patches/binutils/2.22/999-ppc-textrels.patch
author "Benoît Thébaudeau" <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
Wed Dec 14 19:57:47 2011 +0100 (2011-12-14)
changeset 2810 43a3cb39a786
permissions -rw-r--r--
binutils/binutils: add the patches used by BuildRoot for 2.22

Signed-off-by: "Benoît Thébaudeau" <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
     1 http://bugs.gentoo.org/392645
     2 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13470
     3 
     4 2011-12-03  Alan Modra  <amodra@gmail.com>
     5 
     6 	PR ld/13470
     7 	* elf32-ppc.c (ppc_elf_copy_indirect_symbol): Revert substantive
     8 	change in 2011-07-01 commit.  Comment.
     9 	* elf64-ppc.c (ppc64_elf_copy_indirect_symbol): Likewise.
    10 
    11 diff -durN binutils-2.22.orig/bfd/elf32-ppc.c binutils-2.22/bfd/elf32-ppc.c
    12 --- binutils-2.22.orig/bfd/elf32-ppc.c	2011-11-21 10:29:21.000000000 +0100
    13 +++ binutils-2.22/bfd/elf32-ppc.c	2011-12-14 19:52:43.308784395 +0100
    14 @@ -2987,10 +2987,6 @@
    15    edir->elf.needs_plt |= eind->elf.needs_plt;
    16    edir->elf.pointer_equality_needed |= eind->elf.pointer_equality_needed;
    17  
    18 -  /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all.  */
    19 -  if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
    20 -    return;
    21 -
    22    if (eind->dyn_relocs != NULL)
    23      {
    24        if (edir->dyn_relocs != NULL)
    25 @@ -3022,6 +3018,16 @@
    26        eind->dyn_relocs = NULL;
    27      }
    28  
    29 +  /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all.
    30 +     You might think dyn_relocs need not be copied over;  After all,
    31 +     both syms will be dynamic or both non-dynamic so we're just
    32 +     moving reloc accounting around.  However, ELIMINATE_COPY_RELOCS 
    33 +     code in ppc_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol needs to check for
    34 +     dyn_relocs in read-only sections, and it does so on what is the
    35 +     DIR sym here.  */
    36 +  if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
    37 +    return;
    38 +
    39    /* Copy over the GOT refcount entries that we may have already seen to
    40       the symbol which just became indirect.  */
    41    edir->elf.got.refcount += eind->elf.got.refcount;
    42 diff -durN binutils-2.22.orig/bfd/elf64-ppc.c binutils-2.22/bfd/elf64-ppc.c
    43 --- binutils-2.22.orig/bfd/elf64-ppc.c	2011-11-21 10:29:24.000000000 +0100
    44 +++ binutils-2.22/bfd/elf64-ppc.c	2011-12-14 19:52:43.336784395 +0100
    45 @@ -4435,10 +4435,6 @@
    46    edir->elf.ref_regular_nonweak |= eind->elf.ref_regular_nonweak;
    47    edir->elf.needs_plt |= eind->elf.needs_plt;
    48  
    49 -  /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all.  */
    50 -  if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
    51 -    return;
    52 -
    53    /* Copy over any dynamic relocs we may have on the indirect sym.  */
    54    if (eind->dyn_relocs != NULL)
    55      {
    56 @@ -4471,6 +4467,16 @@
    57        eind->dyn_relocs = NULL;
    58      }
    59  
    60 +  /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all.
    61 +     You might think dyn_relocs need not be copied over;  After all,
    62 +     both syms will be dynamic or both non-dynamic so we're just
    63 +     moving reloc accounting around.  However, ELIMINATE_COPY_RELOCS 
    64 +     code in ppc64_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol needs to check for
    65 +     dyn_relocs in read-only sections, and it does so on what is the
    66 +     DIR sym here.  */
    67 +  if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
    68 +    return;
    69 +
    70    /* Copy over got entries that we may have already seen to the
    71       symbol which just became indirect.  */
    72    if (eind->elf.got.glist != NULL)