patches/gcc/4.2.3/270-soft-float.patch
author "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Fri Jan 01 19:03:48 2010 +0100 (2010-01-01)
changeset 1676 6f836ab1b317
parent 616 6e78f7085707
permissions -rw-r--r--
cc/gcc: update ptachsets for gcc-4.4.{0,1,2}

As reported by Joachim Nilsson <jocke@vmlinux.org>
in: http://sourceware.org/ml/crossgcc/2010-01/msg00005.html

It seems I need to add the 4.3.4/290-index_macro.patch to the GCC 4.4.x
series as well. I immediately trigger the following libstdc++ bug for
4.4.2 with a uClibc .config which has UCLIBC_SUSV3_LEGACY_MACROS set[1].

http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/uclibc/2006-April/035991.html
     1 diff -uNpr gcc-4.2.1_orig/gcc/config/rs6000/darwin-ldouble.c gcc-4.2.1/gcc/config/rs6000/darwin-ldouble.c
     2 --- gcc-4.2.1_orig/gcc/config/rs6000/darwin-ldouble.c	2007-03-05 11:54:00.000000000 -0500
     3 +++ gcc-4.2.1/gcc/config/rs6000/darwin-ldouble.c	2008-01-31 17:51:24.000000000 -0500
     4 @@ -70,6 +70,8 @@ Software Foundation, 51 Franklin Street,
     5     but GCC currently generates poor code when a union is used to turn
     6     a long double into a pair of doubles.  */
     7  
     8 +#if defined (_SOFT_FLOAT) && defined (__LONG_DOUBLE_128__)
     9 +
    10  long double __gcc_qadd (double, double, double, double);
    11  long double __gcc_qsub (double, double, double, double);
    12  long double __gcc_qmul (double, double, double, double);
    13 @@ -219,8 +221,6 @@ __gcc_qdiv (double a, double b, double c
    14    return z.ldval;
    15  }
    16  
    17 -#if defined (_SOFT_FLOAT) && defined (__LONG_DOUBLE_128__)
    18 -
    19  long double __gcc_qneg (double, double);
    20  int __gcc_qeq (double, double, double, double);
    21  int __gcc_qne (double, double, double, double);