Introduce the notion of a 'sample comment'.
- presence of the sample's reported.by file is now mandatory.
- when saving a sample, reporter name & URL are queried, to avoid operator forget about creating the reported.by file.
- when saving a sample, one can store a few-liner comment.
- when recalling a sample, the reporter name, URL and comment (if present) are printed.
- update the powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe sample to include Nate's comment (from his original mail).
- update all samples that were missing the reported.by file.
/trunk/scripts/saveSample.sh | 46 35 11 0 ++++++++++++++++++------
/trunk/scripts/showSamples.sh | 12 6 6 0 +++---
/trunk/samples/powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe/reported.by | 15 15 0 0 ++++++++
/trunk/samples/samples.mk | 22 17 5 0 +++++++++--
4 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
1 diff -durN gcc-3.4.6.orig/gcc/flow.c gcc-3.4.6/gcc/flow.c
2 --- gcc-3.4.6.orig/gcc/flow.c 2005-09-01 22:51:09.000000000 +0200
3 +++ gcc-3.4.6/gcc/flow.c 2007-08-15 23:00:30.000000000 +0200
5 rtx set_src = SET_SRC (pc_set (BB_END (bb)));
6 rtx cond_true = XEXP (set_src, 0);
7 rtx reg = XEXP (cond_true, 0);
8 + enum rtx_code inv_cond;
10 if (GET_CODE (reg) == SUBREG)
11 reg = SUBREG_REG (reg);
12 @@ -1892,11 +1893,13 @@
13 in the form of a comparison of a register against zero.
14 If the condition is more complex than that, then it is safe
15 not to record any information. */
16 - if (GET_CODE (reg) == REG
17 + inv_cond = reversed_comparison_code (cond_true, BB_END (bb));
18 + if (inv_cond != UNKNOWN
19 + && GET_CODE (reg) == REG
20 && XEXP (cond_true, 1) == const0_rtx)
23 - = gen_rtx_fmt_ee (reverse_condition (GET_CODE (cond_true)),
24 + = gen_rtx_fmt_ee (inv_cond,
25 GET_MODE (cond_true), XEXP (cond_true, 0),
27 if (GET_CODE (XEXP (set_src, 1)) == PC)