patches/gcc/4.3.2/280-c99-complex-ugly-hack.patch
author "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Tue Aug 31 23:24:40 2010 +0200 (2010-08-31)
changeset 2107 f5ab0a80e466
parent 757 90e887b06da3
permissions -rw-r--r--
binutils/binutils: remove faulty patch

The added code should be conditinal to the target system
being !MIPS, but is based on the host system being !MIPS.

This is plain wrong, and had not been noticed until now
as I never used those binutils versions on MIPS.

See:
http://sourceware.org/ml/crossgcc/2010-08/msg00192.html

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
     1 Original patch from gentoo: gentoo/src/patchsets/gcc/4.3.1/uclibc/90_all_303-c99-complex-ugly-hack.patch
     2 diff -durN gcc-4.3.2.orig/libstdc++-v3/configure gcc-4.3.2/libstdc++-v3/configure
     3 --- gcc-4.3.2.orig/libstdc++-v3/configure	2008-07-07 21:49:54.000000000 +0200
     4 +++ gcc-4.3.2/libstdc++-v3/configure	2008-09-23 19:45:27.000000000 +0200
     5 @@ -38935,6 +38935,9 @@
     6  cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF
     7  /* end confdefs.h.  */
     8  #include <complex.h>
     9 +#ifdef __UCLIBC__
    10 +#error ugly hack to make sure configure test fails here for cross until uClibc supports the complex funcs
    11 +#endif
    12  int
    13  main ()
    14  {