summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/patches/binutils/2.15.90.0.3/binutils-20040820-duplicates.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'patches/binutils/2.15.90.0.3/binutils-20040820-duplicates.patch')
-rw-r--r--patches/binutils/2.15.90.0.3/binutils-20040820-duplicates.patch74
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 74 deletions
diff --git a/patches/binutils/2.15.90.0.3/binutils-20040820-duplicates.patch b/patches/binutils/2.15.90.0.3/binutils-20040820-duplicates.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 03f6453..0000000
--- a/patches/binutils/2.15.90.0.3/binutils-20040820-duplicates.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,74 +0,0 @@
-See http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2004-08/msg00256.html
-
-Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 21:13:43 -0400
-From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
-To: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
-Subject: Re: Handle SEC_LINK_DUPLICATES_SAME_CONTENTS for arm-linux
-Message-ID: <20040821011342.GA30319@nevyn.them.org>
-Mail-Followup-To: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
-References: <20040818145518.GA9774@nevyn.them.org> <20040819055040.GA11820@lucon.org> <20040819080034.GE21716@bubble.modra.org> <20040820173240.GA17678@nevyn.them.org> <20040821003737.GB16016@bubble.modra.org>
-In-Reply-To: <20040821003737 dot GB16016 at bubble dot modra dot org>
-
-On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 10:07:38AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
-> On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 01:32:40PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
-> > Thanks. How's this?
->
-> As you might have guessed from my rather slack review of your previous
-> patch, I trust you enough to give the OK without proper review. But
-> since you asked... :)
-
-Checked in as so.
-
---
-Daniel Jacobowitz
-
-2004-08-20 Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
-
- * elflink.c (_bfd_elf_section_already_linked): Handle
- SEC_LINK_DUPLICATES_SAME_CONTENTS.
-
-Index: elflink.c
-===================================================================
-RCS file: /big/fsf/rsync/src-cvs/src/bfd/elflink.c,v
-retrieving revision 1.97
-diff -u -p -r1.97 elflink.c
---- binutils/bfd/elflink.c 18 Aug 2004 02:45:42 -0000 1.97
-+++ binutils/bfd/elflink.c 21 Aug 2004 00:59:08 -0000
-@@ -9366,6 +9366,36 @@ _bfd_elf_section_already_linked (bfd *ab
- (_("%B: duplicate section `%A' has different size\n"),
- abfd, sec);
- break;
-+
-+ case SEC_LINK_DUPLICATES_SAME_CONTENTS:
-+ if (sec->size != l->sec->size)
-+ (*_bfd_error_handler)
-+ (_("%B: duplicate section `%A' has different size\n"),
-+ abfd, sec);
-+ else if (sec->size != 0)
-+ {
-+ bfd_byte *sec_contents, *l_sec_contents;
-+
-+ if (!bfd_malloc_and_get_section (abfd, sec, &sec_contents))
-+ (*_bfd_error_handler)
-+ (_("%B: warning: could not read contents of section `%A'\n"),
-+ abfd, sec);
-+ else if (!bfd_malloc_and_get_section (l->sec->owner, l->sec,
-+ &l_sec_contents))
-+ (*_bfd_error_handler)
-+ (_("%B: warning: could not read contents of section `%A'\n"),
-+ l->sec->owner, l->sec);
-+ else if (memcmp (sec_contents, l_sec_contents, sec->size) != 0)
-+ (*_bfd_error_handler)
-+ (_("%B: warning: duplicate section `%A' has different contents\n"),
-+ abfd, sec);
-+
-+ if (sec_contents)
-+ free (sec_contents);
-+ if (l_sec_contents)
-+ free (l_sec_contents);
-+ }
-+ break;
- }
-
- /* Set the output_section field so that lang_add_section
-