patches/gcc/3.4.6/180-pr15068-fix.patch
author "Benoît Thébaudeau" <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
Mon Apr 16 15:25:36 2012 +0200 (2012-04-16)
changeset 2941 13e40098fffc
parent 339 bd5e0a849352
permissions -rw-r--r--
cc/gcc: update Linaro GCC revisions to 2012.04

Update Linaro GCC with the latest available revisions.

The 4.7 revision is also released, but the infrastructure is not yet ready for
it in CT-NG.

Signed-off-by: "Benoît Thébaudeau" <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
yann@339
     1
diff -durN gcc-3.4.6.orig/gcc/flow.c gcc-3.4.6/gcc/flow.c
yann@339
     2
--- gcc-3.4.6.orig/gcc/flow.c	2005-09-01 22:51:09.000000000 +0200
yann@339
     3
+++ gcc-3.4.6/gcc/flow.c	2007-08-15 23:00:30.000000000 +0200
yann@339
     4
@@ -1884,6 +1884,7 @@
yann@339
     5
 	  rtx set_src = SET_SRC (pc_set (BB_END (bb)));
yann@339
     6
 	  rtx cond_true = XEXP (set_src, 0);
yann@339
     7
 	  rtx reg = XEXP (cond_true, 0);
yann@339
     8
+ 	  enum rtx_code inv_cond;
yann@339
     9
 
yann@339
    10
 	  if (GET_CODE (reg) == SUBREG)
yann@339
    11
 	    reg = SUBREG_REG (reg);
yann@339
    12
@@ -1892,11 +1893,13 @@
yann@339
    13
 	     in the form of a comparison of a register against zero.  
yann@339
    14
 	     If the condition is more complex than that, then it is safe
yann@339
    15
 	     not to record any information.  */
yann@339
    16
-	  if (GET_CODE (reg) == REG
yann@339
    17
+ 	  inv_cond = reversed_comparison_code (cond_true, BB_END (bb));
yann@339
    18
+ 	  if (inv_cond != UNKNOWN
yann@339
    19
+	      && GET_CODE (reg) == REG
yann@339
    20
 	      && XEXP (cond_true, 1) == const0_rtx)
yann@339
    21
 	    {
yann@339
    22
 	      rtx cond_false
yann@339
    23
-		= gen_rtx_fmt_ee (reverse_condition (GET_CODE (cond_true)),
yann@339
    24
+		= gen_rtx_fmt_ee (inv_cond,
yann@339
    25
 				  GET_MODE (cond_true), XEXP (cond_true, 0),
yann@339
    26
 				  XEXP (cond_true, 1));
yann@339
    27
 	      if (GET_CODE (XEXP (set_src, 1)) == PC)