scripts: refine static linking check to better guide the user

The current mechanism to check if static linking is possible, and the mesage
displayed on failure, can be puzzling to the unsuspecting user.

Also, the current implementation is not using the existing infrastructure,
and is thus difficult to enhance with new tests.

So, switch to using the standard CT_DoExecLog infra, and use four tests to
check for the host compiler:
- check we can run it
- check it can build a trivial program
- check it can statically link that program
- check if it statically link with libstdc++

That should cover most of the problems. Hopefully.

(At the same time, fix a typo in a comment)

Signed-off-by: Daniel Price <daniel.price@gmail.com>
[yann.morin.1998@free.fr: split original patch for self-contained changes]
[yann.morin.1998@free.fr: use steps to better see gcc's output]
[yann.morin.1998@free.fr: commit log]
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Message-Id: <163f86b5216fc08c672a.1353459722@nipigon.dssd.com>
Patchwork-Id: 200536

 # Dummy config file to not use a C library *at all*

 ## depends on BARE_METAL

 ##

 ## help Do not use a C library.

 ## help

 ## help This is usefull if your project is self-contained, does not rely on

 ## help an external C library, and provides all the necessary bits.

 ## help

 ## help Most probably usefull to bootloaders, as they generally don't depend

 ## help on the C library.

 ## help

 ## help If unsure: do *not* choose that, and use another option in the choice.