patches/glibc/ports-2.13/220-section-comments.patch
author Jang, Bongseo <graycells@gmail.com>
Sun Sep 23 11:18:30 2012 +0900 (2012-09-23)
changeset 3058 2800ef0ff450
permissions -rw-r--r--
libc/eglibc: Split changeset 3052:06b663f297 into eglibc/libc and eglibc/ports patches

crosstool-ng's glibc patche is made against glibc/libc sub-dir.
changeset 3052:06b663f297 is against glibc top-dir. it needs to split.

Signed-off-by: "Jang, Bongseo" <graycells@gmail.com>
[yann.morin.1998@free.fr: fix the ports patches depth]
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Message-ID: <5040c8e83e35618361dc.1348370890@localhost.localdomain>
PatchWork-ID: 186177
     1 http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2004-04/msg00665.html
     2 
     3 fixes building on some architectures (like m68k/arm/cris/etc...) because
     4 it does the right thing
     5 
     6 diff -durN glibc-2.13.orig/include/libc-symbols.h glibc-2.13/include/libc-symbols.h
     7 --- glibc-2.13.orig/include/libc-symbols.h	2009-03-14 00:51:46.000000000 +0100
     8 +++ glibc-2.13/include/libc-symbols.h	2009-11-13 00:50:07.000000000 +0100
     9 @@ -239,12 +239,12 @@
    10  #  define __make_section_unallocated(section_string)
    11  # endif
    12  
    13 -/* Tacking on "\n\t#" to the section name makes gcc put it's bogus
    14 +/* Tacking on "\n#APP\n\t#" to the section name makes gcc put it's bogus
    15     section attributes on what looks like a comment to the assembler.  */
    16  # ifdef HAVE_SECTION_QUOTES
    17 -#  define __sec_comment "\"\n\t#\""
    18 +#  define __sec_comment "\"\n#APP\n\t#\""
    19  # else
    20 -#  define __sec_comment "\n\t#"
    21 +#  define __sec_comment "\n#APP\n\t#"
    22  # endif
    23  # define link_warning(symbol, msg) \
    24    __make_section_unallocated (".gnu.warning." #symbol) \