binutils/binutils: simplify gold dependencies

In preparation of adding a new kernel-type, Yann D. came up
with a change in semantic on binutils/gold availability.

So far, it was architectures' responsibility to declare that
they did support binutils/gold or not. It makes much more sense
that binutils/gold declares its own availability depending on
the current architecture; after all, architectures have no way
to know wether gold supports them, while gold does know it.

Signed-off-by:Yann Diorcet <diorcet.yann@gmail.com>
[yann.morin.1998@free.fr: split up original patch for self-contained changes]
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Message-Id: <d3d1d51f399e6d2c1163.1353320546@macbook-smorlat.local>
Patchwork-Id: 199971

 diff -durN gcc-4.4.0.orig/gcc/config/netbsd-elf.h gcc-4.4.0/gcc/config/netbsd-elf.h

 --- gcc-4.4.0.orig/gcc/config/netbsd-elf.h	2007-09-03 18:14:04.000000000 +0200

 +++ gcc-4.4.0/gcc/config/netbsd-elf.h	2009-05-27 21:38:14.000000000 +0200

 @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@

  #define NETBSD_LINK_SPEC_ELF \

    "%{assert*} %{R*} %{rpath*} \

     %{shared:-shared} \

 +   %{symbolic:-Bsymbolic} \

     %{!shared: \

       -dc -dp \

       %{!nostdlib: \