scripts/addToolsVersion: properly handle .in vs. .in.2
While most components have their version in the .in file, some
have it in the .in.2 (eg. elf2flt).
Currently, to handle this case, we indiscriminately munge both files,
but this is wrong: in the elf2flt case, if we add a binutils version,
we do not want it to be added to elf2flt, and conversely.
So, for each tool, we need to explicitly know what file to munge.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
2 ## 012_check_ldrunpath_length.dpatch by Chris Chimelis <chris@debian.org>
4 ## All lines beginning with `## DP:' are a description of the patch.
5 ## DP: Only generate an RPATH entry if LD_RUN_PATH is not empty, for
6 ## DP: cases where -rpath isn't specified. (#151024)
9 echo >&2 "`basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument"
13 [ -f debian/patches/00patch-opts ] && . debian/patches/00patch-opts
14 patch_opts="${patch_opts:--f --no-backup-if-mismatch}"
17 -patch) patch $patch_opts -p1 < $0;;
18 -unpatch) patch $patch_opts -p1 -R < $0;;
20 echo >&2 "`basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument"
27 diff -urNad /home/james/debian/packages/binutils/new/binutils-2.15/ld/emultempl/elf32.em binutils-2.15/ld/emultempl/elf32.em
29 diff -durN binutils-2.20.1.orig/ld/emultempl/elf32.em binutils-2.20.1/ld/emultempl/elf32.em
30 --- binutils-2.20.1.orig/ld/emultempl/elf32.em 2009-09-14 13:43:30.000000000 +0200
31 +++ binutils-2.20.1/ld/emultempl/elf32.em 2010-08-17 19:32:09.000000000 +0200
33 && command_line.rpath == NULL)
35 lib_path = (const char *) getenv ("LD_RUN_PATH");
36 + if ((lib_path) && (strlen (lib_path) == 0))
38 if (gld${EMULATION_NAME}_search_needed (lib_path, &n,
42 rpath = command_line.rpath;
44 rpath = (const char *) getenv ("LD_RUN_PATH");
45 + if ((rpath) && (strlen (rpath) == 0))
47 if (! (bfd_elf_size_dynamic_sections
48 (link_info.output_bfd, command_line.soname, rpath,
49 command_line.filter_shlib,