2011-02-27kernel/linux: add latest 2.6.37.2 version
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Sun, 27 Feb 2011 22:14:12 +0100] rev 2325
kernel/linux: add latest 2.6.37.2 version

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-02-27binutils/sstrip: build statically for static toolchains
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Sun, 27 Feb 2011 15:34:30 +0100] rev 2324
binutils/sstrip: build statically for static toolchains

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-02-27binutils/elf2flt: remove trailing spaces
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Sun, 27 Feb 2011 16:20:47 +0100] rev 2323
binutils/elf2flt: remove trailing spaces

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-02-27docs: rename chapter 9
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Sun, 27 Feb 2011 15:27:54 +0100] rev 2322
docs: rename chapter 9

Rename the file so that it is the same name as the chapter.

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-02-24docs: add chapter 9 to ToC
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Thu, 24 Feb 2011 22:38:08 +0100] rev 2321
docs: add chapter 9 to ToC

Missed in the previous commit... :-/

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-02-24docs: add an in-depth explanations of the build steps
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Thu, 24 Feb 2011 22:31:15 +0100] rev 2320
docs: add an in-depth explanations of the build steps

The build process is quite complex: gcc is built three times, there are
two C library steps, there are those companion libraries...

People often wonder what all these steps do, and why they are needed.

Recently, someone proposed a tutorial on the crossgcc mailing list:
http://sourceware.org/ml/crossgcc/2011-01/msg00059.html

This meant that there was a need for such a tutorial, and explanations
on how a toolchain is built. So i decide to extend my answers:
http://sourceware.org/ml/crossgcc/2011-01/msg00060.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/crossgcc/2011-01/msg00125.html

into proper documentation in crosstool-NG.

Thanks go to Francesco for suggesting this. He has a fine tutorial
for beginners there:
http://fturco.org/wiki/doku.php?id=debian:cross-compiler

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-02-23complibs/mpc: add latest version 0.9
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Wed, 23 Feb 2011 00:12:16 +0100] rev 2319
complibs/mpc: add latest version 0.9

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-02-23complibs/ppl: add latest version 0.11.1
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Wed, 23 Feb 2011 00:10:57 +0100] rev 2318
complibs/ppl: add latest version 0.11.1

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-02-22kernel/linux: fix typo in version string
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Tue, 22 Feb 2011 23:47:15 +0100] rev 2317
kernel/linux: fix typo in version string

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-02-22cc/gcc: do not build plugins for static toolchains
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Tue, 22 Feb 2011 23:27:42 +0100] rev 2316
cc/gcc: do not build plugins for static toolchains

Plugins are shared objects, and when building a toolchain statically,
the gcc build system breaks havok (although there is no hard technical
reasons it should not be possible)...

And consequently, do not enable plugin supoprt in binutils.

Reported-by: Thomas Spurden <thomas@ado.is-a-geek.net>
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-02-21libc/glibc: LinuxThreads are no longer supported in latest versions
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Mon, 21 Feb 2011 23:42:20 +0100] rev 2315
libc/glibc: LinuxThreads are no longer supported in latest versions

In fact, it is only supported in a few legacy versions.

Keep LT available for all eglibc versions, although it might need
a similar safeguard...

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-02-21libc/glibc: fix dubious construct when installing headers
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Mon, 21 Feb 2011 19:27:28 +0100] rev 2314
libc/glibc: fix dubious construct when installing headers

This is dubious because if the copy fails, then we'll miss the error.

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-02-21libc/glibc: only install start files for NPTL
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Mon, 21 Feb 2011 19:20:19 +0100] rev 2313
libc/glibc: only install start files for NPTL

Building the start files requires a shared-capable compiler, which we do
not have when the threading implementation is LinuxThreads.

So, only build the start files when the threading implementations is NPTL.

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-02-21libc/glibc: add fortify option
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Mon, 21 Feb 2011 23:39:46 +0100] rev 2312
libc/glibc: add fortify option

By default, recent versions of glibc and eglibc will build some
functions that take format strings (eg. printf, syslog...) with
run-time checks against some format string attacks. This is
called a fortified build.

Unfortunately, this fails somehow while building the instrumented
version of syslog, with some kind of circular dependency...

Disable fortified builds by default, and hide the enabling option
behind EXPERIMENTAL for daring users...

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-02-21internals: don't remove lib64 symlinks in sysroot
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:39:24 +0100] rev 2311
internals: don't remove lib64 symlinks in sysroot

The lib64 symlinks are needed for the linker to find the libraries.

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-02-21kernel/linux: add latest versions
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Mon, 21 Feb 2011 23:17:45 +0100] rev 2310
kernel/linux: add latest versions

... and remove old versions.

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2010-12-18comptools: install them side-to-side with build tools
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Sat, 18 Dec 2010 22:55:56 +0100] rev 2309
comptools: install them side-to-side with build tools

As companion tools might or might not be used to build each
toolchain, they do belong to that toolchain's build tools,
not to the generic override tools.

Fix a typo in the autoconf URL.

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2010-12-20buildtools: the buildtools dir is in fact a prefix
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Mon, 20 Dec 2010 00:07:29 +0100] rev 2308
buildtools: the buildtools dir is in fact a prefix

Consider the buildtools install directory as a prefix directory,
that is, install buildtools in prefix/bin/, not in prefix/.

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2010-12-23buildtools: move to working directory
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Thu, 23 Dec 2010 20:43:32 +0100] rev 2307
buildtools: move to working directory

There is absolutely *no* reason for the buildtools (wrappers to gcc, g++,
as, ld... for the local machine) to be in the toolchain directory. Moreover,
they are removed after the build completes.

Move them out of the toolchain directory, and into the build directory (but
yet the part specific to the current toolchain). This means we no longer
need to explicitly remove them either, BTW, but we need to save/restore them
for the restart feature.

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-02-20buildtools: store path to buildtools in a variable
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Sun, 20 Feb 2011 22:12:43 +0100] rev 2306
buildtools: store path to buildtools in a variable

Currently, the buildtools are installed relative to ${CT_PREFIX_DIR}.
Change that by introducing ${CT_BUILDTOOLS_DIR}, which is
still set relative to ${CT_PREFIX_DIR}, but which will make it easy
to change in the future.

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-01-22scripts: create the makeinfo wrapper before we set PATH
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Sat, 22 Jan 2011 23:20:18 +0100] rev 2305
scripts: create the makeinfo wrapper before we set PATH

If we set PATH to the tools wrappers before we create the
makeinfo wrapper, then we may well wrap an existing wrapper
from a previous run.

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-01-22kernel: move the headers install step
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Sat, 22 Jan 2011 22:52:57 +0100] rev 2304
kernel: move the headers install step

The kernel headers are only needed just before we build
the C library headers, and need not be present before.

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-02-17debug/gdb: add versions from Linaro
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Thu, 17 Feb 2011 23:05:34 +0100] rev 2303
debug/gdb: add versions from Linaro

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-02-17cc/gcc: add versions from Linaro
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:29:33 +0100] rev 2302
cc/gcc: add versions from Linaro

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-02-17internals: fix stripping host binaries
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Thu, 17 Feb 2011 21:54:07 +0100] rev 2301
internals: fix stripping host binaries

The gcc used by linaro has a version number specific to Linaro, but
identifies itself with its upstream version numbering scheme.

This breaks the strip in the finish step, because the actual gcc version
is not the same as the configured one (eg. 4.5.2 vs. linaro-4.5-2011.02-0).

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-02-12libc/eglibc: Make eglibc 2.11 and 2.12 not experimental
Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@gmail.com> [Sat, 12 Feb 2011 17:31:12 +0100] rev 2300
libc/eglibc: Make eglibc 2.11 and 2.12 not experimental

I haven't noticed the usual experimental testers complain about eglibc
2.11 or 2.12 being unstable. So stop marking them as experimental.

Signed-off-by: Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@gmail.com>

2011-02-12libc/eglibc: Add 2.13 branch
Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@gmail.com> [Sat, 12 Feb 2011 17:30:53 +0100] rev 2299
libc/eglibc: Add 2.13 branch

Signed-off-by: Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@gmail.com>

2011-02-011.10: update version to 1.10.0+hg 1.10
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:20:35 +0100] rev 2298
1.10: update version to 1.10.0+hg

2011-02-01Tagging release 1.10.0 1.10
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:20:35 +0100] rev 2297
Tagging release 1.10.0

2011-02-011.10: create maintenance branch, update version to 1.10.0 1.10 crosstool-ng-1.10.0
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:20:35 +0100] rev 2296
1.10: create maintenance branch, update version to 1.10.0

2011-02-011.9: close branch 1.9
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:19:25 +0100] rev 2295
1.9: close branch

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-02-011.9: update version to 1.9.3+hg 1.9
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:11:19 +0100] rev 2294
1.9: update version to 1.9.3+hg

2011-02-01Tagging release 1.9.3 1.9
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:11:19 +0100] rev 2293
Tagging release 1.9.3

2011-02-011.9: update version to 1.9.3 1.9 crosstool-ng-1.9.3
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:11:19 +0100] rev 2292
1.9: update version to 1.9.3

2011-01-26libc/mingw: do not remove support symlink 1.9
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Wed, 26 Jan 2011 00:04:41 +0100] rev 2291
libc/mingw: do not remove support symlink

Under mingw, it seems that there is a mix between the traditional /usr
directory, and a similar-purposed /mingw directory (both in the sysroot).

Currently, we create /mingw as a symlink to /usr, and we removed it in
the libc-finish step.

Unfortunately, this prevents the pre-processor to find the headers.
Keeping the symlink makes it magically work...

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
(transplanted from fa5c70b11fecf390c78780fe8f8ba0a836a59e92)

2011-01-30samples: update the samples
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Sun, 30 Jan 2011 19:25:56 +0100] rev 2290
samples: update the samples

Release time is coming at a fast pace. It is now time to
update the samples so they apply cleanly.

The canadian-cross sample mingw32,i686-none-linux-gnu has
been replaced with i586-mingw32msvc,i686-none-linux-gnu.

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-01-31libc/glibc: add option to force unwind
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:52:18 +0100] rev 2289
libc/glibc: add option to force unwind

We make it an option, as not all combinations of architectures
vs. compiler vs. glibc/eglibc exhibit the issue. Mostly visible
on old glibc versions, it seems...

This is a missing part from the glibc/eglibc merger... :-/

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-01-30scripts: update tools
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Sun, 30 Jan 2011 19:31:51 +0100] rev 2288
scripts: update tools

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-01-28cc/gcc: enable plugins if needed
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Fri, 28 Jan 2011 18:53:37 +0100] rev 2287
cc/gcc: enable plugins if needed

Enabling plugins in binutils is not enough, and gcc also
needs to be ./configured with --enable-plugins, although
this is not documented anywhere... :-/

Reported-by: karthik duraisami <kdconstant@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-01-26scripts: squash the multi-slash in the sysroot symlink
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Wed, 26 Jan 2011 19:13:18 +0100] rev 2286
scripts: squash the multi-slash in the sysroot symlink

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-01-29comptools: add make-3.81
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Sat, 29 Jan 2011 00:57:02 +0100] rev 2285
comptools: add make-3.81

Since the advent of make-3.82, some packages now break due to changes
in make-3.82, being stricter than 3.81 when interpreting the Makefiles.

This has bugged us a bit too much so far, and I believe fixing all
of them is a long road, while simply building make-3.81 is the easiest
route for now.

Of course, in the long term, packages will get fixed upstream, and we
should back-port the fixes to old versions, and get rid of building
make-3.81. In the meantime...

Reported several times on the mailing list.

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-01-28config: add an option not to remove the destination directory
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Fri, 28 Jan 2011 22:06:49 +0100] rev 2284
config: add an option not to remove the destination directory

In certain circumstances, removing the destination/installation directory
is a bad idea. For example, when the build environment is already taking
care of sanitising the build tree, and pre-installs stuff in there, it is
a very bad idea to remove the destination directory.

This happens now in buildroot, as the crostool-NG backend now installs the
toolchain in the common host-tools directory, and pre-install there a few
host-utilities (eg. host-automake and host-gawk).

Provide a config knob to turn on/off the removal of the destination
directory, defaulting to 'y' (previous behavior), and forced to 'n' when
used as a backend.

Reported-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-01-26samples: update the mingw sample
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Wed, 26 Jan 2011 00:12:27 +0100] rev 2283
samples: update the mingw sample

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-01-26libc/mingw: do not remove support symlink
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Wed, 26 Jan 2011 00:04:41 +0100] rev 2282
libc/mingw: do not remove support symlink

Under mingw, it seems that there is a mix between the traditional /usr
directory, and a similar-purposed /mingw directory (both in the sysroot).

Currently, we create /mingw as a symlink to /usr, and we removed it in
the libc-finish step.

Unfortunately, this prevents the pre-processor to find the headers.
Keeping the symlink makes it magically work...

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-01-25config/toolchain: force use of sysroot if OBSOLETE is not set
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:14:52 +0100] rev 2281
config/toolchain: force use of sysroot if OBSOLETE is not set

Use of the sysroot is highly recommended, and the non-sysroot case is
both obsolete and not widely tested.

Before the non-sysroot case can go away, deprecate it.

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-01-25scripts: fix double slash in paths
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Tue, 25 Jan 2011 21:59:03 +0100] rev 2280
scripts: fix double slash in paths

Computed paths may contain double slashes.
This is not an issue but it is just ugly to look at.

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-01-25config: add an option to name the sysroot directory
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Tue, 25 Jan 2011 20:31:16 +0100] rev 2279
config: add an option to name the sysroot directory

Depending on local policies, some users have expressed a need to
have the sysroot be named differently than the hard-coded name.

Add an option for that.
Default to 'sysroot' to match the existing literature.

While at it, replace 'sys-root' with 'sysroot' everywhere we
reference the sysroot.

Reported-by: Alexey Kuznetsov <Alexey.KUZNETSOV@youtransactor.com>
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-01-22libc: remove now unneeded do_libc_headers
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Sat, 22 Jan 2011 22:36:20 +0100] rev 2278
libc: remove now unneeded do_libc_headers

do_libc_headers is now a noop, and is no longer used, so remove that step.

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-01-20libc/glibc-eglibc: misc janitorial cleanups.
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Thu, 20 Jan 2011 00:27:36 +0100] rev 2277
libc/glibc-eglibc: misc janitorial cleanups.

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-01-22libc/glibc: add glibc specifics to the shared code, and use it
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Sat, 22 Jan 2011 22:35:58 +0100] rev 2276
libc/glibc: add glibc specifics to the shared code, and use it

Final step at sharing code between glibc and eglibc.
Fall, wall of shame, fall!... :-)

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-01-22scripts: PARALLELMFLAGS is evil, rename
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Sat, 22 Jan 2011 22:35:43 +0100] rev 2275
scripts: PARALLELMFLAGS is evil, rename

The reunification of the glibc/eglibc code paths exposed a nasty
bug in the glibc build: use of PARALLELMFLAGS breaks the build.

See the explanations in that bug report against FC6:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?format=multiple&id=212111

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-01-22libc/glibc: commonalise assembling the list of addons
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Sat, 22 Jan 2011 22:35:18 +0100] rev 2274
libc/glibc: commonalise assembling the list of addons

glibc and eglibc each have two very similar ways of building this list.
This can, and should definitetly, be shared.

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-01-22libc/glibc: commonalise setting of the minimum supported kernel version
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Sat, 22 Jan 2011 22:35:02 +0100] rev 2273
libc/glibc: commonalise setting of the minimum supported kernel version

It will be possible to use that also with eglibc, so this hunk belongs to
the common code.

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-01-22libc/glibc: use the common start_files procedure
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Sat, 22 Jan 2011 22:37:25 +0100] rev 2272
libc/glibc: use the common start_files procedure

Use the common procedure, shared between glibc and eglibc. This requires
that glibc-specific bits be included in the shared procedure.

But still build the full libc with the glibc-specific procedure. This will
be commonalised in a future commit.

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-01-17libc/eglibc: cleanup common code for sharing with glibc
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Mon, 17 Jan 2011 23:04:57 +0100] rev 2271
libc/eglibc: cleanup common code for sharing with glibc

Some stuff is eglibc-specific, so needs to be conditonal.

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-01-17libc/eglibc: move generic code to a common file
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Mon, 17 Jan 2011 23:04:37 +0100] rev 2270
libc/eglibc: move generic code to a common file

The build procedure for eglibc is generic enough to
be shared between glibc and eglibc. This includes:
- headers install (empty!)
- start files build
- complete libc build
- libc finish (empty!)
- add-ons list

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-01-22libc/mingw: move content of do_libc_headers into do_libc_start_files
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Sat, 22 Jan 2011 22:32:44 +0100] rev 2269
libc/mingw: move content of do_libc_headers into do_libc_start_files

It is unnecessary to split C library preparation into two steps, as only
one really makes sense. So, do_libc_headers is bound to be withdrawn
short-term, in favor of do_libc_start_files.

mingw already had all its start files installation in do_libc_headers, and
do_libc_start_files was empty, just migrate the content of the former into
the latter.


Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-01-22libc/uClibc: move content of do_libc_headers into do_libc_start_files
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Sat, 22 Jan 2011 22:32:25 +0100] rev 2268
libc/uClibc: move content of do_libc_headers into do_libc_start_files

It is unnecessary to split C library preparation into two steps, as only
one really makes sense. So, do_libc_headers is bound to be withdrawn
short-term, in favor of do_libc_start_files.

uClibc already had all its start files installation in do_libc_headers, and
do_libc_start_files was empty, just migrate the content of the former into
the latter.

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-01-03libc-glibc: remove 2.3.6
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Mon, 03 Jan 2011 23:40:22 +0100] rev 2267
libc-glibc: remove 2.3.6

This is an obsolete version which is no longer used by any sample (the only
user, the ia64 sample, has been removed).

It also makes the code path a bit complex, with twists just to accomodate
that version. Removing the version will make those twists go away, and
will ease commonalisation of glibc and eglibc in the future (hopefully!).

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

2011-01-03arch: remove ia64
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> [Mon, 03 Jan 2011 22:02:06 +0100] rev 2266
arch: remove ia64

ia64 is broken in every gcc/glibc combinations I tested (except for the
existing sample that used very old versions).

Nobody complained on the list about not being able to build recent versions.

So the only way forward I can see is to remove the architecture altogether.

Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>