binutils/binutils: simplify gold dependencies

In preparation of adding a new kernel-type, Yann D. came up
with a change in semantic on binutils/gold availability.

So far, it was architectures' responsibility to declare that
they did support binutils/gold or not. It makes much more sense
that binutils/gold declares its own availability depending on
the current architecture; after all, architectures have no way
to know wether gold supports them, while gold does know it.

Signed-off-by:Yann Diorcet <diorcet.yann@gmail.com>
[yann.morin.1998@free.fr: split up original patch for self-contained changes]
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Message-Id: <d3d1d51f399e6d2c1163.1353320546@macbook-smorlat.local>
Patchwork-Id: 199971

diff -durN gcc-4.4.0.orig/libgomp/configure gcc-4.4.0/libgomp/configure

--- gcc-4.4.0.orig/libgomp/configure	2009-04-21 11:08:08.000000000 +0200

+++ gcc-4.4.0/libgomp/configure	2009-05-27 21:38:19.000000000 +0200

@@ -3334,7 +3334,7 @@

 # Add -Wall -Werror if we are using GCC.

 if test "x$GCC" = "xyes"; then

-  XCFLAGS="$XCFLAGS -Wall -Werror"

+  XCFLAGS="$XCFLAGS -Wall"

 fi

 # Find other programs we need.