crosstool-ng: patches/strace/4.5.17/110-dont-use-REG

arch/powerpc: add powerpc64le support

Technically, I don't forbid powerpcle support either, but I'm not sure that
there is any library/compiler support for that at the moment (though the hw
technically makes it possible).

powerpc64le needs glibc 2.19 and gcc 4.9. I haven't looked into the support
tools, but at least gdb 7.5 is too old (7.7.1 definitely has support).

Also make powerpc64 non-experimental. It's practically old at this point.

Signed-off-by: Cody P Schafer <dev@codyps.com>
[yann.morin.1998@free.fr: use ${target_endian_le} and ${target_bits_64}]
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Message-Id: <64bfbbced9dd8f62e0d6.1399801945@gun>
Patchwork-Id: 347775

     1 Original patch from gentoo: ../../dev/crosstool-NG/ct-ng.trunk/patches/strace/4.5.17/110-dont-use-REG_SYSCALL-for-sh.patch

     2 -= BEGIN original header =-

     3 diff -dur strace-4.5.16.orig/process.c strace-4.5.16/process.c

     4 -= END original header =-

     5 diff -durN strace-4.5.17.orig/process.c strace-4.5.17/process.c

     6 --- strace-4.5.17.orig/process.c	2008-07-18 04:16:47.000000000 +0200

     7 +++ strace-4.5.17/process.c	2008-10-24 21:30:13.000000000 +0200

     8 @@ -2726,7 +2726,6 @@

     9         { 4*REG_GBR,            "4*REG_GBR"                             },

    10         { 4*REG_MACH,           "4*REG_MACH"                            },

    11         { 4*REG_MACL,           "4*REG_MACL"                            },

    12 -       { 4*REG_SYSCALL,        "4*REG_SYSCALL"                         },

    13         { 4*REG_FPUL,           "4*REG_FPUL"                            },

    14         { 4*REG_FPREG0,         "4*REG_FPREG0"                          },

    15         { 4*(REG_FPREG0+1),     "4*REG_FPREG1"                          },

author	Cody P Schafer <dev@codyps.com>
	Mon May 12 00:02:13 2014 +0200 (2014-05-12)
changeset 3322	eb13867a034c
parent 747	d3e603e7c17c
permissions	-rw-r--r--