docs/6 - Toolchain types.txt
author "Benoît THÉBAUDEAU" <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
Thu Jul 28 22:09:31 2011 +0200 (2011-07-28)
changeset 2573 424fa2092ace
parent 2563 e17f35b05539
child 2908 dcdb309b7967
permissions -rw-r--r--
scripts/libc: do not build add-ons by default

Currently, no --enable-add-ons option is passed to libc configure when
"$(do_libc_add_ons_list ,)" is empty, which makes configure automatically search
for present add-ons. In that case, all present add-ons are built, although
no add-on was selected by the user in the config. Moreover, this can make the
configure fail if some non-standard add-ons like eglibc-localedef are present.

This behavior also leads to an inconsistency from a user point of view between
the following cases:
- LIBC_ADDONS_LIST="", LIBC_GLIBC_USE_PORTS=n and THREADS="none" in the config,
which makes "$(do_libc_add_ons_list ,)" return "", so all present add-ons
are built.
- LIBC_ADDONS_LIST="", LIBC_GLIBC_USE_PORTS=n and THREADS!="none" in the
config, which makes "$(do_libc_add_ons_list ,)" return the add-on supporting
the chosen threading implementation, e.g. "nptl", so only this add-on is
built.

This patch disables the building of all add-ons in that case.

It is still possible to build all present add-ons by adding --enable-add-ons to
LIBC_GLIBC_EXTRA_CONFIG_ARRAY.

Signed-off-by: "Benoît THÉBAUDEAU" <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
yann@2076
     1
File.........: 6 - Toolchain types.txt
antony@2563
     2
Copyright....: (C) 2010 Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
yann@2076
     3
License......: Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike (CC-by-sa), v2.5
yann@2076
     4
yann@2076
     5
yann@2076
     6
Toolchain types  /
yann@2076
     7
________________/
yann@2076
     8
yann@2076
     9
yann@2076
    10
There are four kinds of toolchains you could encounter.
yann@2076
    11
yann@2076
    12
First off, you must understand the following: when it comes to compilers there
yann@2076
    13
are up to four machines involved:
yann@2076
    14
  1) the machine configuring the toolchain components: the config machine
yann@2076
    15
  2) the machine building the toolchain components:    the build machine
yann@2076
    16
  3) the machine running the toolchain:                the host machine
yann@2076
    17
  4) the machine the toolchain is generating code for: the target machine
yann@2076
    18
yann@2076
    19
We can most of the time assume that the config machine and the build machine
yann@2076
    20
are the same. Most of the time, this will be true. The only time it isn't
yann@2076
    21
is if you're using distributed compilation (such as distcc). Let's forget
yann@2076
    22
this for the sake of simplicity.
yann@2076
    23
yann@2076
    24
So we're left with three machines:
yann@2076
    25
 - build
yann@2076
    26
 - host
yann@2076
    27
 - target
yann@2076
    28
yann@2076
    29
Any toolchain will involve those three machines. You can be as pretty sure of
yann@2076
    30
this as "2 and 2 are 4". Here is how they come into play:
yann@2076
    31
yann@2076
    32
1) build == host == target
antony@2564
    33
    This is a plain native toolchain, targeting the exact same machine as the
yann@2076
    34
    one it is built on, and running again on this exact same machine. You have
yann@2076
    35
    to build such a toolchain when you want to use an updated component, such
yann@2076
    36
    as a newer gcc for example.
yann@2076
    37
    crosstool-NG calls it "native".
yann@2076
    38
yann@2076
    39
2) build == host != target
yann@2076
    40
    This is a classic cross-toolchain, which is expected to be run on the same
yann@2076
    41
    machine it is compiled on, and generate code to run on a second machine,
yann@2076
    42
    the target.
yann@2076
    43
    crosstool-NG calls it "cross".
yann@2076
    44
yann@2076
    45
3) build != host == target
yann@2076
    46
    Such a toolchain is also a native toolchain, as it targets the same machine
yann@2076
    47
    as it runs on. But it is build on another machine. You want such a
yann@2076
    48
    toolchain when porting to a new architecture, or if the build machine is
yann@2076
    49
    much faster than the host machine.
yann@2076
    50
    crosstool-NG calls it "cross-native".
yann@2076
    51
yann@2076
    52
4) build != host != target
yann@2076
    53
    This one is called a canadian-toolchain (*), and is tricky. The three
yann@2076
    54
    machines in play are different. You might want such a toolchain if you
yann@2076
    55
    have a fast build machine, but the users will use it on another machine,
yann@2076
    56
    and will produce code to run on a third machine.
yann@2076
    57
    crosstool-NG calls it "canadian".
yann@2076
    58
yann@2076
    59
crosstool-NG can build all these kinds of toolchains (or is aiming at it,
yann@2076
    60
anyway!)
yann@2076
    61
yann@2076
    62
(*) The term Canadian Cross came about because at the time that these issues
yann@2076
    63
    were all being hashed out, Canada had three national political parties.
yann@2076
    64
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross_compiler