patches/glibc/ports-2.10.1/220-section-comments.patch
author "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Tue Jul 12 23:52:24 2011 +0200 (2011-07-12)
branch1.11
changeset 2558 b7317d2fe0e9
permissions -rw-r--r--
scripts, cc/gcc: do not fail on existing symlinks or build.log

If the user builds a toolchain over an existing one, so, without removing
CT_PREFIX_DIR, the build fails as the symlinks already exist, as does the
build.log.

This can also happen (for build.log) if the user first ran in download-
or extract-only.

Patch (with no SoB) originally from:
Phil Wilshire <phil.wilshire@overturenetworks.com>

Modified by me as it did not apply cleanly.

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
(transplanted from 1ebc2248cc60230cd53ff94ae8f8f1e3261461a3)
     1 http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2004-04/msg00665.html
     2 
     3 fixes building on some architectures (like m68k/arm/cris/etc...) because
     4 it does the right thing
     5 
     6 diff -durN glibc-2.10.1.orig/include/libc-symbols.h glibc-2.10.1/include/libc-symbols.h
     7 --- glibc-2.10.1.orig/include/libc-symbols.h	2009-03-14 00:51:46.000000000 +0100
     8 +++ glibc-2.10.1/include/libc-symbols.h	2009-11-13 00:50:07.000000000 +0100
     9 @@ -239,12 +239,12 @@
    10  #  define __make_section_unallocated(section_string)
    11  # endif
    12  
    13 -/* Tacking on "\n\t#" to the section name makes gcc put it's bogus
    14 +/* Tacking on "\n#APP\n\t#" to the section name makes gcc put it's bogus
    15     section attributes on what looks like a comment to the assembler.  */
    16  # ifdef HAVE_SECTION_QUOTES
    17 -#  define __sec_comment "\"\n\t#\""
    18 +#  define __sec_comment "\"\n#APP\n\t#\""
    19  # else
    20 -#  define __sec_comment "\n\t#"
    21 +#  define __sec_comment "\n#APP\n\t#"
    22  # endif
    23  # define link_warning(symbol, msg) \
    24    __make_section_unallocated (".gnu.warning." #symbol) \