binutils/binutils: simplify gold dependencies

In preparation of adding a new kernel-type, Yann D. came up
with a change in semantic on binutils/gold availability.

So far, it was architectures' responsibility to declare that
they did support binutils/gold or not. It makes much more sense
that binutils/gold declares its own availability depending on
the current architecture; after all, architectures have no way
to know wether gold supports them, while gold does know it.

Signed-off-by:Yann Diorcet <diorcet.yann@gmail.com>
[yann.morin.1998@free.fr: split up original patch for self-contained changes]
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Message-Id: <d3d1d51f399e6d2c1163.1353320546@macbook-smorlat.local>
Patchwork-Id: 199971

 Original patch from Gentoo.

 -= BEGIN original header =-

 -= END original header =-

 diff -durN uClibc-0.9.30.orig/Rules.mak uClibc-0.9.30/Rules.mak

 --- uClibc-0.9.30.orig/Rules.mak	2008-11-12 13:24:16.000000000 +0100

 +++ uClibc-0.9.30/Rules.mak	2009-02-07 09:57:59.000000000 +0100

 @@ -519,6 +519,7 @@

  endif

  CFLAGS += $(call check_gcc,-std=gnu99,)

 +CFLAGS += $(call check_gcc,-fgnu89-inline,)

  LDFLAGS_NOSTRIP:=$(CPU_LDFLAGS-y) -Wl,-shared \

  	-Wl,--warn-common -Wl,--warn-once -Wl,-z,combreloc