diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'patches/glibc/2.3.3/glibc-2.3.3-libeh-kludge.patch')
| -rw-r--r-- | patches/glibc/2.3.3/glibc-2.3.3-libeh-kludge.patch | 75 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 75 deletions
diff --git a/patches/glibc/2.3.3/glibc-2.3.3-libeh-kludge.patch b/patches/glibc/2.3.3/glibc-2.3.3-libeh-kludge.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 6ddc020..0000000 --- a/patches/glibc/2.3.3/glibc-2.3.3-libeh-kludge.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,75 +0,0 @@ -wget "http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/get-raw-msg?listname=libc-alpha&date=2003-09&msgid=20030911190500.GE12344%40sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz" -aka http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2003-09/msg00104.html - -This seems to fix the error - gcc-3.4.1-glibc-2.3.3/lib/gcc/powerpc-7400-linux-gnu/3.4.1/../../../../powerpc-7400-linux-gnu/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_eh - make[1]: *** [build/powerpc-7400-linux-gnu/gcc-3.4.1-glibc-2.3.3/build-glibc/libc.so] Error 1 -but I assume it might cause trouble with nptl -FIXME: once we figure out why this patch is wrong, fix it right :-) - -Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 21:05:00 +0200 -From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com> -To: libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com -Subject: Re: Another ugly bootstrapping patch for libgcc_eh -Message-ID: <20030911190500.GE12344@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> -Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com> -References: <20030911194944.GA6104@nevyn.them.org> <20030911180703.GD12344@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <20030911203621.GA31503@nevyn.them.org> -In-Reply-To: <20030911203621 dot GA31503 at nevyn dot them dot org> - -On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 04:36:21PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: -> > Why exactly do you need that? -> > What exact library needs the functions from libgcc_eh.a? -> > There shouldn't be any these days (__register_*/__frame_state_for etc. -> > functions should come from sysdeps/generic on arches which need them, -> > _Unwind_* come from unwind*.c). -> > IMHO both: -> > -> > # Force the backward compatibility EH functions to be linked. -> > LDFLAGS-c.so += -u __register_frame -> > -> > in Makerules and -lgcc_eh in Makeconfig should go. -> -> If you say so. That -lgcc_eh's been in and out quite a number of -> times. I was just assuming that it was necessary. - -I have been testing following patch on hammer. -linuxthreads built just fine and NPTL libraries too, -and in both cases libraries had the same exported symbols as without -the patch (though its .text slightly shrunk because it no longer contained -unneeded libgcc_eh routines (and also libc.so has fewer .plt slots). -Unfortunately, sln in NPTL build doesn't link, as libgcc_eh.a is needed -in this case. -So, IMHO we need my Makerules change and Daniel's patch. - -2003-09-11 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> - - #* Makerules (LDFLAGS-c.so): Remove -u __register_frame. - * Makeconfig (gnulib): Remove -lgcc_eh. - -# Ulrich already applied this. -#--- libc/Makerules.jj 2003-07-23 03:56:16.000000000 -0400 -#+++ libc/Makerules 2003-09-11 16:22:44.000000000 -0400 -#@@ -572,8 +572,6 @@ LDFLAGS-c.so = -nostdlib -nostartfiles -# LDLIBS-c.so += $(gnulib) -# # Give libc.so an entry point and make it directly runnable itself. -# LDFLAGS-c.so += -e __libc_main -#-# Force the backward compatibility EH functions to be linked. -#-LDFLAGS-c.so += -u __register_frame -# # Pre-link the objects of libc_pic.a so that we can locally resolve -# # COMMON symbols before we link against ld.so. This is because ld.so -# # contains some of libc_pic.a already, which will prevent the COMMONs ---- libc/Makeconfig.jj 2003-07-22 08:25:32.000000000 -0400 -+++ libc/Makeconfig 2003-09-11 16:23:08.000000000 -0400 -@@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ link-libc-bounded = $(common-objpfx)libc - link-extra-libs-bounded = $(foreach lib,$(LDLIBS-$(@F:%-bp=%)),$(common-objpfx)$(lib)_b.a) - - ifndef gnulib --gnulib := -lgcc -lgcc_eh -+gnulib := -lgcc - endif - ifeq ($(elf),yes) - +preinit = $(addprefix $(csu-objpfx),crti.o) - - - Jakub - |