# Linux kernel options

## select KERNEL_SUPPORTS_SHARED_LIBS

##

## help Build a toolchain targeting systems running Linux as a kernel.

config KERNEL_LINUX_USE_CUSTOM_HEADERS

    bool

    prompt "Use pre-installed headers tree (OBSOLETE)"

    depends on OBSOLETE

    help

      If you have some pre-installed kernel headers lying around, you can

      enter the path to these headers, below, they will be copied from

      there, and into the toolchain's sysroot.

      Note:

      This will *not* let you use a complete kernel tree!

      If you want to use your own full kernel tree, then you want to say 'N'

      here, and select KERNEL_LINUX_CUSTOM, in the versions list, below.

config KERNEL_LINUX_INSTALL

    bool

    default y if ! KERNEL_LINUX_USE_CUSTOM_HEADERS

if KERNEL_LINUX_INSTALL

choice

    bool

    prompt "Linux kernel version"

# Don't remove next line

# CT_INSERT_VERSION_BELOW

config KERNEL_V_3_0_1

    bool

    prompt "3.0.1"

config KERNEL_V_3_0

    bool

    prompt "3.0"

config KERNEL_V_2_6_39_4

    bool

    prompt "2.6.39.4"

config KERNEL_V_2_6_38_8

    bool

    prompt "2.6.38.8"

config KERNEL_V_2_6_37_6

    bool

    prompt "2.6.37.6"

config KERNEL_V_2_6_36_4

    bool

    prompt "2.6.36.4"

config KERNEL_V_2_6_35_14

    bool

    prompt "2.6.35.14 (longterm)"

    help

      The Linux 2.6.35 tree is a "longterm" maintenance branch.

      It is intended to fill the niche for users who are not using distribution

      kernels but want to use a regression-free kernel for a longer time.

      Critical bug fixes to later 2.6 releases are often ported to this branch

      which makes 2.6.35 a very useful base for many embedded developers seeking

      stable APIs or those who do not need the latest bleeding edge features.

      ... and no, this kernel has not undergone any specific QA testing.

      See the original announcement by Andi Kleen in the following mailing

      list entry:

        http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129136895415202&w=4

config KERNEL_V_2_6_34_10

    bool

    prompt "2.6.34.10"

config KERNEL_V_2_6_33_17

    bool

    prompt "2.6.33.17"

    help

      This is primarily for the use of those people who are stuck using the

      .33-rt kernel.  Anyone else who really wants to use the .33 kernel tree

      is welcome to use this one as well.

config KERNEL_V_2_6_32_44

    bool

    prompt "2.6.32.44 (longterm)"

    help

      The Linux 2.6.32 tree is a "longterm" maintenance branch.

      It is intended to fill the niche for users who are not using distribution

      kernels but want to use a regression-free kernel for a longer time.

      Critical bug fixes to later 2.6 releases are often ported to this branch

      which makes 2.6.32 a very useful base for many embedded developers seeking

      stable APIs or those who do not need the latest bleeding edge features.

      ... and no, this kernel has not undergone any specific QA testing.

      See the original announcement by Greg Kroah-Hartman in the following

      mailing list entry:

        http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126384198403392&w=4

config KERNEL_V_2_6_31_14

    bool

    prompt "2.6.31.14"

config KERNEL_V_2_6_27_59

    bool

    prompt "2.6.27.59 (longterm)"

    help

      The Linux 2.6.27 tree is a "longterm" maintenance branch.

      It is intended to fill the niche for users who are not using distribution

      kernels but want to use a regression-free kernel for a longer time.

      Critical bug fixes to later 2.6 releases are often ported to this branch

      which makes 2.6.27 a very useful base for many embedded developers seeking

      stable APIs or those who do not need the latest bleeding edge features.

      ... and no, this kernel has not undergone any specific QA testing.

      See the original announcement by Adrian Bunk in the following mailing list

      entry:

        http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122375909403298&w=4

      It is now maintained by Greg Kroah-Hartman, see this mailing list entry:

        http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129133701916793&w=4

config KERNEL_LINUX_CUSTOM

    bool

    prompt "custom tarball"

    help

      Use a local tarball of a complete kernel source tree.

config KERNEL_LINUX_CUSTOM_TARBALL

    string

    prompt "Path to custom tarball"

    depends on KERNEL_LINUX_CUSTOM

    help

      Enter here the path to the tarball of your full kernel tree.

endchoice

config KERNEL_VERSION

    string

# Don't remove next line

# CT_INSERT_VERSION_STRING_BELOW

    default "3.0.1" if KERNEL_V_3_0_1

    default "3.0" if KERNEL_V_3_0

    default "2.6.39.4" if KERNEL_V_2_6_39_4

    default "2.6.38.8" if KERNEL_V_2_6_38_8

    default "2.6.37.6" if KERNEL_V_2_6_37_6

    default "2.6.36.4" if KERNEL_V_2_6_36_4

    default "2.6.35.14" if KERNEL_V_2_6_35_14

    default "2.6.34.10" if KERNEL_V_2_6_34_10

    default "2.6.33.17" if KERNEL_V_2_6_33_17

    default "2.6.32.44" if KERNEL_V_2_6_32_44

    default "2.6.31.14" if KERNEL_V_2_6_31_14

    default "2.6.27.59" if KERNEL_V_2_6_27_59

endif # KERNEL_LINUX_INSTALL

if KERNEL_LINUX_USE_CUSTOM_HEADERS

config KERNEL_LINUX_CUSTOM_PATH

    string

    prompt "Path to custom headers directory/tarball"

    help

      See KERNEL_LINUX_CUSTOM_IS_TARBALL, below.

config KERNEL_LINUX_CUSTOM_IS_TARBALL

    bool

    prompt "This is a tarball"

    help

      If you say 'n' here, the path above is expected to point to a directory

      containing readily prepared headers

      If you say 'y' here, then the path above is expected to point to a

      tarball of such a directory.

      Eg., if your headers are available in: /foo/bar/buz/my_hdrs/include,

      say 'n' here, and enter: /foo/bar/buz/my_hdrs below.

      Now, passing a tarball around is easier than passing a directory, so

      if you want to, you can make a tarball of /foo/bar/buz/my_hdrs/include,

      say 'y' here, and enter the path to this tarball below.

endif # KERNEL_LINUX_USE_CUSTOM_HEADERS