1 files changed, 0 insertions, 72 deletions
diff --git a/patches/binutils/2.22/999-ppc-textrels.patch b/patches/binutils/2.22/999-ppc-textrels.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index ff0c031..0000000
--- a/patches/binutils/2.22/999-ppc-textrels.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,72 +0,0 @@
-http://bugs.gentoo.org/392645
-http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13470
-
-2011-12-03  Alan Modra  <amodra@gmail.com>
-
-	PR ld/13470
-	* elf32-ppc.c (ppc_elf_copy_indirect_symbol): Revert substantive
-	change in 2011-07-01 commit.  Comment.
-	* elf64-ppc.c (ppc64_elf_copy_indirect_symbol): Likewise.
-
-diff -durN binutils-2.22.orig/bfd/elf32-ppc.c binutils-2.22/bfd/elf32-ppc.c
---- binutils-2.22.orig/bfd/elf32-ppc.c	2011-11-21 10:29:21.000000000 +0100
-+++ binutils-2.22/bfd/elf32-ppc.c	2011-12-14 19:52:43.308784395 +0100
-@@ -2987,10 +2987,6 @@
-   edir->elf.needs_plt |= eind->elf.needs_plt;
-   edir->elf.pointer_equality_needed |= eind->elf.pointer_equality_needed;
- 
--  /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all.  */
--  if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
--    return;
--
-   if (eind->dyn_relocs != NULL)
-     {
-       if (edir->dyn_relocs != NULL)
-@@ -3022,6 +3018,16 @@
-       eind->dyn_relocs = NULL;
-     }
- 
-+  /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all.
-+     You might think dyn_relocs need not be copied over;  After all,
-+     both syms will be dynamic or both non-dynamic so we're just
-+     moving reloc accounting around.  However, ELIMINATE_COPY_RELOCS 
-+     code in ppc_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol needs to check for
-+     dyn_relocs in read-only sections, and it does so on what is the
-+     DIR sym here.  */
-+  if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
-+    return;
-+
-   /* Copy over the GOT refcount entries that we may have already seen to
-      the symbol which just became indirect.  */
-   edir->elf.got.refcount += eind->elf.got.refcount;
-diff -durN binutils-2.22.orig/bfd/elf64-ppc.c binutils-2.22/bfd/elf64-ppc.c
---- binutils-2.22.orig/bfd/elf64-ppc.c	2011-11-21 10:29:24.000000000 +0100
-+++ binutils-2.22/bfd/elf64-ppc.c	2011-12-14 19:52:43.336784395 +0100
-@@ -4435,10 +4435,6 @@
-   edir->elf.ref_regular_nonweak |= eind->elf.ref_regular_nonweak;
-   edir->elf.needs_plt |= eind->elf.needs_plt;
- 
--  /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all.  */
--  if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
--    return;
--
-   /* Copy over any dynamic relocs we may have on the indirect sym.  */
-   if (eind->dyn_relocs != NULL)
-     {
-@@ -4471,6 +4467,16 @@
-       eind->dyn_relocs = NULL;
-     }
- 
-+  /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all.
-+     You might think dyn_relocs need not be copied over;  After all,
-+     both syms will be dynamic or both non-dynamic so we're just
-+     moving reloc accounting around.  However, ELIMINATE_COPY_RELOCS 
-+     code in ppc64_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol needs to check for
-+     dyn_relocs in read-only sections, and it does so on what is the
-+     DIR sym here.  */
-+  if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
-+    return;
-+
-   /* Copy over got entries that we may have already seen to the
-      symbol which just became indirect.  */
-   if (eind->elf.got.glist != NULL)