1.1 --- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
     1.2 +++ b/patches/gcc/3.3.3/pr10412-1-test.patch	Sat Feb 24 11:00:05 2007 +0000
     1.3 @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
     1.4 +--- /dev/null	Sat Dec 14 13:56:51 2002
     1.5 ++++ gcc-3.3.1/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr10412-1.c	Sun Sep 14 16:15:21 2003
     1.6 +@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
     1.7 ++/* PR target/10412
     1.8 ++ * Reporter: shrinivasa@kpitcummins.com 
     1.9 ++ * Summary: Renesas SH - Incorrect code generation
    1.10 ++ * Description:
    1.11 ++ * When following code is compiled  with
    1.12 ++ * sh-elf-gcc  -S -mhitachi -m2 -O2 bug1.c
    1.13 ++ * generates an incorrect code.
    1.14 ++ *
    1.15 ++ * Testcase tweaked by dank@kegel.com
    1.16 ++ * Problem only happens with -mhitachi -m2.  Not sure if I can give those
    1.17 ++ * options for all sh targets.  They work on sh4, though.
    1.18 ++ * Not marked as xfail as it's a regression relative to hardhat 2.0 gcc-2.97.
    1.19 ++*/
    1.20 ++/* { dg-do run } */
    1.21 ++/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
    1.22 ++int global_val;
    1.23 ++
    1.24 ++int func0(int x)
    1.25 ++{
    1.26 ++	global_val += x;
    1.27 ++	return (x != 99);
    1.28 ++}
    1.29 ++
    1.30 ++int func1(unsigned long addr)
    1.31 ++{
    1.32 ++	int err;
    1.33 ++
    1.34 ++	err = func0(addr);
    1.35 ++	if (err)
    1.36 ++		return (err);
    1.37 ++
    1.38 ++	err = func0(addr * 7);	/* address of func0 is lost during multiplication -> probable SIGSEGV */
    1.39 ++	return (err);
    1.40 ++}
    1.41 ++
    1.42 ++int main(int argc, char **argv)
    1.43 ++{
    1.44 ++	global_val = 0;
    1.45 ++	global_val += func1(99);
    1.46 ++	if (global_val != 99 * 8 + 1)
    1.47 ++		abort();
    1.48 ++	return 0;
    1.49 ++}