bison to generate a parser, rather than using +-@code{scanf}. For more information about these tools, see @ref{, , , +-flex.info, Flex: The Lexical Scanner Generator}, and @ref{, , , ++@code{scanf}. For more information about these tools, see @ref{Top, , , ++flex.info, Flex: The Lexical Scanner Generator}, and @ref{Top, , , + bison.info, The Bison Reference Manual}. + + @node Input Conversion Syntax |