patches/glibc/ports-2.10.1/220-section-comments.patch
author "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Fri Nov 13 21:37:18 2009 +0100 (2009-11-13)
changeset 1625 fde082da9813
permissions -rw-r--r--
libc/glibc: add 2.10.1

Woo... It seems the glibc guys finally decided that tarballs
were not deprecated, in fact.

The patchset was vampirised from Gentoo (kudos, guys!), and
applies to glibc+ports, so that's why it's been added as a
patchset against ports, not against glibc.
     1 http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2004-04/msg00665.html
     2 
     3 fixes building on some architectures (like m68k/arm/cris/etc...) because
     4 it does the right thing
     5 
     6 diff -durN glibc-2.10.1.orig/include/libc-symbols.h glibc-2.10.1/include/libc-symbols.h
     7 --- glibc-2.10.1.orig/include/libc-symbols.h	2009-03-14 00:51:46.000000000 +0100
     8 +++ glibc-2.10.1/include/libc-symbols.h	2009-11-13 00:50:07.000000000 +0100
     9 @@ -239,12 +239,12 @@
    10  #  define __make_section_unallocated(section_string)
    11  # endif
    12  
    13 -/* Tacking on "\n\t#" to the section name makes gcc put it's bogus
    14 +/* Tacking on "\n#APP\n\t#" to the section name makes gcc put it's bogus
    15     section attributes on what looks like a comment to the assembler.  */
    16  # ifdef HAVE_SECTION_QUOTES
    17 -#  define __sec_comment "\"\n\t#\""
    18 +#  define __sec_comment "\"\n#APP\n\t#\""
    19  # else
    20 -#  define __sec_comment "\n\t#"
    21 +#  define __sec_comment "\n#APP\n\t#"
    22  # endif
    23  # define link_warning(symbol, msg) \
    24    __make_section_unallocated (".gnu.warning." #symbol) \