patches/binutils/2.17a/120-makeinfo-version.patch
author "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Thu Dec 27 12:45:22 2012 +0100 (2012-12-27)
changeset 3152 b286c7993be5
parent 558 6180835f7044
permissions -rw-r--r--
scripts/addToolsVersion: properly handle .in vs. .in.2

While most components have their version in the .in file, some
have it in the .in.2 (eg. elf2flt).

Currently, to handle this case, we indiscriminately munge both files,
but this is wrong: in the elf2flt case, if we add a binutils version,
we do not want it to be added to elf2flt, and conversely.

So, for each tool, we need to explicitly know what file to munge.

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
     1 diff -u binutils-2.18-orig/configure binutils-2.18/configure
     2 --- binutils-2.18-orig/configure	2007-08-06 16:29:40.000000000 -0400
     3 +++ binutils-2.18/configure	2007-09-27 22:41:51.000000000 -0400
     4 @@ -6125,10 +6125,10 @@
     5    *" texinfo "*) MAKEINFO='$$r/$(BUILD_SUBDIR)/texinfo/makeinfo/makeinfo' ;;
     6    *)
     7  
     8 -    # For an installed makeinfo, we require it to be from texinfo 4.4 or
     9 +    # For an installed makeinfo, we require it to be from texinfo 4.6 or
    10      # higher, else we use the "missing" dummy.
    11      if ${MAKEINFO} --version \
    12 -       | egrep 'texinfo[^0-9]*([1-3][0-9]|4\.[4-9]|[5-9])' >/dev/null 2>&1; then
    13 +       | egrep 'texinfo[^0-9]*(4\.([6-9]|[1-9][0-9])|[5-9]|[1-9][0-9])' >/dev/null 2>&1; then
    14        :
    15      else
    16        MAKEINFO="$MISSING makeinfo"