From e377769fb19a01b03e0205960b74f4b2b87793b1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Yann E. MORIN\"" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:56:58 +0000
Subject: Catching a double fault is doomed... Don't take action. Simplify
 CT_DoExecLog: it does not support affectations prior to the command, anyway.

 /trunk/scripts/functions |    5     1     4     0 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/functions b/scripts/functions
index bfacf94..e44c29b 100644
--- a/scripts/functions
+++ b/scripts/functions
@@ -3,11 +3,8 @@
 # Licensed under the GPL v2. See COPYING in the root of this package
 
 # Prepare the fault handler
-CT_IN_FAULT_HANDLER=0
 CT_OnError() {
     ret=$?
-    [ ${CT_IN_FAULT_HANDLER} -ne 0 ] && return 0
-    CT_IN_FAULT_HANDLER=1
     CT_DoLog ERROR "Build failed in step '${CT_STEP_MESSAGE[${CT_STEP_COUNT}]}'"
     for((step=(CT_STEP_COUNT-1); step>1; step--)); do
         CT_DoLog ERROR "      called in step '${CT_STEP_MESSAGE[${step}]}'"
@@ -114,7 +111,7 @@ CT_DoExecLog() {
     local level="$1"
     shift
     CT_DoLog DEBUG "==> Executing: '${@}'"
-    eval "${@}" 2>&1 |CT_DoLog "${level}"
+    "${@}" 2>&1 |CT_DoLog "${level}"
 }
 
 # Tail message to be logged whatever happens
-- 
cgit v0.10.2-6-g49f6