patches/gcc/4.2.2/270-soft-float.patch
author "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Fri Jan 01 19:03:48 2010 +0100 (2010-01-01)
changeset 1676 6f836ab1b317
parent 616 6e78f7085707
permissions -rw-r--r--
cc/gcc: update ptachsets for gcc-4.4.{0,1,2}

As reported by Joachim Nilsson <jocke@vmlinux.org>
in: http://sourceware.org/ml/crossgcc/2010-01/msg00005.html

It seems I need to add the 4.3.4/290-index_macro.patch to the GCC 4.4.x
series as well. I immediately trigger the following libstdc++ bug for
4.4.2 with a uClibc .config which has UCLIBC_SUSV3_LEGACY_MACROS set[1].

http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/uclibc/2006-April/035991.html
yann@616
     1
diff -uNpr gcc-4.2.1_orig/gcc/config/rs6000/darwin-ldouble.c gcc-4.2.1/gcc/config/rs6000/darwin-ldouble.c
yann@616
     2
--- gcc-4.2.1_orig/gcc/config/rs6000/darwin-ldouble.c	2007-03-05 11:54:00.000000000 -0500
yann@616
     3
+++ gcc-4.2.1/gcc/config/rs6000/darwin-ldouble.c	2008-01-31 17:51:24.000000000 -0500
yann@616
     4
@@ -70,6 +70,8 @@ Software Foundation, 51 Franklin Street,
yann@616
     5
    but GCC currently generates poor code when a union is used to turn
yann@616
     6
    a long double into a pair of doubles.  */
yann@616
     7
 
yann@616
     8
+#if defined (_SOFT_FLOAT) && defined (__LONG_DOUBLE_128__)
yann@616
     9
+
yann@616
    10
 long double __gcc_qadd (double, double, double, double);
yann@616
    11
 long double __gcc_qsub (double, double, double, double);
yann@616
    12
 long double __gcc_qmul (double, double, double, double);
yann@616
    13
@@ -219,8 +221,6 @@ __gcc_qdiv (double a, double b, double c
yann@616
    14
   return z.ldval;
yann@616
    15
 }
yann@616
    16
 
yann@616
    17
-#if defined (_SOFT_FLOAT) && defined (__LONG_DOUBLE_128__)
yann@616
    18
-
yann@616
    19
 long double __gcc_qneg (double, double);
yann@616
    20
 int __gcc_qeq (double, double, double, double);
yann@616
    21
 int __gcc_qne (double, double, double, double);