diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'patches/binutils/2.15.91.0.2')
3 files changed, 0 insertions, 287 deletions
diff --git a/patches/binutils/2.15.91.0.2/binutils-20040817-linkonce.patch b/patches/binutils/2.15.91.0.2/binutils-20040817-linkonce.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 97fa6ee..0000000 --- a/patches/binutils/2.15.91.0.2/binutils-20040817-linkonce.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,118 +0,0 @@ -From http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2004-08/msg00190.html - -Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 12:04:29 +0200 -From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com> -To: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com -Subject: [PATCH] Fix `defined in discarded section' errors when building ia64 gcc -Message-ID: <20040817100429.GL30497@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> -Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com> -References: <20040817090201.GK30497@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> -In-Reply-To: <20040817090201 dot GK30497 at sunsite dot ms dot mff dot cuni dot cz> - -On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 11:02:01AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: -> Current gcc 3.4.x (at least gcc-3_4-rhl-branch) doesn't build with CVS -> binutils (nor 2.15.91.0.2). -> The problem is that libstdc++.so linking fails with: -> `.gnu.linkonce.t._ZNSdD2Ev' referenced in section `.gnu.linkonce.ia64unw._ZNSdD2Ev' of .libs/sstream-inst.o: defined in discarded section `.gnu.linkonce.t._ZNSdD2Ev' of .libs/sstream-inst.o -> The problem is that both io-inst.s and sstream-inst.s have -> .gnu.linkonce.t._ZNSdD2Ev definition, but because io-inst.cc -> also instantiates some templates sstream-inst.cc doesn't instantiate, -> the inliner can do a better job in io-inst.cc. -> The result is that _ZNSdD2Ev in io-inst.cc is a leaf routine, while -> it is not in sstream-inst.cc (in assembly, -> _ZNSdD2Ev in io-inst.s starts with .prologue and no .save directives, -> while _ZNSdD2Ev] in sstream-inst.s has .prologue 12, 35 and some -> .save directives. -> IA-64 ABI allows leaf routines to have no unwind section at all, -> which means .gnu.linkonce.ia64unw._ZNSdD2Ev is not created in -> io-inst.o at all and as .gnu.linkonce.t._ZNSdD2Ev comes first -> and wins, .gnu.linkonce.ia64unw._ZNSdD2Ev in sstream.o suddenly -> references a discarded section. -> -> Not sure what should be done here, but certainly the compiler -> isn't at fault here, it is a binutils problem. -> One fix could be to create empty .gnu.linkonce.ia64unw.* section -> in assembler, another special case ia64 unwind sections in the linker. - -Here is a patch for the first possibility. -It certainly makes libstdc++.so to link and even the unwind info looks -good on brief skimming. - -2004-08-17 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> - - * config/tc-ia64.c (start_unwind_section): Add linkonce_empty - argument, don't do anything if current section is not - .gnu.linkonce.t.* and linkonce_empty is set. - (generate_unwind_image, dot_endp): Adjust callers, call - start_unwind_section (*, 1) if nothing will be put into the - section. - ---- binutils/gas/config/tc-ia64.c.jj 2004-07-30 11:42:24.000000000 +0200 -+++ binutils/gas/config/tc-ia64.c 2004-08-17 13:45:04.288173205 +0200 -@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ - /* tc-ia64.c -- Assembler for the HP/Intel IA-64 architecture. -- Copyright 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc. -+ Copyright 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 -+ Free Software Foundation, Inc. - Contributed by David Mosberger-Tang <davidm@hpl.hp.com> - - This file is part of GAS, the GNU Assembler. -@@ -3297,7 +3298,7 @@ static char *special_linkonce_name[] = - }; - - static void --start_unwind_section (const segT text_seg, int sec_index) -+start_unwind_section (const segT text_seg, int sec_index, int linkonce_empty) - { - /* - Use a slightly ugly scheme to derive the unwind section names from -@@ -3359,6 +3360,8 @@ start_unwind_section (const segT text_se - prefix = special_linkonce_name [sec_index - SPECIAL_SECTION_UNWIND]; - suffix += sizeof (".gnu.linkonce.t.") - 1; - } -+ else if (linkonce_empty) -+ return; - - prefix_len = strlen (prefix); - suffix_len = strlen (suffix); -@@ -3444,7 +3447,7 @@ generate_unwind_image (const segT text_s - expressionS exp; - bfd_reloc_code_real_type reloc; - -- start_unwind_section (text_seg, SPECIAL_SECTION_UNWIND_INFO); -+ start_unwind_section (text_seg, SPECIAL_SECTION_UNWIND_INFO, 0); - - /* Make sure the section has 4 byte alignment for ILP32 and - 8 byte alignment for LP64. */ -@@ -3485,6 +3488,8 @@ generate_unwind_image (const segT text_s - unwind.personality_routine = 0; - } - } -+ else -+ start_unwind_section (text_seg, SPECIAL_SECTION_UNWIND_INFO, 1); - - free_saved_prologue_counts (); - unwind.list = unwind.tail = unwind.current_entry = NULL; -@@ -4164,7 +4169,7 @@ dot_endp (dummy) - subseg_set (md.last_text_seg, 0); - unwind.proc_end = expr_build_dot (); - -- start_unwind_section (saved_seg, SPECIAL_SECTION_UNWIND); -+ start_unwind_section (saved_seg, SPECIAL_SECTION_UNWIND, 0); - - /* Make sure that section has 4 byte alignment for ILP32 and - 8 byte alignment for LP64. */ -@@ -4204,6 +4209,9 @@ dot_endp (dummy) - bytes_per_address); - - } -+ else -+ start_unwind_section (saved_seg, SPECIAL_SECTION_UNWIND, 1); -+ - subseg_set (saved_seg, saved_subseg); - - /* Parse names of main and alternate entry points and set symbol sizes. */ - - - Jakub - diff --git a/patches/binutils/2.15.91.0.2/binutils-dup-sections.patch b/patches/binutils/2.15.91.0.2/binutils-dup-sections.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 4e4934d..0000000 --- a/patches/binutils/2.15.91.0.2/binutils-dup-sections.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,68 +0,0 @@ -See http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2004-08/msg00256.html - -Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 21:13:43 -0400 -From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org> -To: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com -Subject: Re: Handle SEC_LINK_DUPLICATES_SAME_CONTENTS for arm-linux -Message-ID: <20040821011342.GA30319@nevyn.them.org> -Mail-Followup-To: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com -References: <20040818145518.GA9774@nevyn.them.org> <20040819055040.GA11820@lucon.org> <20040819080034.GE21716@bubble.modra.org> <20040820173240.GA17678@nevyn.them.org> <20040821003737.GB16016@bubble.modra.org> -In-Reply-To: <20040821003737 dot GB16016 at bubble dot modra dot org> - -On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 10:07:38AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote: -> On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 01:32:40PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: -> > Thanks. How's this? -> -> As you might have guessed from my rather slack review of your previous -> patch, I trust you enough to give the OK without proper review. But -> since you asked... :) - -Checked in as so. - --- -Daniel Jacobowitz - -[ rediffed against binutils-2.15.91.0.2, with some elbow grease ] - -2004-08-20 Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org> - - * elflink.c (_bfd_elf_section_already_linked): Handle - SEC_LINK_DUPLICATES_SAME_CONTENTS. ---- binutils-2.15.91.0.2/bfd/elflink.c.old 2004-07-27 21:36:08.000000000 -0700 -+++ binutils-2.15.91.0.2/bfd/elflink.c 2004-08-26 06:38:07.000000000 -0700 -@@ -9359,6 +9359,35 @@ - (_("%s: %s: warning: duplicate section `%s' has different size\n"), - bfd_archive_filename (abfd), name); - break; -+ case SEC_LINK_DUPLICATES_SAME_CONTENTS: -+ if (sec->size != l->sec->size) -+ (*_bfd_error_handler) -+ (_("%B: duplicate section `%A' has different size\n"), -+ bfd_archive_filename (abfd), sec); -+ else if (sec->size != 0) -+ { -+ bfd_byte *sec_contents, *l_sec_contents; -+ -+ if (!bfd_malloc_and_get_section (abfd, sec, &sec_contents)) -+ (*_bfd_error_handler) -+ (_("%B: warning: could not read contents of section `%A'\n"), -+ bfd_archive_filename (abfd), sec); -+ else if (!bfd_malloc_and_get_section (l->sec->owner, l->sec, -+ &l_sec_contents)) -+ (*_bfd_error_handler) -+ (_("%B: warning: could not read contents of section `%A'\n"), -+ bfd_archive_filename(l->sec->owner), l->sec); -+ else if (memcmp (sec_contents, l_sec_contents, sec->size) != 0) -+ (*_bfd_error_handler) -+ (_("%B: warning: duplicate section `%A' has different contents\n"), -+ bfd_archive_filename (abfd), sec); -+ -+ if (sec_contents) -+ free (sec_contents); -+ if (l_sec_contents) -+ free (l_sec_contents); -+ } -+ break; - } - - /* Set the output_section field so that lang_add_section diff --git a/patches/binutils/2.15.91.0.2/binutils-skip-comments.patch b/patches/binutils/2.15.91.0.2/binutils-skip-comments.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 804a17e..0000000 --- a/patches/binutils/2.15.91.0.2/binutils-skip-comments.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,101 +0,0 @@ -Retrieved from http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2004-04/msg00646.html -Fixes -localealias.s:544: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `,' -when building glibc-2.3.2 with gcc-3.4.0 and binutils-2.15.90.0.3 - -Paths adjusted to match crosstool's patcher. - -Message-Id: m3n052qw2g.fsf@whitebox.m5r.de -From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de> -To: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com> -Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at wasabisystems dot com>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com -Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 22:27:19 +0200 -Subject: Re: demand_empty_rest_of_line and ignore_rest_of_line - -Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com> writes: - -> Index: read.c -> =================================================================== -> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gas/read.c,v -> retrieving revision 1.76 -> diff -c -3 -p -r1.76 read.c -> *** read.c 12 Mar 2004 17:48:12 -0000 1.76 -> --- read.c 18 Mar 2004 09:56:05 -0000 -> *************** read_a_source_file (char *name) -> *** 1053,1059 **** -> #endif -> input_line_pointer--; -> /* Report unknown char as ignored. */ -> ! ignore_rest_of_line (); -> } -> -> #ifdef md_after_pass_hook -> --- 1053,1059 ---- -> #endif -> input_line_pointer--; -> /* Report unknown char as ignored. */ -> ! demand_empty_rest_of_line (); -> } -> -> #ifdef md_after_pass_hook - -This means that the unknown character is no longer ignored, despite the -comment. As a side effect a line starting with a line comment character -not followed by APP in NO_APP mode now triggers an error instead of just a -warning, breaking builds of glibc on m68k-linux. Earlier in -read_a_source_file where #APP is handled there is another comment that -claims that unknown comments are ignored, when in fact they aren't (only -the initial line comment character is skipped). - -Note that the presence of #APP will mess up the line counters, but -that appears to be difficult to fix. - -Andreas. - -2004-04-23 Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> - - * read.c (read_a_source_file): Ignore unknown text after line - comment character. Fix misleading comment. - ---- binutils/gas/read.c.~1.78.~ 2004-04-23 08:58:23.000000000 +0200 -+++ binutils/gas/read.c 2004-04-23 21:49:01.000000000 +0200 -@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ - /* read.c - read a source file - - Copyright 1986, 1987, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, -- 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc. -+ 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. - - This file is part of GAS, the GNU Assembler. - -@@ -950,10 +950,14 @@ read_a_source_file (char *name) - unsigned int new_length; - char *tmp_buf = 0; - -- bump_line_counters (); - s = input_line_pointer; - if (strncmp (s, "APP\n", 4)) -- continue; /* We ignore it */ -+ { -+ /* We ignore it */ -+ ignore_rest_of_line (); -+ continue; -+ } -+ bump_line_counters (); - s += 4; - - sb_new (&sbuf); -@@ -1052,7 +1056,7 @@ read_a_source_file (char *name) - continue; - #endif - input_line_pointer--; -- /* Report unknown char as ignored. */ -+ /* Report unknown char as error. */ - demand_empty_rest_of_line (); - } - - --- -Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de -SuSE Linux AG, MaxfeldstraÃe 5, 90409 NÃrnberg, Germany -Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 -"And now for something completely different." |