patches/gcc/2.95.3/140-deque-leak-fix.patch
author "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Tue Oct 14 21:30:27 2008 +0000 (2008-10-14)
changeset 935 e175e3538310
permissions -rw-r--r--
Introduce the notion of a 'sample comment'.

- presence of the sample's reported.by file is now mandatory.
- when saving a sample, reporter name & URL are queried, to avoid operator forget about creating the reported.by file.
- when saving a sample, one can store a few-liner comment.
- when recalling a sample, the reporter name, URL and comment (if present) are printed.
- update the powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe sample to include Nate's comment (from his original mail).
- update all samples that were missing the reported.by file.

/trunk/scripts/saveSample.sh | 46 35 11 0 ++++++++++++++++++------
/trunk/scripts/showSamples.sh | 12 6 6 0 +++---
/trunk/samples/powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe/reported.by | 15 15 0 0 ++++++++
/trunk/samples/samples.mk | 22 17 5 0 +++++++++--
4 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
     1 [See also http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2001-11/msg00133.html ]
     2 
     3 Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 16:06:22 -0500
     4 From: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
     5 To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
     6 Subject: [libstdc++ trunk & 3.0]  Fix deque memory leak
     7 Message-ID: <20011116160622.A23094@disaster.jaj.com>
     8 
     9 
    10 As discussed on the libstdc++ mailing list.  Tested on i686/linux.
    11 
    12 
    13 
    14 2001-11-16  Paolo Carlini  <pcarlini@unitus.it>
    15 
    16 	* include/bits/stl_deque.h (deque::erase()):  Fix memory leak.
    17 
    18 
    19 [rediffed against 2.95.3 -- dank]
    20 
    21 --- gcc-2.95.3/libstdc++/stl/stl_deque.h.old	2001-01-01 09:48:22.000000000 -0800
    22 +++ gcc-2.95.3/libstdc++/stl/stl_deque.h	2006-02-18 15:24:17.000000000 -0800
    23 @@ -1052,7 +1052,7 @@
    24        copy_backward(_M_start, __first, __last);
    25        iterator __new_start = _M_start + __n;
    26        destroy(_M_start, __new_start);
    27 -      _M_destroy_nodes(__new_start._M_node, _M_start._M_node);
    28 +      _M_destroy_nodes(_M_start._M_node, __new_start._M_node);  /* fixed per http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2001-11/msg00139.html */
    29        _M_start = __new_start;
    30      }
    31      else {