Introduce the notion of a 'sample comment'.

- presence of the sample's reported.by file is now mandatory.
- when saving a sample, reporter name & URL are queried, to avoid operator forget about creating the reported.by file.
- when saving a sample, one can store a few-liner comment.
- when recalling a sample, the reporter name, URL and comment (if present) are printed.
- update the powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe sample to include Nate's comment (from his original mail).
- update all samples that were missing the reported.by file.

/trunk/scripts/saveSample.sh | 46 35 11 0 ++++++++++++++++++------
/trunk/scripts/showSamples.sh | 12 6 6 0 +++---
/trunk/samples/powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe/reported.by | 15 15 0 0 ++++++++
/trunk/samples/samples.mk | 22 17 5 0 +++++++++--
4 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

 # GMP options

 choice

     bool

     prompt "MPFR version"

 config MPFR_V_2_3_1

     bool

     prompt "2.3.1"

 config MPFR_V_2_3_2

     bool

     prompt "2.3.2"

 # CT_INSERT_VERSION_ABOVE

 # Don't remove above line!

 endchoice

 config MPFR_VERSION

     string

     default "2.3.1" if MPFR_V_2_3_1

     default "2.3.2" if MPFR_V_2_3_2

 # CT_INSERT_VERSION_STRING_ABOVE

 # Don't remove above line!

 config MPFR_CHECK

     bool

     prompt "Check MPFR"

     default y

     help

       It is highly recommended that 'make check' is run against the newly built

       MPFR library. See http://gmplib.org/