patches/glibc/2.9/210-2.9-strlen-hack.patch
author Michael Hope <michael.hope@linaro.org>
Wed Oct 19 15:27:32 2011 +1300 (2011-10-19)
changeset 2739 f320e22f2cba
parent 1201 c9967a6e3b25
permissions -rw-r--r--
arch: add softfp support

Some architectures support a mixed hard/soft floating point, where
the compiler emits hardware floating point instructions, but passes
the operands in core (aka integer) registers.

For example, ARM supports this mode (to come in the next changeset).

Add support for softfp cross compilers to the GCC and GLIBC
configuration. Needed for Ubuntu and other distros that are softfp.

Signed-off-by: Michael Hope <michael.hope@linaro.org>
[yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr: split the original patch]
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
     1 Original patch from: gentoo/src/patchsets/glibc/2.9/1020_all_glibc-2.9-strlen-hack.patch
     2 
     3 -= BEGIN original header =-
     4 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5807
     5 http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~am21/progtricks.html
     6 
     7 -= END original header =-
     8 
     9 diff -durN glibc-2_9.orig/string/strlen.c glibc-2_9/string/strlen.c
    10 --- glibc-2_9.orig/string/strlen.c	2005-12-14 12:09:07.000000000 +0100
    11 +++ glibc-2_9/string/strlen.c	2009-02-02 22:00:51.000000000 +0100
    12 @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
    13  {
    14    const char *char_ptr;
    15    const unsigned long int *longword_ptr;
    16 -  unsigned long int longword, magic_bits, himagic, lomagic;
    17 +  unsigned long int longword, himagic, lomagic;
    18  
    19    /* Handle the first few characters by reading one character at a time.
    20       Do this until CHAR_PTR is aligned on a longword boundary.  */
    21 @@ -42,28 +42,14 @@
    22      if (*char_ptr == '\0')
    23        return char_ptr - str;
    24  
    25 -  /* All these elucidatory comments refer to 4-byte longwords,
    26 -     but the theory applies equally well to 8-byte longwords.  */
    27 -
    28    longword_ptr = (unsigned long int *) char_ptr;
    29  
    30 -  /* Bits 31, 24, 16, and 8 of this number are zero.  Call these bits
    31 -     the "holes."  Note that there is a hole just to the left of
    32 -     each byte, with an extra at the end:
    33 -
    34 -     bits:  01111110 11111110 11111110 11111111
    35 -     bytes: AAAAAAAA BBBBBBBB CCCCCCCC DDDDDDDD
    36 -
    37 -     The 1-bits make sure that carries propagate to the next 0-bit.
    38 -     The 0-bits provide holes for carries to fall into.  */
    39 -  magic_bits = 0x7efefeffL;
    40    himagic = 0x80808080L;
    41    lomagic = 0x01010101L;
    42    if (sizeof (longword) > 4)
    43      {
    44        /* 64-bit version of the magic.  */
    45        /* Do the shift in two steps to avoid a warning if long has 32 bits.  */
    46 -      magic_bits = ((0x7efefefeL << 16) << 16) | 0xfefefeffL;
    47        himagic = ((himagic << 16) << 16) | himagic;
    48        lomagic = ((lomagic << 16) << 16) | lomagic;
    49      }
    50 @@ -75,56 +61,12 @@
    51       if *any of the four* bytes in the longword in question are zero.  */
    52    for (;;)
    53      {
    54 -      /* We tentatively exit the loop if adding MAGIC_BITS to
    55 -	 LONGWORD fails to change any of the hole bits of LONGWORD.
    56 -
    57 -	 1) Is this safe?  Will it catch all the zero bytes?
    58 -	 Suppose there is a byte with all zeros.  Any carry bits
    59 -	 propagating from its left will fall into the hole at its
    60 -	 least significant bit and stop.  Since there will be no
    61 -	 carry from its most significant bit, the LSB of the
    62 -	 byte to the left will be unchanged, and the zero will be
    63 -	 detected.
    64 -
    65 -	 2) Is this worthwhile?  Will it ignore everything except
    66 -	 zero bytes?  Suppose every byte of LONGWORD has a bit set
    67 -	 somewhere.  There will be a carry into bit 8.  If bit 8
    68 -	 is set, this will carry into bit 16.  If bit 8 is clear,
    69 -	 one of bits 9-15 must be set, so there will be a carry
    70 -	 into bit 16.  Similarly, there will be a carry into bit
    71 -	 24.  If one of bits 24-30 is set, there will be a carry
    72 -	 into bit 31, so all of the hole bits will be changed.
    73 -
    74 -	 The one misfire occurs when bits 24-30 are clear and bit
    75 -	 31 is set; in this case, the hole at bit 31 is not
    76 -	 changed.  If we had access to the processor carry flag,
    77 -	 we could close this loophole by putting the fourth hole
    78 -	 at bit 32!
    79 -
    80 -	 So it ignores everything except 128's, when they're aligned
    81 -	 properly.  */
    82 -
    83        longword = *longword_ptr++;
    84  
    85 -      if (
    86 -#if 0
    87 -	  /* Add MAGIC_BITS to LONGWORD.  */
    88 -	  (((longword + magic_bits)
    89 -
    90 -	    /* Set those bits that were unchanged by the addition.  */
    91 -	    ^ ~longword)
    92 -
    93 -	   /* Look at only the hole bits.  If any of the hole bits
    94 -	      are unchanged, most likely one of the bytes was a
    95 -	      zero.  */
    96 -	   & ~magic_bits)
    97 -#else
    98 -	  ((longword - lomagic) & himagic)
    99 -#endif
   100 -	  != 0)
   101 +      /* This hack taken from Alan Mycroft's HAKMEMC postings.
   102 +         See: http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~am21/progtricks.html */
   103 +      if (((longword - lomagic) & ~longword & himagic) != 0)
   104  	{
   105 -	  /* Which of the bytes was the zero?  If none of them were, it was
   106 -	     a misfire; continue the search.  */
   107  
   108  	  const char *cp = (const char *) (longword_ptr - 1);
   109