yann@402: The following fixes an error that occurs when building glibc-2.3.2 (but not glibc-2.2.5) for sh4:
yann@402: 
yann@402: In file included from sys/ustat.h:30,
yann@402:                  from ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/ustat.c:21:
yann@402: ../sysdeps/generic/bits/ustat.h:26: error: redefinition of `struct ustat'
yann@402: make[2]: *** [/home3/dank/crosstool-0.7/build/sh4-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc-3.3-glibc-2.3.2/build-glibc/misc/ustat.o] Error 1
yann@402: make[2]: Leaving directory `/home3/dank/crosstool-0.7/build/sh4-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc-3.3-glibc-2.3.2/glibc-2.3.2/misc'
yann@402: make[1]: *** [misc/subdir_lib] Error 2
yann@402: make[1]: Leaving directory `/home3/dank/crosstool-0.7/build/sh4-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc-3.3-glibc-2.3.2/glibc-2.3.2'
yann@402: make: *** [all] Error 2
yann@402: 
yann@402: ----------- snip ---------------
yann@402: 
yann@402: Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 08:00:00 +0900
yann@402: From: kaz Kojima <kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp>
yann@402: Subject: [linux-sh:02770] Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 for sh4 fails with "include/asm/user.h:32:
yann@402:  error: redefinition of `struct user_fpu_struct'"
yann@402: To: linux-sh@m17n.org
yann@402: Message-Id: <200306052250.h55Moeb08707@r-rr.iij4u.or.jp>
yann@402: 
yann@402: Hi,
yann@402: 
yann@402: Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com> wrote:
yann@402: > When I try to build glibc-2.3.2 for sh4, it fails with the error
yann@402: [snip]
yann@402: > /home3/dank/crosstool-0.3/result/sh4-linux/gcc-3.3-glibc-2.3.2/sh4-linux/include/asm/user.h:32: error: redefinition of `struct user_fpu_struct'
yann@402: > /home3/dank/crosstool-0.3/result/sh4-linux/gcc-3.3-glibc-2.3.2/sh4-linux/include/asm/user.h:39: error: redefinition of `struct user'
yann@402: [snip]
yann@402: > The error reminds me of the kind of thing fixed by
yann@402: > http://www.kegel.com/crossgcc/crosstool-0.4/glibc-2.3.2-patches/sh-user.patch
yann@402: 
yann@402: It seems that the definitions in asm/user.h and the above patch collide.
yann@402: I'm not sure why you need this patch, but is it needed for the problem
yann@402: about struct ustat that you pointed out in this list, isn't it?
yann@402: I found why I don't hit ustat problem - my local kernel tree includes
yann@402: the following patch, though I can't recall about it.
yann@402: 
yann@402: Regards,
yann@402: 	kaz
yann@402: --
yann@402: diff -u linux-2.5.69-sf-orig/include/linux/types.h /usr/local/sh4-unknown-linux-gnu/include/linux/types.h
yann@402: --- linux-2.5.69-sf-orig/include/linux/types.h	Wed Mar  5 12:29:34 2003
yann@402: +++ sh4-unknown-linux-gnu/include/linux/types.h	Sat Apr 19 10:05:52 2003
yann@402: @@ -141,6 +141,7 @@
yann@402:  
yann@402:  #endif /* __KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES */
yann@402:  
yann@402: +#ifdef	__KERNEL__
yann@402:  /*
yann@402:   * Below are truly Linux-specific types that should never collide with
yann@402:   * any application/library that wants linux/types.h.
yann@402: @@ -152,5 +153,6 @@
yann@402:  	char			f_fname[6];
yann@402:  	char			f_fpack[6];
yann@402:  };
yann@402: +#endif
yann@402:  
yann@402:  #endif /* _LINUX_TYPES_H */
yann@402: 
yann@402: