Mercurialcrosstool-ng / file revision
summary | shortlog | changelog | graph | tags | branches | files | changeset | file | latest | revisions | annotate | diff | raw | help
patches/glibc/ports-2.10.1/220-section-comments.patch
author "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Sun Jul 17 18:01:28 2011 +0200 (2011-07-17)
changeset 2895 86ea5204e9ce
permissions -rw-r--r--
libc/newlib: build newlib in the proper step

Currently, newlib is built in the start_file step, which is wrong, but was
needed when the baremetal integration was... well, 'unfinished'.

Now that we build the baremetal compiler from the final cc step, and a
proper core gcc in pass-1 and pass-2, we can move the newlib build to the
step do_libc, where it belongs.

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> 
     1 http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2004-04/msg00665.html

     2 

     3 fixes building on some architectures (like m68k/arm/cris/etc...) because

     4 it does the right thing

     5 

     6 diff -durN glibc-2.10.1.orig/include/libc-symbols.h glibc-2.10.1/include/libc-symbols.h

     7 --- glibc-2.10.1.orig/include/libc-symbols.h	2009-03-14 00:51:46.000000000 +0100

     8 +++ glibc-2.10.1/include/libc-symbols.h	2009-11-13 00:50:07.000000000 +0100

     9 @@ -239,12 +239,12 @@

    10  #  define __make_section_unallocated(section_string)

    11  # endif

    12  

    13 -/* Tacking on "\n\t#" to the section name makes gcc put it's bogus

    14 +/* Tacking on "\n#APP\n\t#" to the section name makes gcc put it's bogus

    15     section attributes on what looks like a comment to the assembler.  */

    16  # ifdef HAVE_SECTION_QUOTES

    17 -#  define __sec_comment "\"\n\t#\""

    18 +#  define __sec_comment "\"\n#APP\n\t#\""

    19  # else

    20 -#  define __sec_comment "\n\t#"

    21 +#  define __sec_comment "\n#APP\n\t#"

    22  # endif

    23  # define link_warning(symbol, msg) \

    24    __make_section_unallocated (".gnu.warning." #symbol) \
crosstool-ng