patches/glibc/ports-2.12.1/220-section-comments.patch
author "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Sun Jul 17 17:56:22 2011 +0200 (2011-07-17)
changeset 2889 f3b2199620f1
permissions -rw-r--r--
cc/gcc: pass the install prefix to the core passes

Currently, the discrimination on the core compilers prefixes depends on
the type of core compiler to build.

This is not correct, and the caller of the core backend should specify
the prefix.

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
     1 http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2004-04/msg00665.html
     2 
     3 fixes building on some architectures (like m68k/arm/cris/etc...) because
     4 it does the right thing
     5 
     6 diff -durN glibc-2.12.1.orig/include/libc-symbols.h glibc-2.12.1/include/libc-symbols.h
     7 --- glibc-2.12.1.orig/include/libc-symbols.h	2009-03-14 00:51:46.000000000 +0100
     8 +++ glibc-2.12.1/include/libc-symbols.h	2009-11-13 00:50:07.000000000 +0100
     9 @@ -239,12 +239,12 @@
    10  #  define __make_section_unallocated(section_string)
    11  # endif
    12  
    13 -/* Tacking on "\n\t#" to the section name makes gcc put it's bogus
    14 +/* Tacking on "\n#APP\n\t#" to the section name makes gcc put it's bogus
    15     section attributes on what looks like a comment to the assembler.  */
    16  # ifdef HAVE_SECTION_QUOTES
    17 -#  define __sec_comment "\"\n\t#\""
    18 +#  define __sec_comment "\"\n#APP\n\t#\""
    19  # else
    20 -#  define __sec_comment "\n\t#"
    21 +#  define __sec_comment "\n#APP\n\t#"
    22  # endif
    23  # define link_warning(symbol, msg) \
    24    __make_section_unallocated (".gnu.warning." #symbol) \