Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Build and install GMP and MPFR for the target.
Use the target GMP and MPFR to build the native gdb.
Have separate extra_config for cross gdb, native gdb and gdbserver.
Check native GMP and MPFR in //.
/trunk/scripts/build/debug/300-gdb.sh | 27 19 8 0 ++++++++++++++++-------
/trunk/scripts/build/gmp.sh | 47 39 8 0 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
/trunk/scripts/build/mpfr.sh | 49 40 9 0 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
/trunk/steps.mk | 2 2 0 0 ++
/trunk/config/cc/gcc.in | 18 1 17 0 +--------------
/trunk/config/debug/gdb.in | 6 1 5 0 +----
/trunk/config/config.in | 1 1 0 0 +
/trunk/config/gmp_mpfr.in | 34 34 0 0 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
8 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
|
|
/trunk/docs/overview.txt | 2 1 1 0 +-
/trunk/steps.mk | 7 5 2 0 +++++--
/trunk/samples/samples.mk | 8 5 3 0 +++++---
/trunk/ct-ng.in | 5 3 2 0 +++--
4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
|
|
Fortran is not supported for all targets, though. ARM at least does not work.
/trunk/scripts/build/binutils.sh | 8 8 0 0 ++++++++
/trunk/scripts/build/cc_gcc.sh | 11 6 5 0 ++++++-----
/trunk/scripts/crosstool.sh | 10 9 1 0 +++++++++-
/trunk/tools/addToolVersion.sh | 3 3 0 0 +++
/trunk/steps.mk | 2 2 0 0 ++
/trunk/config/cc/gcc.in | 16 16 0 0 ++++++++++++++++
6 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
|
|
Move build binutils' target libraries after final gcc.
Have a unique list of steps, it's easier to maintain.
/trunk/scripts/build/binutils.sh | 8 5 3 0 +++++---
/trunk/scripts/crosstool.sh | 16 2 14 0 ++--------------
/trunk/steps.mk | 29 16 13 0 ++++++++++++++++-------------
3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
|
|
|
|
Rationale:
Most of the time, soft-float problems are caused by this sucker of gcc:
it has support for soft float for all of the targets I've tried so far,
but does not activate this code until you dwelve into half a dozen of
files to make it accept to build and link the support code...
So, yes: gcc has soft-float support. And again, yes: gcc is a sucker.
|
|
|
|
|