summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/patches/linux/2.6.11.3/100-arch_alpha_kernel_srcons.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'patches/linux/2.6.11.3/100-arch_alpha_kernel_srcons.patch')
-rw-r--r--patches/linux/2.6.11.3/100-arch_alpha_kernel_srcons.patch134
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 134 deletions
diff --git a/patches/linux/2.6.11.3/100-arch_alpha_kernel_srcons.patch b/patches/linux/2.6.11.3/100-arch_alpha_kernel_srcons.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index c163a1e..0000000
--- a/patches/linux/2.6.11.3/100-arch_alpha_kernel_srcons.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,134 +0,0 @@
-Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 20:26:02 -0800
-From: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
-To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
-Cc: Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com>, jbglaw@lug-owl.de,
- linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org
-Subject: Re: 2.6.11.3 build problem in arch/alpha/kernel/srcons.c with gcc-4.0
-Message-ID: <20050321042602.GA3795@twiddle.net>
-Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com>,
- jbglaw@lug-owl.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org
-References: <423E238F.3030805@kegel.com> <20050320190352.65cc1396.akpm@osdl.org>
-Mime-Version: 1.0
-Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
-Content-Disposition: inline
-In-Reply-To: <20050320190352.65cc1396.akpm@osdl.org>
-User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
-
-On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 07:03:52PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
-> Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com> wrote:
-> >
-> > Anyone with an alpha care to suggest a fix for this?
-> >
-> > arch/alpha/kernel/srmcons.c: In function 'srmcons_open':
-> > arch/alpha/kernel/srmcons.c:196: warning: 'srmconsp' may be used uninitialized in this function
-> > make[1]: *** [arch/alpha/kernel/srmcons.o] Error 1
-> > make: *** [arch/alpha/kernel] Error 2
-> >
-> > I get this when building the 2.6.11.3 kernel with a recent gcc-4.0 snapshot.
-> >
->
-> It's beyond gcc's ability to figure out that the code is OK. Options would
-> be to disable -Werror, or to artificially initialise that variable.
-
-Fixed thus.
-
-Note that even with a _raw_read_trylock implementation, smp still
-doesn't work. Everything that init spawns dies immediately. I
-havn't had a chance to find out why yet...
-
-[ Note: deleted changes to smp.c, since they didn't apply cleanly
- to 2.6.11.3 (the function had moved, I guess), and they seemed unrelated.]
-
-r~
-
-
-
-You can import this changeset into BK by piping this whole message to:
-'| bk receive [path to repository]' or apply the patch as usual.
-
-===================================================================
-
-
-ChangeSet@1.2289, 2005-03-20 12:29:41-08:00, rth@kanga.twiddle.home
- [ALPHA] Elimitate two warnings from gcc4.
-
-
- smp.c | 43 -------------------------------------------
- srmcons.c | 27 ++++++++++-----------------
- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
-
-
-diff -Nru a/arch/alpha/kernel/srmcons.c b/arch/alpha/kernel/srmcons.c
---- a/arch/alpha/kernel/srmcons.c 2005-03-20 20:23:28 -08:00
-+++ b/arch/alpha/kernel/srmcons.c 2005-03-20 20:23:28 -08:00
-@@ -164,29 +164,22 @@
- unsigned long flags;
- int retval = 0;
-
-- spin_lock_irqsave(&srmconsp_lock, flags);
--
-- do {
-- if (srmconsp != NULL) {
-- *ps = srmconsp;
-- break;
-- }
-+ if (srmconsp == NULL) {
-+ spin_lock_irqsave(&srmconsp_lock, flags);
-
- srmconsp = kmalloc(sizeof(*srmconsp), GFP_KERNEL);
-- if (srmconsp == NULL) {
-+ if (srmconsp == NULL)
- retval = -ENOMEM;
-- break;
-+ else {
-+ srmconsp->tty = NULL;
-+ spin_lock_init(&srmconsp->lock);
-+ init_timer(&srmconsp->timer);
- }
-
-- srmconsp->tty = NULL;
-- spin_lock_init(&srmconsp->lock);
-- init_timer(&srmconsp->timer);
--
-- *ps = srmconsp;
-- } while(0);
--
-- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&srmconsp_lock, flags);
-+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&srmconsp_lock, flags);
-+ }
-
-+ *ps = srmconsp;
- return retval;
- }
-
-
-===================================================================
-
-
-This BitKeeper patch contains the following changesets:
-1.2289
-## Wrapped with gzip_uu ##
-
-
-M'XL( $!,/D( [56[V_;-A#]+/X5!Q38FFV628KZY<!!TJ98BP9;D"&?BL)@
-M),H6+%$:2=DQIOWO)>4XSH8D1KK%-F#@>'J\]^[>V6_@6@LU\919H#?PL=%F
-MXG$E?+,N\[P2OA3&QJ^:QL;'BZ868YLY?O=YS&_;$?4C9$\ON<D6L!)*3SSB
-M!_<1LVG%Q+OZ\.OUQ=D50M,IO%]P.1=_" /3*3*-6O$JUZ?<+*I&^D9QJ6MA
-MN)\U=7^?VE.,J7V') YP&/4DPBSN,Y(3PAD1.:8LB=@>3:P:O]%YY3=J_D^4
-M$ <DH4&0!LRBL"A YT!\2I,4<#C&P9AB('1"TPDC(YQ,, 9+]G1I(?B]($X#
-M^)G""*-W\/]2>(\R^')V<?GQ["M\J,JZ--P(,.L&UES)4LXU%*JI89YES$>?
-M@82,8'2Y5Q6-7OA""'.,3AZA:?O><Y4MQKQJ%WR\%$J*:JQ5G352^YEC%&!"
-ML664!%%/+:^PCW-:I 7)XUSDE*;Q$_(= K9]<FK1E(0]HPPS6^'S2C\"6+=;
-ML#O=&::T#^*8QGU*;D@>)3BWJA?I3?Z"*G>@#RND49R&PW0_0\O-^RN)C,R\
-MNCVM2MD9U<CRUL_%EYU:7P]+32@A$644]RQ,*!TL0>B_#4'" X8@&$8D?A5+
-M7(FU*JT1[@J?S869M:I<67/,M%%=9D!W;MTLN(&?6@VE!EZM^4:#>] (Z<RR
-M':3?8:36P\<._^5S'?L.+YV3*(88?;*4@"*O+.#M'5QK^P^_75]<',%?R/-T
-M6\I9U63+6:G^U'PEWOZP2QS"OT!1\;D^.K:0<03$0;HO[W%,EY5LLQ)@-DM4
-M6@P7>;O<T8DQ&]CF'P\'^Q)D:?;WCTY<\&C(<2<S4]9"/3P? D-I"8'$7IHD
-MCNT6L9,[6DIH.PI/,_/^=H^FCI7KV737WO;X*2\Y\QW^W?A/JP#==')YJDVG
-M+=HA'SU8!H1AS!@-^X"F=LJ<AT+R8@]9"['@52QT+BKA'%2W,]-):YML(?+.
-M[HSY,90&\D9H^:,!GIF.5]4&6J&*1M7 Y08Z+8JNLB!%)S-3-M)%:]M:YZKM
-I\COL*J?5=SG*3;1=2J%3<?]?PY:?+7573PFE(L5)@+X!A'U=W,@(
-
-
-