Hop, a somewhat more efficient progress bar, less CPU consuming, if that was a problem :-)
(a litlle recreation while toochains are building...)
2 FAIL: g++.jason/thunk3.C (test for excess errors)
3 on sh4-unknown-linux-gnu.
5 Does any sh variant *not* use the generic thunk support? If so, the patch should be
6 more cautious. As it is, it excludes all sh processors from this test.
9 ===================================================================
10 RCS file: /cvsroot/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.jason/thunk3.C,v
11 retrieving revision 1.13
12 diff -u -d -u -r1.13 thunk3.C
13 --- gcc-ss-3_3-20030714/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.jason/thunk3.C.old 25 Mar 2002 17:57:03 -0000 1.13
14 +++ gcc-ss-3_3-20030714/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.jason/thunk3.C 20 Jul 2003 16:57:38 -0000
16 // Note that this will break on any target that uses the generic thunk
17 // support, because it doesn't support variadic functions.
19 -// excess errors test - XFAIL mips*-*-* rs6000-*-* powerpc-*-eabi m68k-*-coff m68k-motorola-sysv m88k-motorola-sysv3 mn10300-*-* mn10200-*-* v850-*-* sh-*-* sh64-*-* h8*-*-* xtensa-*-*
20 +// excess errors test - XFAIL mips*-*-* rs6000-*-* powerpc-*-eabi m68k-*-coff m68k-motorola-sysv m88k-motorola-sysv3 mn10300-*-* mn10200-*-* v850-*-* sh*-*-* h8*-*-* xtensa-*-*