Mercurialcrosstool-ng / file revision
summary | shortlog | changelog | graph | tags | branches | files | changeset | file | latest | revisions | annotate | diff | raw | help
patches/glibc/2.9/160-i386-x86_64-revert-clone-cfi.patch
author "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Sun Jul 17 22:43:07 2011 +0200 (2011-07-17)
changeset 2893 a8a65758664f
parent 1201 c9967a6e3b25
permissions -rw-r--r--
cc/gcc: do not use the core pass-2 to build the baremetal compiler

In case we build a baremetal compiler, use the standard passes:
- core_cc is used to build the C library;
- as such, it is meant to run on build, not host;
- the final compiler is meant to run on host;

As the current final compiler step can not build a baremetal compiler,
call the core backend from the final step.

NB: Currently, newlib is built during the start_files pass, so we have
to have a core compiler by then... Once we can build the baremetal
compiler from the final cc step, then we can move the newlib build to
the proper step, and then get rid of the core pass-1 static compiler...

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> 
     1 Original patch from: gentoo/src/patchsets/glibc/2.9/0070_all_glibc-i386-x86_64-revert-clone-cfi.patch

     2 

     3 -= BEGIN original header =-

     4 revert cfi additions to clone on i386/x86_64 to workaround problems in

     5 gcc's unwinder code.  this is not a bug in glibc, it triggers problems

     6 elsewhere.  this cfi code does not gain us a whole lot anyways.

     7 

     8 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-12/msg00293.html

     9 

    10 -= END original header =-

    11 

    12 diff -durN glibc-2_9.orig/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/clone.S glibc-2_9/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/clone.S

    13 --- glibc-2_9.orig/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/clone.S	2006-12-04 00:12:36.000000000 +0100

    14 +++ glibc-2_9/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/clone.S	2009-02-02 22:00:45.000000000 +0100

    15 @@ -120,9 +120,6 @@

    16  	ret

    17  

    18  L(thread_start):

    19 -	cfi_startproc;

    20 -	/* Clearing frame pointer is insufficient, use CFI.  */

    21 -	cfi_undefined (eip);

    22  	/* Note: %esi is zero.  */

    23  	movl	%esi,%ebp	/* terminate the stack frame */

    24  #ifdef RESET_PID

    25 @@ -155,7 +152,6 @@

    26  	jmp	L(haspid)

    27  	.previous

    28  #endif

    29 -	cfi_endproc;

    30  

    31  	cfi_startproc

    32  PSEUDO_END (BP_SYM (__clone))

    33 diff -durN glibc-2_9.orig/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S glibc-2_9/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S

    34 --- glibc-2_9.orig/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S	2006-12-04 00:12:36.000000000 +0100

    35 +++ glibc-2_9/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S	2009-02-02 22:00:45.000000000 +0100

    36 @@ -89,9 +89,6 @@

    37  	ret

    38  

    39  L(thread_start):

    40 -	cfi_startproc;

    41 -	/* Clearing frame pointer is insufficient, use CFI.  */

    42 -	cfi_undefined (rip);

    43  	/* Clear the frame pointer.  The ABI suggests this be done, to mark

    44  	   the outermost frame obviously.  */

    45  	xorl	%ebp, %ebp

    46 @@ -116,7 +113,6 @@

    47  	/* Call exit with return value from function call. */

    48  	movq	%rax, %rdi

    49  	call	HIDDEN_JUMPTARGET (_exit)

    50 -	cfi_endproc;

    51  

    52  	cfi_startproc;

    53  PSEUDO_END (BP_SYM (__clone))
crosstool-ng