patches/binutils/2.17a/140-better_file_error.patch
author Yann Diorcet <diorcet.yann@gmail.com>
Mon Nov 19 21:45:09 2012 +0100 (2012-11-19)
changeset 3121 5016315d88ba
parent 747 d3e603e7c17c
permissions -rw-r--r--
binutils/binutils: simplify gold dependencies

In preparation of adding a new kernel-type, Yann D. came up
with a change in semantic on binutils/gold availability.

So far, it was architectures' responsibility to declare that
they did support binutils/gold or not. It makes much more sense
that binutils/gold declares its own availability depending on
the current architecture; after all, architectures have no way
to know wether gold supports them, while gold does know it.

Signed-off-by:Yann Diorcet <diorcet.yann@gmail.com>
[yann.morin.1998@free.fr: split up original patch for self-contained changes]
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Message-Id: <d3d1d51f399e6d2c1163.1353320546@macbook-smorlat.local>
Patchwork-Id: 199971
yann@55
     1
diff -dur binutils-2.17.old/bfd/opncls.c binutils-2.17/bfd/opncls.c
yann@55
     2
--- binutils-2.17.old/bfd/opncls.c	2006-03-16 13:20:16.000000000 +0100
yann@55
     3
+++ binutils-2.17/bfd/opncls.c	2007-05-01 18:26:11.000000000 +0200
yann@55
     4
@@ -158,6 +158,13 @@
yann@55
     5
 {
yann@55
     6
   bfd *nbfd;
yann@55
     7
   const bfd_target *target_vec;
yann@55
     8
+  struct stat s;
yann@55
     9
+
yann@55
    10
+  if (stat (filename, &s) == 0)
yann@55
    11
+    if (S_ISDIR(s.st_mode)) {
yann@55
    12
+      bfd_set_error (bfd_error_file_not_recognized);
yann@55
    13
+      return NULL;
yann@55
    14
+    }
yann@55
    15
 
yann@55
    16
   nbfd = _bfd_new_bfd ();
yann@55
    17
   if (nbfd == NULL)