Add the full crosstool-NG sources to the new repository of its own.
You might just say: 'Yeah! crosstool-NG's got its own repo!".
Unfortunately, that's because the previous repo got damaged beyond repair and I had no backup.
That means I'm putting backups in place in the afternoon.
That also means we've lost history... :-(
1 See http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11902
3 Part of fix for abort on line
4 assert (info[DT_RPATH] == NULL);
5 in glibc-2.3.2's ld.so, which makes all dynamically-linked
8 Message-Id: <200308020452.h724q0n01509@r-rr.iij4u.or.jp>
10 Cc: kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp
11 Subject: Re: Writing PIC version of __udivsi3_i4?
12 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 01 Aug 2003 21:15:27 -0700"
13 <3F2B3ADF.6030206@kegel.com>
14 References: <3F2B3ADF.6030206@kegel.com>
15 Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2003 13:58:05 +0900
16 From: kaz Kojima <kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp>
18 Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com> wrote:
19 > It seems it might be from gcc's spec file:
21 > *subtarget_link_spec:
22 > %{shared:-shared} %{!static: %{rdynamic:-export-dynamic} %{!dynamic-linker:-dynamic-linker /lib/ld-linux.so.2} %{!rpath:-rpath /lib}} %{static:-static}
24 > as the only place -rpath showed up was in the output of gcc -v as it
25 > was linking libc.so.
27 > Well, that's a clue, anyway! Guess I'll dig through the spec files
28 > tomorrow to see if I can figure it out some more.
30 I've grepped gcc/config/*/*.h and found only SH and old libc1 stuffs
31 of i386/alpha include %{!rpath:-rpath ... in 3.3 release and the
32 current CVS. And my sh-gcc's specs doesn't have this :-(
33 It would be the Right Thing to remove this stuff simply. How about
39 --- gcc-3.3/gcc/config/sh/linux.h.orig Sat Aug 2 13:20:57 2003
40 +++ gcc-3.3/gcc/config/sh/linux.h Sat Aug 2 13:22:42 2003
41 @@ -48,8 +48,7 @@ do { \
44 %{rdynamic:-export-dynamic} \
45 - %{!dynamic-linker:-dynamic-linker /lib/ld-linux.so.2} \
46 - %{!rpath:-rpath /lib}} \
47 + %{!dynamic-linker:-dynamic-linker /lib/ld-linux.so.2}} \
50 /* The GNU C++ standard library requires that these macros be defined. */