patches/glibc/2.9/280-section-comments.patch
author "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Tue Aug 31 23:24:40 2010 +0200 (2010-08-31)
changeset 2107 f5ab0a80e466
parent 1201 c9967a6e3b25
permissions -rw-r--r--
binutils/binutils: remove faulty patch

The added code should be conditinal to the target system
being !MIPS, but is based on the host system being !MIPS.

This is plain wrong, and had not been noticed until now
as I never used those binutils versions on MIPS.

See:
http://sourceware.org/ml/crossgcc/2010-08/msg00192.html

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
     1 Original patch from: gentoo/src/patchsets/glibc/2.9/1075_all_glibc-section-comments.patch
     2 
     3 -= BEGIN original header =-
     4 http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2004-04/msg00665.html
     5 
     6 fixes building on some architectures (like m68k/arm/cris/etc...) because
     7 it does the right thing
     8 
     9 -= END original header =-
    10 
    11 diff -durN glibc-2_9.orig/include/libc-symbols.h glibc-2_9/include/libc-symbols.h
    12 --- glibc-2_9.orig/include/libc-symbols.h	2006-11-09 16:57:12.000000000 +0100
    13 +++ glibc-2_9/include/libc-symbols.h	2009-02-02 22:01:00.000000000 +0100
    14 @@ -240,12 +240,12 @@
    15  #  define __make_section_unallocated(section_string)
    16  # endif
    17  
    18 -/* Tacking on "\n\t#" to the section name makes gcc put it's bogus
    19 +/* Tacking on "\n#APP\n\t#" to the section name makes gcc put it's bogus
    20     section attributes on what looks like a comment to the assembler.  */
    21  # ifdef HAVE_SECTION_QUOTES
    22 -#  define __sec_comment "\"\n\t#\""
    23 +#  define __sec_comment "\"\n#APP\n\t#\""
    24  # else
    25 -#  define __sec_comment "\n\t#"
    26 +#  define __sec_comment "\n#APP\n\t#"
    27  # endif
    28  # define link_warning(symbol, msg) \
    29    __make_section_unallocated (".gnu.warning." #symbol) \