1.1 --- a/patches/gcc/3.3/sh-spec.patch Tue Aug 14 19:32:22 2007 +0000
1.2 +++ /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
1.3 @@ -1,45 +0,0 @@
1.4 -Message-Id: <200308020452.h724q0n01509@r-rr.iij4u.or.jp>
1.5 -To: dank@kegel.com
1.6 -Cc: kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp
1.7 -Subject: Re: Writing PIC version of __udivsi3_i4?
1.8 -In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 01 Aug 2003 21:15:27 -0700"
1.9 - <3F2B3ADF.6030206@kegel.com>
1.10 -References: <3F2B3ADF.6030206@kegel.com>
1.11 -Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2003 13:58:05 +0900
1.12 -From: kaz Kojima <kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp>
1.13 -
1.14 -Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com> wrote:
1.15 -> It seems it might be from gcc's spec file:
1.16 ->
1.17 -> *subtarget_link_spec:
1.18 -> %{shared:-shared} %{!static: %{rdynamic:-export-dynamic} %{!dynamic-linker:-dynamic-linker /lib/ld-linux.so.2} %{!rpath:-rpath /lib}} %{static:-static}
1.19 ->
1.20 -> as the only place -rpath showed up was in the output of gcc -v as it
1.21 -> was linking libc.so.
1.22 ->
1.23 -> Well, that's a clue, anyway! Guess I'll dig through the spec files
1.24 -> tomorrow to see if I can figure it out some more.
1.25 -
1.26 -I've grepped gcc/config/*/*.h and found only SH and old libc1 stuffs
1.27 -of i386/alpha include %{!rpath:-rpath ... in 3.3 release and the
1.28 -current CVS. And my sh-gcc's specs doesn't have this :-(
1.29 -It would be the Right Thing to remove this stuff simply. How about
1.30 -the gcc patch below?
1.31 -
1.32 -Regards,
1.33 - kaz
1.34 ---
1.35 ---- gcc-3.3/gcc/config/sh/linux.h.orig Sat Aug 2 13:20:57 2003
1.36 -+++ gcc-3.3/gcc/config/sh/linux.h Sat Aug 2 13:22:42 2003
1.37 -@@ -48,8 +48,7 @@ do { \
1.38 - "%{shared:-shared} \
1.39 - %{!static: \
1.40 - %{rdynamic:-export-dynamic} \
1.41 -- %{!dynamic-linker:-dynamic-linker /lib/ld-linux.so.2} \
1.42 -- %{!rpath:-rpath /lib}} \
1.43 -+ %{!dynamic-linker:-dynamic-linker /lib/ld-linux.so.2}} \
1.44 - %{static:-static}"
1.45 -
1.46 - /* The GNU C++ standard library requires that these macros be defined. */
1.47 -
1.48 -