patches/strace/4.5.19/140-undef-CTL_PROC.patch
| author |
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr> |
|
Tue May 08 18:31:10 2012 +0200 (2012-05-08) |
| changeset 2964 |
d48c03998dc1 |
| permissions |
-rw-r--r-- |
scripts: fix catching failures
POSIX 1003.1-2008 does not say whether "set -e" should catch a sub-shell
that exits with !0 (it has a list of conditions to catch, but no list of
conditions not to catch, and this situation is not listed).
bash-3 does not catch such a failure, but bash-4 does. That why, on my
Squeeze system I did not see the issue, while Thomas did on is Lenny chroot.
Reported-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
|
yann@1613
|
1 |
diff -durN strace-4.5.19.orig/system.c strace-4.5.19/system.c
|
|
yann@1613
|
2 |
--- strace-4.5.19.orig/system.c 2009-06-01 11:59:11.000000000 +0200
|
|
yann@1613
|
3 |
+++ strace-4.5.19/system.c 2009-10-28 18:47:18.000000000 +0100
|
|
yann@1613
|
4 |
@@ -1654,7 +1654,9 @@
|
|
yann@1613
|
5 |
{ CTL_KERN, "CTL_KERN" },
|
|
yann@1613
|
6 |
{ CTL_VM, "CTL_VM" },
|
|
yann@1613
|
7 |
{ CTL_NET, "CTL_NET" },
|
|
yann@1613
|
8 |
+#ifdef CTL_PROC
|
|
yann@1613
|
9 |
{ CTL_PROC, "CTL_PROC" },
|
|
yann@1613
|
10 |
+#endif
|
|
yann@1613
|
11 |
{ CTL_FS, "CTL_FS" },
|
|
yann@1613
|
12 |
{ CTL_DEBUG, "CTL_DEBUG" },
|
|
yann@1613
|
13 |
{ CTL_DEV, "CTL_DEV" },
|