1.1 --- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
1.2 +++ b/patches/glibc/2.3.3/glibc-2.3.3-libeh-kludge.patch Sat Feb 24 11:00:05 2007 +0000
1.3 @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
1.4 +wget "http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/get-raw-msg?listname=libc-alpha&date=2003-09&msgid=20030911190500.GE12344%40sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz"
1.5 +aka http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2003-09/msg00104.html
1.6 +
1.7 +This seems to fix the error
1.8 + gcc-3.4.1-glibc-2.3.3/lib/gcc/powerpc-7400-linux-gnu/3.4.1/../../../../powerpc-7400-linux-gnu/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_eh
1.9 + make[1]: *** [build/powerpc-7400-linux-gnu/gcc-3.4.1-glibc-2.3.3/build-glibc/libc.so] Error 1
1.10 +but I assume it might cause trouble with nptl
1.11 +FIXME: once we figure out why this patch is wrong, fix it right :-)
1.12 +
1.13 +Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 21:05:00 +0200
1.14 +From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
1.15 +To: libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
1.16 +Subject: Re: Another ugly bootstrapping patch for libgcc_eh
1.17 +Message-ID: <20030911190500.GE12344@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>
1.18 +Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
1.19 +References: <20030911194944.GA6104@nevyn.them.org> <20030911180703.GD12344@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <20030911203621.GA31503@nevyn.them.org>
1.20 +In-Reply-To: <20030911203621 dot GA31503 at nevyn dot them dot org>
1.21 +
1.22 +On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 04:36:21PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
1.23 +> > Why exactly do you need that?
1.24 +> > What exact library needs the functions from libgcc_eh.a?
1.25 +> > There shouldn't be any these days (__register_*/__frame_state_for etc.
1.26 +> > functions should come from sysdeps/generic on arches which need them,
1.27 +> > _Unwind_* come from unwind*.c).
1.28 +> > IMHO both:
1.29 +> >
1.30 +> > # Force the backward compatibility EH functions to be linked.
1.31 +> > LDFLAGS-c.so += -u __register_frame
1.32 +> >
1.33 +> > in Makerules and -lgcc_eh in Makeconfig should go.
1.34 +>
1.35 +> If you say so. That -lgcc_eh's been in and out quite a number of
1.36 +> times. I was just assuming that it was necessary.
1.37 +
1.38 +I have been testing following patch on hammer.
1.39 +linuxthreads built just fine and NPTL libraries too,
1.40 +and in both cases libraries had the same exported symbols as without
1.41 +the patch (though its .text slightly shrunk because it no longer contained
1.42 +unneeded libgcc_eh routines (and also libc.so has fewer .plt slots).
1.43 +Unfortunately, sln in NPTL build doesn't link, as libgcc_eh.a is needed
1.44 +in this case.
1.45 +So, IMHO we need my Makerules change and Daniel's patch.
1.46 +
1.47 +2003-09-11 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
1.48 +
1.49 + #* Makerules (LDFLAGS-c.so): Remove -u __register_frame.
1.50 + * Makeconfig (gnulib): Remove -lgcc_eh.
1.51 +
1.52 +# Ulrich already applied this.
1.53 +#--- libc/Makerules.jj 2003-07-23 03:56:16.000000000 -0400
1.54 +#+++ libc/Makerules 2003-09-11 16:22:44.000000000 -0400
1.55 +#@@ -572,8 +572,6 @@ LDFLAGS-c.so = -nostdlib -nostartfiles
1.56 +# LDLIBS-c.so += $(gnulib)
1.57 +# # Give libc.so an entry point and make it directly runnable itself.
1.58 +# LDFLAGS-c.so += -e __libc_main
1.59 +#-# Force the backward compatibility EH functions to be linked.
1.60 +#-LDFLAGS-c.so += -u __register_frame
1.61 +# # Pre-link the objects of libc_pic.a so that we can locally resolve
1.62 +# # COMMON symbols before we link against ld.so. This is because ld.so
1.63 +# # contains some of libc_pic.a already, which will prevent the COMMONs
1.64 +--- libc/Makeconfig.jj 2003-07-22 08:25:32.000000000 -0400
1.65 ++++ libc/Makeconfig 2003-09-11 16:23:08.000000000 -0400
1.66 +@@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ link-libc-bounded = $(common-objpfx)libc
1.67 + link-extra-libs-bounded = $(foreach lib,$(LDLIBS-$(@F:%-bp=%)),$(common-objpfx)$(lib)_b.a)
1.68 +
1.69 + ifndef gnulib
1.70 +-gnulib := -lgcc -lgcc_eh
1.71 ++gnulib := -lgcc
1.72 + endif
1.73 + ifeq ($(elf),yes)
1.74 + +preinit = $(addprefix $(csu-objpfx),crti.o)
1.75 +
1.76 +
1.77 + Jakub
1.78 +